美国中大西洋沿岸平原硬松林干扰依赖性林下植被相对密度与光照有效性和林下植物群落组成的关系

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Bernard N. Isaacson , Shawn P. Serbin , Jason C. Grabosky
{"title":"美国中大西洋沿岸平原硬松林干扰依赖性林下植被相对密度与光照有效性和林下植物群落组成的关系","authors":"Bernard N. Isaacson ,&nbsp;Shawn P. Serbin ,&nbsp;Jason C. Grabosky","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is a vigorous debate around whether and how to manage forests for climate mitigation or for other goals such as biodiversity. To achieve any of these goals it is necessary to define the parameters within which they can exist; ideally, the metrics used to evaluate progress towards one goal should be able to speak to other goals, especially when there are competing objectives at play. In the pitch pine (<em>Pinus rigida</em>) dominated coastal plain of New Jersey, open-canopy habitats are the locus of biodiversity, so we sought to define ‘open-canopy’ using a common metric of forest occupancy, Relative Density (RD). Using forest inventory data and light intensity measurements we found non-linear relationships between overstory RD and metrics of canopy light use. We then used RD to define upper limits of forest occupancy for fairly common open-canopy understory taxa above which one is very unlikely to find these plants. Our methods found credible thresholds in overstory density for four of five taxa, placing boundaries on the envelope of survivable conditions for these open-canopy community members. Native warm-season grasses (subfamily <em>Panicoideae</em>), <em>Carex</em>, <em>Quercus ilicifolia,</em> and <em>Q. marilandica</em> were not present in pitch pine forests above RD of roughly 0.57, aligning well with the approximate stocking level for stem exclusion. Separate validation data supported our quantified limits for warm-season grasses and demonstrated the importance of considering ground-layer competition but did not support overstory density thresholds for <em>Hudsonia spp</em>. Managers of similar pine forests with social goals in tension may be better able to quantify or illustrate tradeoffs between objectives using these results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"580 ","pages":"Article 122538"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linking overstory relative density to light availability and understory plant community composition in disturbance-dependent, Pinus rigida -dominated forests of the mid-Atlantic coastal plain, USA\",\"authors\":\"Bernard N. Isaacson ,&nbsp;Shawn P. Serbin ,&nbsp;Jason C. Grabosky\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>There is a vigorous debate around whether and how to manage forests for climate mitigation or for other goals such as biodiversity. To achieve any of these goals it is necessary to define the parameters within which they can exist; ideally, the metrics used to evaluate progress towards one goal should be able to speak to other goals, especially when there are competing objectives at play. In the pitch pine (<em>Pinus rigida</em>) dominated coastal plain of New Jersey, open-canopy habitats are the locus of biodiversity, so we sought to define ‘open-canopy’ using a common metric of forest occupancy, Relative Density (RD). Using forest inventory data and light intensity measurements we found non-linear relationships between overstory RD and metrics of canopy light use. We then used RD to define upper limits of forest occupancy for fairly common open-canopy understory taxa above which one is very unlikely to find these plants. Our methods found credible thresholds in overstory density for four of five taxa, placing boundaries on the envelope of survivable conditions for these open-canopy community members. Native warm-season grasses (subfamily <em>Panicoideae</em>), <em>Carex</em>, <em>Quercus ilicifolia,</em> and <em>Q. marilandica</em> were not present in pitch pine forests above RD of roughly 0.57, aligning well with the approximate stocking level for stem exclusion. Separate validation data supported our quantified limits for warm-season grasses and demonstrated the importance of considering ground-layer competition but did not support overstory density thresholds for <em>Hudsonia spp</em>. Managers of similar pine forests with social goals in tension may be better able to quantify or illustrate tradeoffs between objectives using these results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"volume\":\"580 \",\"pages\":\"Article 122538\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725000465\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725000465","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于是否以及如何管理森林以缓解气候变化,还是为了生物多样性等其他目标,存在着激烈的辩论。为了实现这些目标中的任何一个,都有必要确定它们能够存在的参数;理想情况下,用于评估实现一个目标的进度的指标应该能够与其他目标相关联,特别是当存在相互竞争的目标时。在以硬松林(Pinus rigida)为主的新泽西沿海平原上,开放冠层栖息地是生物多样性的所在地,因此我们试图使用森林占用率的通用度量标准——相对密度(RD)来定义“开放冠层”。利用森林清查数据和光强测量,我们发现林冠层RD与林冠层光利用指标之间存在非线性关系。然后,我们用RD定义了相当常见的开冠林下类群的森林占用上限,在这个上限上很难找到这些植物。我们的方法为5个分类群中的4个找到了可信的上层密度阈值,为这些开放冠层群落成员的生存条件设置了边界。原生暖季禾本科植物(松科)、苔草、栓皮栎和白栎均不存在于沥青松林中,RD值约为0.57,与茎排斥的近似放养水平基本一致。单独的验证数据支持我们对暖季草的量化限制,并证明了考虑地面层竞争的重要性,但不支持哈德逊树的上层密度阈值。类似松林的管理者在社会目标紧张的情况下,可能能够更好地量化或说明目标之间的权衡使用这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Linking overstory relative density to light availability and understory plant community composition in disturbance-dependent, Pinus rigida -dominated forests of the mid-Atlantic coastal plain, USA
There is a vigorous debate around whether and how to manage forests for climate mitigation or for other goals such as biodiversity. To achieve any of these goals it is necessary to define the parameters within which they can exist; ideally, the metrics used to evaluate progress towards one goal should be able to speak to other goals, especially when there are competing objectives at play. In the pitch pine (Pinus rigida) dominated coastal plain of New Jersey, open-canopy habitats are the locus of biodiversity, so we sought to define ‘open-canopy’ using a common metric of forest occupancy, Relative Density (RD). Using forest inventory data and light intensity measurements we found non-linear relationships between overstory RD and metrics of canopy light use. We then used RD to define upper limits of forest occupancy for fairly common open-canopy understory taxa above which one is very unlikely to find these plants. Our methods found credible thresholds in overstory density for four of five taxa, placing boundaries on the envelope of survivable conditions for these open-canopy community members. Native warm-season grasses (subfamily Panicoideae), Carex, Quercus ilicifolia, and Q. marilandica were not present in pitch pine forests above RD of roughly 0.57, aligning well with the approximate stocking level for stem exclusion. Separate validation data supported our quantified limits for warm-season grasses and demonstrated the importance of considering ground-layer competition but did not support overstory density thresholds for Hudsonia spp. Managers of similar pine forests with social goals in tension may be better able to quantify or illustrate tradeoffs between objectives using these results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信