看速度是个好主意吗?以更快的速度观看教学视频的潜在元认知并发症

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Jode Keehr, Richard Reardon
{"title":"看速度是个好主意吗?以更快的速度观看教学视频的潜在元认知并发症","authors":"Jode Keehr,&nbsp;Richard Reardon","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Online learning has become mainstream for many learners. To save time, many students “speed-watch” video lectures (play them at faster-than-original speed). Numerous studies have evaluated the effect of video speed on learning, concentrating on aspects such as comprehension and satisfaction. Yet few researchers have considered metacognitive impacts of speed watching, especially within the context of a complex learning environment. In this study, we investigated the relationships between video playback speed, interruptions, and learning performance. Learning was assessed using measures of recognition, elaboration, and confidence. We presented participants with lectures at 1x and 1.5x speeds, with or without interruption. Results revealed that speed-watching did not impair recognition performance, nor did it hinder elaboration. Interruptions hampered elaboration, regardless of video speed, leading to acceptable memory for content, but weaker connection of the newer material to other relevant memory content. Additionally, speed-watching resulted in less confidence in learning, <em>except</em> when interruptions were present. We discuss potential speed-watching effects on attention and metacognition, i.e., that attention was increased, albeit at the expense of confidence. We encourage students to consider their learning environment when choosing to speed-watch. Less confident learners may adjust strategies in ways that defeat the time advantage gained by faster playback.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 108556"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is speed-watching a good idea? Potential metacognitive complications of watching instructional videos at faster speeds\",\"authors\":\"Jode Keehr,&nbsp;Richard Reardon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Online learning has become mainstream for many learners. To save time, many students “speed-watch” video lectures (play them at faster-than-original speed). Numerous studies have evaluated the effect of video speed on learning, concentrating on aspects such as comprehension and satisfaction. Yet few researchers have considered metacognitive impacts of speed watching, especially within the context of a complex learning environment. In this study, we investigated the relationships between video playback speed, interruptions, and learning performance. Learning was assessed using measures of recognition, elaboration, and confidence. We presented participants with lectures at 1x and 1.5x speeds, with or without interruption. Results revealed that speed-watching did not impair recognition performance, nor did it hinder elaboration. Interruptions hampered elaboration, regardless of video speed, leading to acceptable memory for content, but weaker connection of the newer material to other relevant memory content. Additionally, speed-watching resulted in less confidence in learning, <em>except</em> when interruptions were present. We discuss potential speed-watching effects on attention and metacognition, i.e., that attention was increased, albeit at the expense of confidence. We encourage students to consider their learning environment when choosing to speed-watch. Less confident learners may adjust strategies in ways that defeat the time advantage gained by faster playback.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108556\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225000032\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225000032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在线学习已经成为许多学习者的主流。为了节省时间,许多学生“速看”视频讲座(以比原来更快的速度播放)。许多研究已经评估了视频速度对学习的影响,主要集中在理解和满意度等方面。然而,很少有研究人员考虑到速度观看对元认知的影响,特别是在复杂的学习环境中。在本研究中,我们调查了视频播放速度、中断和学习表现之间的关系。学习是用认知、阐述和自信来评估的。我们以1倍和1.5倍的速度向参与者提供讲座,有或没有中断。结果显示,观看速度不会影响识别能力,也不会妨碍详细阐述。无论视频速度如何,中断都会阻碍阐述,导致内容的可接受内存,但较新的材料与其他相关内存内容的连接较弱。此外,快速观看导致学习信心下降,除非有干扰存在。我们讨论了速度观察对注意力和元认知的潜在影响,即注意力增加了,尽管以信心为代价。我们鼓励学生在选择超速手表时考虑他们的学习环境。缺乏自信的学习者可能会调整策略,以抵消快速回放所带来的时间优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is speed-watching a good idea? Potential metacognitive complications of watching instructional videos at faster speeds
Online learning has become mainstream for many learners. To save time, many students “speed-watch” video lectures (play them at faster-than-original speed). Numerous studies have evaluated the effect of video speed on learning, concentrating on aspects such as comprehension and satisfaction. Yet few researchers have considered metacognitive impacts of speed watching, especially within the context of a complex learning environment. In this study, we investigated the relationships between video playback speed, interruptions, and learning performance. Learning was assessed using measures of recognition, elaboration, and confidence. We presented participants with lectures at 1x and 1.5x speeds, with or without interruption. Results revealed that speed-watching did not impair recognition performance, nor did it hinder elaboration. Interruptions hampered elaboration, regardless of video speed, leading to acceptable memory for content, but weaker connection of the newer material to other relevant memory content. Additionally, speed-watching resulted in less confidence in learning, except when interruptions were present. We discuss potential speed-watching effects on attention and metacognition, i.e., that attention was increased, albeit at the expense of confidence. We encourage students to consider their learning environment when choosing to speed-watch. Less confident learners may adjust strategies in ways that defeat the time advantage gained by faster playback.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信