假复针对健康人群的致盲作用

IF 1.3 4区医学 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE

World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wjam.2024.09.010

Hui-yi HUANG (黄慧仪) , Yan-yan CAI (蔡演演) , Qing-song ZHANG (张清松) , Yi-ping HUANG (黄毅平) , Zhong-hua FU (符仲华)

{"title":"假复针对健康人群的致盲作用","authors":"Hui-yi HUANG (黄慧仪) , Yan-yan CAI (蔡演演) , Qing-song ZHANG (张清松) , Yi-ping HUANG (黄毅平) , Zhong-hua FU (符仲华)","doi":"10.1016/j.wjam.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div><em>Fu's</em> subcutaneous needling (FSN) has been shown potential positive effectiveness in clinical practice. However, its specific effects are still not clear. This study aims to evaluate the blinding effect of a non-penetrating sham FSN needle, developed for the first time by the authors' research team in healthy participants. Furthermore, to provide a reliable control tool to assess the specific effects of FSN.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a randomized, sham-controlled trial in 60 healthy participants divided into FSN group and sham FSN group in a 1:1 ratio. The participants were assessed according to blinding index (BI), pain intensity, sensation type and acceptability of needling.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The James' BI was (0.56, 95 %CI [0.45, 0.67]) for two groups. The Bang's BI was (0.50, 95 % CI [0.24, 0.76]) in the FSN group and (−0.36, 95 % CI [−0.67, −0.07]) in the sham FSN group. There was no significant difference between needling pain intensity (<em>P</em> > 0.05) and type of needling sensation. A total of 96.6 % participants who received sham FSN and 86.6 % participants who received FSN considered the needling acceptable or better.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study confirmed the effective blinding capability of the sham FSN needles in healthy participants, indicating that the novel non-penetrating sham FSN needle can be served as eligible control to evaluate the specific effects of FSN.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44648,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 312-317"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blinding effect of sham Fu's subcutaneous needling in a healthy population\",\"authors\":\"Hui-yi HUANG (黄慧仪) , Yan-yan CAI (蔡演演) , Qing-song ZHANG (张清松) , Yi-ping HUANG (黄毅平) , Zhong-hua FU (符仲华)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wjam.2024.09.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div><em>Fu's</em> subcutaneous needling (FSN) has been shown potential positive effectiveness in clinical practice. However, its specific effects are still not clear. This study aims to evaluate the blinding effect of a non-penetrating sham FSN needle, developed for the first time by the authors' research team in healthy participants. Furthermore, to provide a reliable control tool to assess the specific effects of FSN.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a randomized, sham-controlled trial in 60 healthy participants divided into FSN group and sham FSN group in a 1:1 ratio. The participants were assessed according to blinding index (BI), pain intensity, sensation type and acceptability of needling.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The James' BI was (0.56, 95 %CI [0.45, 0.67]) for two groups. The Bang's BI was (0.50, 95 % CI [0.24, 0.76]) in the FSN group and (−0.36, 95 % CI [−0.67, −0.07]) in the sham FSN group. There was no significant difference between needling pain intensity (<em>P</em> > 0.05) and type of needling sensation. A total of 96.6 % participants who received sham FSN and 86.6 % participants who received FSN considered the needling acceptable or better.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study confirmed the effective blinding capability of the sham FSN needles in healthy participants, indicating that the novel non-penetrating sham FSN needle can be served as eligible control to evaluate the specific effects of FSN.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 312-317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1003525724000679\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1003525724000679","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的fu皮下针刺法在临床应用中显示出潜在的积极疗效。然而，其具体效果尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估非穿透性假FSN针在健康参与者中的致盲效果，该针是作者研究小组首次开发的。此外，提供一种可靠的控制工具来评估FSN的具体效果。方法采用随机、假对照试验，将60名健康受试者按1:1的比例分为FSN组和假FSN组。根据盲指数（BI）、疼痛强度、感觉类型和针刺可接受性对受试者进行评估。结果两组患者的James' BI分别为（0.56,95% CI[0.45, 0.67]）。FSN组Bang’s BI为（0.50,95% CI[0.24, 0.76]），假FSN组Bang’s BI为（- 0.36,95% CI[- 0.67, - 0.07]）。针刺疼痛强度(P >；0.05)和针刺感觉类型。接受假FSN的96.6%的参与者和接受FSN的86.6%的参与者认为针刺可以接受或更好。结论本研究证实了假FSN针对健康受试者的有效致盲能力，表明新型非穿透性假FSN针可作为评价假FSN特异性效果的合格对照。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Blinding effect of sham Fu's subcutaneous needling in a healthy population

Objective

Fu's subcutaneous needling (FSN) has been shown potential positive effectiveness in clinical practice. However, its specific effects are still not clear. This study aims to evaluate the blinding effect of a non-penetrating sham FSN needle, developed for the first time by the authors' research team in healthy participants. Furthermore, to provide a reliable control tool to assess the specific effects of FSN.

Methods

We conducted a randomized, sham-controlled trial in 60 healthy participants divided into FSN group and sham FSN group in a 1:1 ratio. The participants were assessed according to blinding index (BI), pain intensity, sensation type and acceptability of needling.

Results

The James' BI was (0.56, 95 %CI [0.45, 0.67]) for two groups. The Bang's BI was (0.50, 95 % CI [0.24, 0.76]) in the FSN group and (−0.36, 95 % CI [−0.67, −0.07]) in the sham FSN group. There was no significant difference between needling pain intensity (P > 0.05) and type of needling sensation. A total of 96.6 % participants who received sham FSN and 86.6 % participants who received FSN considered the needling acceptable or better.

Conclusion

This study confirmed the effective blinding capability of the sham FSN needles in healthy participants, indicating that the novel non-penetrating sham FSN needle can be served as eligible control to evaluate the specific effects of FSN.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

28.60%

发文量

1089

审稿时长

50 days

期刊介绍： The focus of the journal includes, but is not confined to, clinical research, summaries of clinical experiences, experimental research and clinical reports on needling techniques, moxibustion techniques, acupuncture analgesia and acupuncture anesthesia.