重组因子via:通过产品创新对作用机制的新认识

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Miguel A. Escobar , Maureane Hoffman , Giancarlo Castaman , Cedric Hermans , Johnny Mahlangu , Johannes Oldenburg , Charles L. Percy , Mark T. Reding , Amy D. Shapiro , Steven W. Pipe
{"title":"重组因子via:通过产品创新对作用机制的新认识","authors":"Miguel A. Escobar ,&nbsp;Maureane Hoffman ,&nbsp;Giancarlo Castaman ,&nbsp;Cedric Hermans ,&nbsp;Johnny Mahlangu ,&nbsp;Johannes Oldenburg ,&nbsp;Charles L. Percy ,&nbsp;Mark T. Reding ,&nbsp;Amy D. Shapiro ,&nbsp;Steven W. Pipe","doi":"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Management of bleeding in persons with hemophilia and inhibitors involves treatment with bypassing agents, including recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). Two rFVIIa products are commercially approved for use in the United States and the European Union. Eptacog alfa and eptacog beta share the same amino acid sequence but differ in posttranslational modifications. Although rFVIIa has been used to manage bleeding in persons with hemophilia and inhibitors for over 30 years, its mechanisms of action is still being studied. <em>In vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> studies have suggested that rFVIIa could promote hemostasis by (1) increasing tissue factor-dependent activation of factor (F)X (FX); (2) directly activating FX on the surface of activated platelets; and (3) downregulating protein C anticoagulant activity through binding to the endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR). Studies of rFVIIa and rFVIIa variants in murine models demonstrate that platelet-dependent activity is sufficient for hemostatic efficacy. Dosing levels required in clinical practice are most consistent with a platelet-dependent mechanism of action. However, <em>in vivo</em> models also suggest that pathways involving EPCR binding contribute to rFVIIa hemostatic activity. Eptacog beta displays increased platelet- and EPCR-dependent endothelial cell binding compared to eptacog alfa. Thus, the relative contribution of these mechanisms to the overall hemostatic efficacy of eptacog alfa and eptacog beta may differ. Further research is required to assess the clinical relevance of these differences. A better understanding of the mechanisms by which rFVIIa promotes hemostasis in patients will provide insights when evaluating clinical outcomes of safety and efficacy for innovative bypassing therapies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20893,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":"9 1","pages":"Article 102670"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recombinant factor VIIa: new insights into the mechanism of action through product innovation\",\"authors\":\"Miguel A. Escobar ,&nbsp;Maureane Hoffman ,&nbsp;Giancarlo Castaman ,&nbsp;Cedric Hermans ,&nbsp;Johnny Mahlangu ,&nbsp;Johannes Oldenburg ,&nbsp;Charles L. Percy ,&nbsp;Mark T. Reding ,&nbsp;Amy D. Shapiro ,&nbsp;Steven W. Pipe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Management of bleeding in persons with hemophilia and inhibitors involves treatment with bypassing agents, including recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). Two rFVIIa products are commercially approved for use in the United States and the European Union. Eptacog alfa and eptacog beta share the same amino acid sequence but differ in posttranslational modifications. Although rFVIIa has been used to manage bleeding in persons with hemophilia and inhibitors for over 30 years, its mechanisms of action is still being studied. <em>In vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> studies have suggested that rFVIIa could promote hemostasis by (1) increasing tissue factor-dependent activation of factor (F)X (FX); (2) directly activating FX on the surface of activated platelets; and (3) downregulating protein C anticoagulant activity through binding to the endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR). Studies of rFVIIa and rFVIIa variants in murine models demonstrate that platelet-dependent activity is sufficient for hemostatic efficacy. Dosing levels required in clinical practice are most consistent with a platelet-dependent mechanism of action. However, <em>in vivo</em> models also suggest that pathways involving EPCR binding contribute to rFVIIa hemostatic activity. Eptacog beta displays increased platelet- and EPCR-dependent endothelial cell binding compared to eptacog alfa. Thus, the relative contribution of these mechanisms to the overall hemostatic efficacy of eptacog alfa and eptacog beta may differ. Further research is required to assess the clinical relevance of these differences. A better understanding of the mechanisms by which rFVIIa promotes hemostasis in patients will provide insights when evaluating clinical outcomes of safety and efficacy for innovative bypassing therapies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 102670\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924003650\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924003650","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血友病和抑制剂患者出血的管理涉及使用旁路剂治疗,包括重组活化因子VII (rFVIIa)。两种rFVIIa产品在美国和欧盟被商业批准使用。Eptacog α和Eptacog β具有相同的氨基酸序列,但在翻译后修饰上有所不同。尽管rFVIIa用于血友病患者和抑制剂的出血治疗已有30多年的历史,但其作用机制仍在研究中。体外和体内研究表明,rFVIIa可以通过(1)增加组织因子依赖性因子(F)X (FX)的激活来促进止血;(2)直接激活活化血小板表面的FX;(3)通过与内皮蛋白C受体(EPCR)结合下调蛋白C抗凝活性。在小鼠模型中对rFVIIa和rFVIIa变异体的研究表明,血小板依赖性活性足以产生止血效果。临床实践所需的剂量水平与血小板依赖的作用机制最为一致。然而,体内模型也表明,涉及EPCR结合的途径有助于rFVIIa止血活性。与Eptacog α相比,Eptacog β显示血小板和epcr依赖性内皮细胞结合增加。因此,这些机制对eptacog α和eptacog β的整体止血功效的相对贡献可能不同。需要进一步的研究来评估这些差异的临床相关性。更好地了解rFVIIa促进患者止血的机制将为评估创新旁路治疗的安全性和有效性的临床结果提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recombinant factor VIIa: new insights into the mechanism of action through product innovation
Management of bleeding in persons with hemophilia and inhibitors involves treatment with bypassing agents, including recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). Two rFVIIa products are commercially approved for use in the United States and the European Union. Eptacog alfa and eptacog beta share the same amino acid sequence but differ in posttranslational modifications. Although rFVIIa has been used to manage bleeding in persons with hemophilia and inhibitors for over 30 years, its mechanisms of action is still being studied. In vitro and in vivo studies have suggested that rFVIIa could promote hemostasis by (1) increasing tissue factor-dependent activation of factor (F)X (FX); (2) directly activating FX on the surface of activated platelets; and (3) downregulating protein C anticoagulant activity through binding to the endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR). Studies of rFVIIa and rFVIIa variants in murine models demonstrate that platelet-dependent activity is sufficient for hemostatic efficacy. Dosing levels required in clinical practice are most consistent with a platelet-dependent mechanism of action. However, in vivo models also suggest that pathways involving EPCR binding contribute to rFVIIa hemostatic activity. Eptacog beta displays increased platelet- and EPCR-dependent endothelial cell binding compared to eptacog alfa. Thus, the relative contribution of these mechanisms to the overall hemostatic efficacy of eptacog alfa and eptacog beta may differ. Further research is required to assess the clinical relevance of these differences. A better understanding of the mechanisms by which rFVIIa promotes hemostasis in patients will provide insights when evaluating clinical outcomes of safety and efficacy for innovative bypassing therapies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
212
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信