小规模农场用于沼气和生物肥料生产的低技术沼气池的社会生命周期评估

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Kurt Ziegler-Rodriguez , Irene Josa , Liliana Castro , Humberto Escalante , Erik Vera-Mercado , Marianna Garfí
{"title":"小规模农场用于沼气和生物肥料生产的低技术沼气池的社会生命周期评估","authors":"Kurt Ziegler-Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Irene Josa ,&nbsp;Liliana Castro ,&nbsp;Humberto Escalante ,&nbsp;Erik Vera-Mercado ,&nbsp;Marianna Garfí","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to assess the social performance of a low-tech digester implemented in a small-scale farm in Colombia. To this aim, a Social Life Cycle Assessment framework was developed to evaluate two scenarios: i) previous (baseline) scenario where manure was stored in a manure pit, liquefied petroleum gas was used for cooking and synthetic fertiliser was applied to crops; ii) current scenario where a low-tech digester treats manure and produces biogas and biofertiliser (digestate). The biogas is used for cooking replacing the liquefied petroleum gas while the digestate replaces the synthetic fertiliser. The stakeholder groups considered were: farmers/digester users (i.e. workers), local community, value chain actors, society and consumers. The impact categories were: cultural heritage, health and safety, working conditions, education, human rights, socio-economic repercussions, and consumer vs. user relationships. Results showed that low-tech digester implementation had a better social performance than piling up organic waste (with a final score of 36 and 10, respectively). This was mainly due to: i) education improvement and poverty alleviation for farmers; ii) improvement of community engagement, access to material resources (fuels, fertiliser, food) and education for the local community; iii) enhancement of social responsibility and supplier vs. user relationships for value chain actors; and iv) improvement of transparency and feedback mechanisms for consumers. Implementing low-tech digesters in the frame of a wider programme led by local entities and aiming at training and empowering farmers is a key issue for achieving the aforementioned social benefits and deep and long-term social change. More efforts should be made to reduce potential health and safety risks for all the stakeholders by i) training users to perform daily maintenance checks, and ii) setting up strategies to improve digestate quality for its safe reuse in agriculture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"54 ","pages":"Pages 303-323"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social life cycle assessment of low-tech digesters for biogas and biofertiliser production in small-scale farms\",\"authors\":\"Kurt Ziegler-Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Irene Josa ,&nbsp;Liliana Castro ,&nbsp;Humberto Escalante ,&nbsp;Erik Vera-Mercado ,&nbsp;Marianna Garfí\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spc.2025.01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aimed to assess the social performance of a low-tech digester implemented in a small-scale farm in Colombia. To this aim, a Social Life Cycle Assessment framework was developed to evaluate two scenarios: i) previous (baseline) scenario where manure was stored in a manure pit, liquefied petroleum gas was used for cooking and synthetic fertiliser was applied to crops; ii) current scenario where a low-tech digester treats manure and produces biogas and biofertiliser (digestate). The biogas is used for cooking replacing the liquefied petroleum gas while the digestate replaces the synthetic fertiliser. The stakeholder groups considered were: farmers/digester users (i.e. workers), local community, value chain actors, society and consumers. The impact categories were: cultural heritage, health and safety, working conditions, education, human rights, socio-economic repercussions, and consumer vs. user relationships. Results showed that low-tech digester implementation had a better social performance than piling up organic waste (with a final score of 36 and 10, respectively). This was mainly due to: i) education improvement and poverty alleviation for farmers; ii) improvement of community engagement, access to material resources (fuels, fertiliser, food) and education for the local community; iii) enhancement of social responsibility and supplier vs. user relationships for value chain actors; and iv) improvement of transparency and feedback mechanisms for consumers. Implementing low-tech digesters in the frame of a wider programme led by local entities and aiming at training and empowering farmers is a key issue for achieving the aforementioned social benefits and deep and long-term social change. More efforts should be made to reduce potential health and safety risks for all the stakeholders by i) training users to perform daily maintenance checks, and ii) setting up strategies to improve digestate quality for its safe reuse in agriculture.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Production and Consumption\",\"volume\":\"54 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 303-323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Production and Consumption\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925000041\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925000041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估在哥伦比亚一个小型农场实施的低技术消化器的社会绩效。为此目的,制定了一个社会生命周期评估框架,以评估两种情景:i)以前的(基线)情景,将粪便储存在粪坑中,使用液化石油气做饭,并将合成肥料施用于作物;Ii)低技术沼气池处理粪便并产生沼气和生物肥料(沼气池)的当前方案。沼气代替液化石油气用于烹饪,沼液代替合成肥料。考虑的利益相关者群体包括:农民/沼气池用户(即工人)、当地社区、价值链参与者、社会和消费者。影响类别包括:文化遗产、健康和安全、工作条件、教育、人权、社会经济影响以及消费者与用户的关系。结果表明,低技术含量的沼气池比堆积有机废物具有更好的社会绩效(最终得分分别为36分和10分)。这主要是由于:1)改善了农民的教育和扶贫;Ii)改善社区参与,为当地社区提供物质资源(燃料、肥料、食品)和教育;Iii)增强价值链参与者的社会责任和供应商与用户的关系;四是提高消费者的透明度和反馈机制。在地方实体领导的旨在培训农民和赋予农民权力的更广泛方案框架内实施低技术消化器是实现上述社会效益和深刻而长期的社会变革的关键问题。应作出更多努力,通过以下方式减少所有利益攸关方的潜在健康和安全风险:(1)培训用户进行日常维护检查;(2)制定战略,提高消化液质量,以便在农业中安全再利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Social life cycle assessment of low-tech digesters for biogas and biofertiliser production in small-scale farms

Social life cycle assessment of low-tech digesters for biogas and biofertiliser production in small-scale farms
This study aimed to assess the social performance of a low-tech digester implemented in a small-scale farm in Colombia. To this aim, a Social Life Cycle Assessment framework was developed to evaluate two scenarios: i) previous (baseline) scenario where manure was stored in a manure pit, liquefied petroleum gas was used for cooking and synthetic fertiliser was applied to crops; ii) current scenario where a low-tech digester treats manure and produces biogas and biofertiliser (digestate). The biogas is used for cooking replacing the liquefied petroleum gas while the digestate replaces the synthetic fertiliser. The stakeholder groups considered were: farmers/digester users (i.e. workers), local community, value chain actors, society and consumers. The impact categories were: cultural heritage, health and safety, working conditions, education, human rights, socio-economic repercussions, and consumer vs. user relationships. Results showed that low-tech digester implementation had a better social performance than piling up organic waste (with a final score of 36 and 10, respectively). This was mainly due to: i) education improvement and poverty alleviation for farmers; ii) improvement of community engagement, access to material resources (fuels, fertiliser, food) and education for the local community; iii) enhancement of social responsibility and supplier vs. user relationships for value chain actors; and iv) improvement of transparency and feedback mechanisms for consumers. Implementing low-tech digesters in the frame of a wider programme led by local entities and aiming at training and empowering farmers is a key issue for achieving the aforementioned social benefits and deep and long-term social change. More efforts should be made to reduce potential health and safety risks for all the stakeholders by i) training users to perform daily maintenance checks, and ii) setting up strategies to improve digestate quality for its safe reuse in agriculture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信