匈牙利版多维解离量表(MID-HU)的验证——多源数据收集方法

IF 2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Zsófia Boytha , Ákos Münnich , Alexandra Szilágyiné Sándor , Gabriella Tullner , Zsuzsanna Bélteczki , E. Csaba Móré , Krisztina Czere , Tamás Kánya , Márton Lukács , Judit Molnár
{"title":"匈牙利版多维解离量表(MID-HU)的验证——多源数据收集方法","authors":"Zsófia Boytha ,&nbsp;Ákos Münnich ,&nbsp;Alexandra Szilágyiné Sándor ,&nbsp;Gabriella Tullner ,&nbsp;Zsuzsanna Bélteczki ,&nbsp;E. Csaba Móré ,&nbsp;Krisztina Czere ,&nbsp;Tamás Kánya ,&nbsp;Márton Lukács ,&nbsp;Judit Molnár","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article describes the development of the Hungarian version of the Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation (MID-HU). The MID is a 218-item, self-administered, multi-scale instrument that comprehensively assesses the phenomenological domain of pathological dissociation and is suitable for diagnosing dissociative disorders. We used a multi-source approach to reach participants. We collected data from the psychiatric and addiction wards of two hospitals, private practices, and from online sources. Finally, the results of 323 participants were analyzed. We used the participants’ DES and MID-HU results to classify them into five groups: (1) Healthy control group, (2) Dissociative disorder group, (3) Dissociative symptoms group, (4) Psychiatric inpatients group without dissociation and substance use disorder (SUD) and (5) Alcohol dependent inpatients without dissociation. For testing discriminant validity we used several sections of SR-DDIS.</div><div>The MID-HU had strong internal consistency, temporal stability and strong structural, convergent and discriminant validity. Factor analysis of the MID-HU extracted a single factor: dissociation. Our results are similar to other international findings. We also found that the mean MID-HU correlated strongly with two SR-DDIS subscales: ’Features associated with DID’ (r: 0.79) and the ’Schneiderian first-rank symptoms’ (r: 0.62), while only at a moderate level with the other subscales (r: 0.40). The two dissociative groups proved to be significantly more traumatized than the other groups, although we found childhood traumatization in the psychiatric and AD inpatient groups as well, which affected the construct validity results. The DD group proved to be most severely traumatized among the five groups of participants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":"9 1","pages":"Article 100497"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Hungarian Version of the Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation (MID-HU)–A Multi-Source Data Collection Approach\",\"authors\":\"Zsófia Boytha ,&nbsp;Ákos Münnich ,&nbsp;Alexandra Szilágyiné Sándor ,&nbsp;Gabriella Tullner ,&nbsp;Zsuzsanna Bélteczki ,&nbsp;E. Csaba Móré ,&nbsp;Krisztina Czere ,&nbsp;Tamás Kánya ,&nbsp;Márton Lukács ,&nbsp;Judit Molnár\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article describes the development of the Hungarian version of the Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation (MID-HU). The MID is a 218-item, self-administered, multi-scale instrument that comprehensively assesses the phenomenological domain of pathological dissociation and is suitable for diagnosing dissociative disorders. We used a multi-source approach to reach participants. We collected data from the psychiatric and addiction wards of two hospitals, private practices, and from online sources. Finally, the results of 323 participants were analyzed. We used the participants’ DES and MID-HU results to classify them into five groups: (1) Healthy control group, (2) Dissociative disorder group, (3) Dissociative symptoms group, (4) Psychiatric inpatients group without dissociation and substance use disorder (SUD) and (5) Alcohol dependent inpatients without dissociation. For testing discriminant validity we used several sections of SR-DDIS.</div><div>The MID-HU had strong internal consistency, temporal stability and strong structural, convergent and discriminant validity. Factor analysis of the MID-HU extracted a single factor: dissociation. Our results are similar to other international findings. We also found that the mean MID-HU correlated strongly with two SR-DDIS subscales: ’Features associated with DID’ (r: 0.79) and the ’Schneiderian first-rank symptoms’ (r: 0.62), while only at a moderate level with the other subscales (r: 0.40). The two dissociative groups proved to be significantly more traumatized than the other groups, although we found childhood traumatization in the psychiatric and AD inpatient groups as well, which affected the construct validity results. The DD group proved to be most severely traumatized among the five groups of participants.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100497\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924001200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924001200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文描述了匈牙利版多维解离量表(MID-HU)的发展。MID是一个218项,自我管理,多尺度的仪器,全面评估病理性分离的现象学领域,适用于诊断分离性障碍。我们使用多来源方法来接触参与者。我们从两家医院的精神病和成瘾病房、私人诊所和在线资源收集数据。最后,对323名参与者的结果进行分析。我们利用受试者的DES和MID-HU结果将其分为五组:(1)健康对照组,(2)分离障碍组,(3)分离症状组,(4)精神科住院患者无分离和物质使用障碍组(SUD)和(5)酒精依赖住院患者无分离。为了检验判别效度,我们使用了SR-DDIS的几个部分。MID-HU具有较强的内部一致性、时间稳定性和较强的结构效度、收敛效度和判别效度。因子分析提取MID-HU为单因素:解离。我们的研究结果与其他国际研究结果相似。我们还发现,平均MID-HU与两个SR-DDIS子量表:“与DID相关的特征”(r: 0.79)和“施耐德一级症状”(r: 0.62)密切相关,而与其他子量表仅处于中等水平(r: 0.40)。尽管我们发现精神科和阿尔茨海默病住院组也存在童年创伤,但两个分离组的创伤程度明显高于其他组,这影响了构念效度结果。事实证明,在五组参与者中,DD组受到的创伤最为严重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the Hungarian Version of the Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation (MID-HU)–A Multi-Source Data Collection Approach
This article describes the development of the Hungarian version of the Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation (MID-HU). The MID is a 218-item, self-administered, multi-scale instrument that comprehensively assesses the phenomenological domain of pathological dissociation and is suitable for diagnosing dissociative disorders. We used a multi-source approach to reach participants. We collected data from the psychiatric and addiction wards of two hospitals, private practices, and from online sources. Finally, the results of 323 participants were analyzed. We used the participants’ DES and MID-HU results to classify them into five groups: (1) Healthy control group, (2) Dissociative disorder group, (3) Dissociative symptoms group, (4) Psychiatric inpatients group without dissociation and substance use disorder (SUD) and (5) Alcohol dependent inpatients without dissociation. For testing discriminant validity we used several sections of SR-DDIS.
The MID-HU had strong internal consistency, temporal stability and strong structural, convergent and discriminant validity. Factor analysis of the MID-HU extracted a single factor: dissociation. Our results are similar to other international findings. We also found that the mean MID-HU correlated strongly with two SR-DDIS subscales: ’Features associated with DID’ (r: 0.79) and the ’Schneiderian first-rank symptoms’ (r: 0.62), while only at a moderate level with the other subscales (r: 0.40). The two dissociative groups proved to be significantly more traumatized than the other groups, although we found childhood traumatization in the psychiatric and AD inpatient groups as well, which affected the construct validity results. The DD group proved to be most severely traumatized among the five groups of participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信