如何弥合差距?藏汉双语搜索行为中的信息不对称

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Shutian Zhang , Dan Wu
{"title":"如何弥合差距?藏汉双语搜索行为中的信息不对称","authors":"Shutian Zhang ,&nbsp;Dan Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2024.101329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Significant information asymmetries exist between majority and minority languages on the web. The information asymmetry makes it difficult for ethnic minorities to access online information in their native languages, exacerbating their information vulnerability. It is necessary to investigate whether the information asymmetry between these two languages affects the language selection and interaction behavior of bilinguals in online searches. A user search experiment (<em>N</em> = 30) was conducted in Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals, combined with retrospective think-aloud interviews. Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals showed a preference for Chinese search, seen as a native language (L1) loss tendency in search. The bilinguals present an information asymmetry stereotype, which influenced their search language selection and negatively affected their search behavior. Four search phases for Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals were identified: direct search, vigilant avoidance, blind attempts, and serendipitous search.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"46 4","pages":"Article 101329"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to bridge the gap? Information asymmetry in Tibetan-Chinese bilingual search behavior\",\"authors\":\"Shutian Zhang ,&nbsp;Dan Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lisr.2024.101329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Significant information asymmetries exist between majority and minority languages on the web. The information asymmetry makes it difficult for ethnic minorities to access online information in their native languages, exacerbating their information vulnerability. It is necessary to investigate whether the information asymmetry between these two languages affects the language selection and interaction behavior of bilinguals in online searches. A user search experiment (<em>N</em> = 30) was conducted in Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals, combined with retrospective think-aloud interviews. Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals showed a preference for Chinese search, seen as a native language (L1) loss tendency in search. The bilinguals present an information asymmetry stereotype, which influenced their search language selection and negatively affected their search behavior. Four search phases for Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals were identified: direct search, vigilant avoidance, blind attempts, and serendipitous search.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Library & Information Science Research\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Library & Information Science Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740818824000501\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library & Information Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740818824000501","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在网络上,多数语言和少数语言之间存在着显著的信息不对称。信息不对称使得少数民族难以获取母语网络信息,加剧了他们的信息脆弱性。两种语言之间的信息不对称是否会影响双语者在网络搜索中的语言选择和互动行为,这是有必要研究的。在藏汉双语者中进行用户搜索实验(N = 30),并结合回顾性的有声思考访谈。藏汉双语者对汉语搜索的偏好表现为母语搜索的丢失倾向。双语者存在信息不对称刻板印象,这种刻板印象影响了他们的搜索语言选择,并对他们的搜索行为产生负面影响。藏汉双语者的搜索阶段分为直接搜索阶段、警惕回避阶段、盲目尝试阶段和偶然搜索阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to bridge the gap? Information asymmetry in Tibetan-Chinese bilingual search behavior
Significant information asymmetries exist between majority and minority languages on the web. The information asymmetry makes it difficult for ethnic minorities to access online information in their native languages, exacerbating their information vulnerability. It is necessary to investigate whether the information asymmetry between these two languages affects the language selection and interaction behavior of bilinguals in online searches. A user search experiment (N = 30) was conducted in Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals, combined with retrospective think-aloud interviews. Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals showed a preference for Chinese search, seen as a native language (L1) loss tendency in search. The bilinguals present an information asymmetry stereotype, which influenced their search language selection and negatively affected their search behavior. Four search phases for Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals were identified: direct search, vigilant avoidance, blind attempts, and serendipitous search.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Library & Information Science Research
Library & Information Science Research INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.90%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Library & Information Science Research, a cross-disciplinary and refereed journal, focuses on the research process in library and information science as well as research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance. All papers are subject to a double-blind reviewing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信