M. Frankiewicz , J. Adamowicz , L. Białek , F. Campos-Juanatey , F. Chierigo , A. Cocci , F.X. Madec , G. Mantica , M. Oszczudłowski , E.J. Redmond , C.M. Rosenbaum , W. Verla , M. Waterloos , M. Jobczyk , A. Kałużny , M.W. Vetterlein , M. Matuszewski , en representación del Grupo de Trabajo de Urología Reconstructiva y Trauma Urológico de la Sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos - Asociación Europea de Urología
{"title":"口腔粘膜移植物切除术患者口腔护理的临床途径:系统综述","authors":"M. Frankiewicz , J. Adamowicz , L. Białek , F. Campos-Juanatey , F. Chierigo , A. Cocci , F.X. Madec , G. Mantica , M. Oszczudłowski , E.J. Redmond , C.M. Rosenbaum , W. Verla , M. Waterloos , M. Jobczyk , A. Kałużny , M.W. Vetterlein , M. Matuszewski , en representación del Grupo de Trabajo de Urología Reconstructiva y Trauma Urológico de la Sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos - Asociación Europea de Urología","doi":"10.1016/j.acuro.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Oral mucosal grafts are essential in reconstructive urology, particularly for urethral and genital defects. Advances in harvesting and implantation techniques have been made, yet perioperative care remains crucial for optimal outcomes. This systematic review explores postoperative care pathways following oral mucosal graft harvesting to consolidate knowledge, identify best practices, and highlight research gaps.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The review aims to identify optimal care pathways, compare different oral care approaches, and address research gaps.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases without time constraints. Key search terms included «oral mucosal graft», «oral care pathways», «OMG post-operative care», «BMG», «LMG», and «OMG graft harvesting». Selection followed PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria focused on studies addressing oral mucosal grafts in reconstructive urology and associated perioperative care, excluding non-English articles, case reports, and editorials.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The review underscores the suitability of oral mucosa for grafting due to properties like excellent vascularization and minimal immunogenicity. Comparisons among graft harvesting sites reveal differences in tissue quality, ease of harvest, and donor site morbidity. Non-closure techniques generally result in less postoperative pain and quicker healing, though closure might better control bleeding and infection. Despite common complications such as mild trismus and altered chewing efficiency, patient satisfaction remains high.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Effective management of oral mucosal grafts harvesting emphasizes tailored perioperative care to minimize complications and enhance recovery. Further research should focus on long-term oral morbidity, standardized care protocols, and patient-reported outcomes to improve care pathways and surgical results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7145,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"49 1","pages":"Pages 20-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vías clínicas para el cuidado oral en pacientes sometidos a extracción de injerto de mucosa oral: una revisión sistemática\",\"authors\":\"M. Frankiewicz , J. Adamowicz , L. Białek , F. Campos-Juanatey , F. Chierigo , A. Cocci , F.X. Madec , G. Mantica , M. Oszczudłowski , E.J. Redmond , C.M. Rosenbaum , W. Verla , M. Waterloos , M. Jobczyk , A. Kałużny , M.W. Vetterlein , M. Matuszewski , en representación del Grupo de Trabajo de Urología Reconstructiva y Trauma Urológico de la Sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos - Asociación Europea de Urología\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acuro.2024.10.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Oral mucosal grafts are essential in reconstructive urology, particularly for urethral and genital defects. Advances in harvesting and implantation techniques have been made, yet perioperative care remains crucial for optimal outcomes. This systematic review explores postoperative care pathways following oral mucosal graft harvesting to consolidate knowledge, identify best practices, and highlight research gaps.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The review aims to identify optimal care pathways, compare different oral care approaches, and address research gaps.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases without time constraints. Key search terms included «oral mucosal graft», «oral care pathways», «OMG post-operative care», «BMG», «LMG», and «OMG graft harvesting». Selection followed PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria focused on studies addressing oral mucosal grafts in reconstructive urology and associated perioperative care, excluding non-English articles, case reports, and editorials.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The review underscores the suitability of oral mucosa for grafting due to properties like excellent vascularization and minimal immunogenicity. Comparisons among graft harvesting sites reveal differences in tissue quality, ease of harvest, and donor site morbidity. Non-closure techniques generally result in less postoperative pain and quicker healing, though closure might better control bleeding and infection. Despite common complications such as mild trismus and altered chewing efficiency, patient satisfaction remains high.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Effective management of oral mucosal grafts harvesting emphasizes tailored perioperative care to minimize complications and enhance recovery. Further research should focus on long-term oral morbidity, standardized care protocols, and patient-reported outcomes to improve care pathways and surgical results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Actas urologicas espanolas\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 20-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Actas urologicas espanolas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210480624001177\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210480624001177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
口腔粘膜移植在泌尿外科重建中是必不可少的,特别是对于尿道和生殖器缺陷。收获和植入技术已经取得进展,但围手术期护理仍然是最佳结果的关键。本系统综述探讨了口腔粘膜移植物收获后的术后护理途径,以巩固知识,确定最佳做法,并突出研究空白。目的本综述旨在确定最佳的口腔护理途径,比较不同的口腔护理方法,并解决研究空白。方法采用PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science数据库进行系统文献检索,不受时间限制。关键搜索词包括“口腔黏膜移植”、“口腔护理途径”、“OMG术后护理”、“BMG”、“LMG”和“OMG移植”。选择遵循PRISMA指南。纳入标准集中于口腔黏膜移植在泌尿外科重建及相关围手术期护理方面的研究,不包括非英文文章、病例报告和社论。结果口腔黏膜具有良好的血管化和最小的免疫原性等特性,适合移植。在移植收获地点之间的比较揭示了组织质量、收获难易程度和供体部位发病率的差异。非闭合技术通常会减少术后疼痛和更快愈合,尽管闭合可能会更好地控制出血和感染。尽管常见的并发症,如轻度牙关和咀嚼效率的改变,患者的满意度仍然很高。结论口腔粘膜移植的有效管理强调围手术期的个性化护理,以减少并发症,提高康复率。进一步的研究应侧重于长期口腔发病率、标准化护理方案和患者报告的结果,以改善护理途径和手术结果。
Vías clínicas para el cuidado oral en pacientes sometidos a extracción de injerto de mucosa oral: una revisión sistemática
Introduction
Oral mucosal grafts are essential in reconstructive urology, particularly for urethral and genital defects. Advances in harvesting and implantation techniques have been made, yet perioperative care remains crucial for optimal outcomes. This systematic review explores postoperative care pathways following oral mucosal graft harvesting to consolidate knowledge, identify best practices, and highlight research gaps.
Objective
The review aims to identify optimal care pathways, compare different oral care approaches, and address research gaps.
Methods
A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases without time constraints. Key search terms included «oral mucosal graft», «oral care pathways», «OMG post-operative care», «BMG», «LMG», and «OMG graft harvesting». Selection followed PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria focused on studies addressing oral mucosal grafts in reconstructive urology and associated perioperative care, excluding non-English articles, case reports, and editorials.
Results
The review underscores the suitability of oral mucosa for grafting due to properties like excellent vascularization and minimal immunogenicity. Comparisons among graft harvesting sites reveal differences in tissue quality, ease of harvest, and donor site morbidity. Non-closure techniques generally result in less postoperative pain and quicker healing, though closure might better control bleeding and infection. Despite common complications such as mild trismus and altered chewing efficiency, patient satisfaction remains high.
Conclusions
Effective management of oral mucosal grafts harvesting emphasizes tailored perioperative care to minimize complications and enhance recovery. Further research should focus on long-term oral morbidity, standardized care protocols, and patient-reported outcomes to improve care pathways and surgical results.
期刊介绍:
Actas Urológicas Españolas is an international journal dedicated to urological diseases and renal transplant. It has been the official publication of the Spanish Urology Association since 1974 and of the American Urology Confederation since 2008. Its articles cover all aspects related to urology.
Actas Urológicas Españolas, governed by the peer review system (double blinded), is published online in Spanish and English. Consequently, manuscripts may be sent in Spanish or English and bidirectional free cost translation will be provided.