自底向上估计抗菌素耐药性负担:估计巴西抗菌素耐药性影响的研究重点

IF 1.5 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Katherine Keenan , Carlos Roberto Veiga Kiffer , Érico V.S. Carmo , Juliana Silva Corrêa , André Luiz de Abreu , Adriano Massuda , Ana Christina Gales , Arnaldo Lopes Colombo , the Institute of Antimicrobial Resistance of São Paulo (ARIES) group
{"title":"自底向上估计抗菌素耐药性负担:估计巴西抗菌素耐药性影响的研究重点","authors":"Katherine Keenan ,&nbsp;Carlos Roberto Veiga Kiffer ,&nbsp;Érico V.S. Carmo ,&nbsp;Juliana Silva Corrêa ,&nbsp;André Luiz de Abreu ,&nbsp;Adriano Massuda ,&nbsp;Ana Christina Gales ,&nbsp;Arnaldo Lopes Colombo ,&nbsp;the Institute of Antimicrobial Resistance of São Paulo (ARIES) group","doi":"10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.100558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent estimates of deaths attributable to bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) highlight the immense public health threat of AMR to healthcare systems, economies, and communities in Latin America. Although global modelling studies generate important statistics to motivate and guide global and national agendas, their complex methodology and aggregation mean that they have a more limited impact at the local scales where AMR is experienced and tackled. At the same time, it is increasingly recognised that we need to study and design AMR policies ‘from the bottom-up’, drawing on data and perspectives that ensure local ownership of the research and policy agenda. But how do we integrate ‘bottom-up’ perspectives into AMR burden estimation? Brazil is used as a case study to illustrate the importance of this approach. Brazil's vast and decentralised healthcare system would benefit from robust regional estimates of AMR's clinical, economic, and social burdens to move political decision-making and design appropriate interventions. We report on recommendations gathered from interdisciplinary stakeholder exercises and propose strategic priorities for estimating the AMR burden in Brazil at subnational scales of governance. These include focusing on individual-level data linkages at various scales; capturing public and private healthcare systems; understanding AMR inequalities; and capturing linked clinical, economic, and social burdens.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73335,"journal":{"name":"IJID regions","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100558"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial resistance burden estimates from the bottom-up: research priorities for estimating the impact of antimicrobial resistance in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Keenan ,&nbsp;Carlos Roberto Veiga Kiffer ,&nbsp;Érico V.S. Carmo ,&nbsp;Juliana Silva Corrêa ,&nbsp;André Luiz de Abreu ,&nbsp;Adriano Massuda ,&nbsp;Ana Christina Gales ,&nbsp;Arnaldo Lopes Colombo ,&nbsp;the Institute of Antimicrobial Resistance of São Paulo (ARIES) group\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.100558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recent estimates of deaths attributable to bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) highlight the immense public health threat of AMR to healthcare systems, economies, and communities in Latin America. Although global modelling studies generate important statistics to motivate and guide global and national agendas, their complex methodology and aggregation mean that they have a more limited impact at the local scales where AMR is experienced and tackled. At the same time, it is increasingly recognised that we need to study and design AMR policies ‘from the bottom-up’, drawing on data and perspectives that ensure local ownership of the research and policy agenda. But how do we integrate ‘bottom-up’ perspectives into AMR burden estimation? Brazil is used as a case study to illustrate the importance of this approach. Brazil's vast and decentralised healthcare system would benefit from robust regional estimates of AMR's clinical, economic, and social burdens to move political decision-making and design appropriate interventions. We report on recommendations gathered from interdisciplinary stakeholder exercises and propose strategic priorities for estimating the AMR burden in Brazil at subnational scales of governance. These include focusing on individual-level data linkages at various scales; capturing public and private healthcare systems; understanding AMR inequalities; and capturing linked clinical, economic, and social burdens.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJID regions\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJID regions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772707624002273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJID regions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772707624002273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近对细菌抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)导致的死亡的估计突出了AMR对拉丁美洲卫生保健系统、经济和社区的巨大公共卫生威胁。尽管全球模型研究产生了重要的统计数据,以激励和指导全球和国家议程,但其复杂的方法和汇总意味着它们在经历和处理抗微生物药物耐药性的地方尺度上的影响更为有限。与此同时,人们越来越认识到,我们需要“自下而上”地研究和设计抗微生物药物耐药性政策,利用数据和观点,确保地方对研究和政策议程的所有权。但是,我们如何将“自下而上”的观点整合到抗菌素耐药性负担评估中呢?本文以巴西为例,说明了这种方法的重要性。巴西庞大而分散的医疗保健系统将受益于对抗菌药耐药性的临床、经济和社会负担进行强有力的区域评估,从而推动政治决策和设计适当的干预措施。我们报告了从跨学科利益相关者实践中收集到的建议,并提出了在巴西次国家治理规模上估计抗菌素耐药性负担的战略重点。这些措施包括侧重于不同规模的个人一级数据联系;捕获公共和私人医疗保健系统;了解抗菌素耐药性不平等;并抓住相关的临床、经济和社会负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antimicrobial resistance burden estimates from the bottom-up: research priorities for estimating the impact of antimicrobial resistance in Brazil
Recent estimates of deaths attributable to bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) highlight the immense public health threat of AMR to healthcare systems, economies, and communities in Latin America. Although global modelling studies generate important statistics to motivate and guide global and national agendas, their complex methodology and aggregation mean that they have a more limited impact at the local scales where AMR is experienced and tackled. At the same time, it is increasingly recognised that we need to study and design AMR policies ‘from the bottom-up’, drawing on data and perspectives that ensure local ownership of the research and policy agenda. But how do we integrate ‘bottom-up’ perspectives into AMR burden estimation? Brazil is used as a case study to illustrate the importance of this approach. Brazil's vast and decentralised healthcare system would benefit from robust regional estimates of AMR's clinical, economic, and social burdens to move political decision-making and design appropriate interventions. We report on recommendations gathered from interdisciplinary stakeholder exercises and propose strategic priorities for estimating the AMR burden in Brazil at subnational scales of governance. These include focusing on individual-level data linkages at various scales; capturing public and private healthcare systems; understanding AMR inequalities; and capturing linked clinical, economic, and social burdens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IJID regions
IJID regions Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
64 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信