大学生反兴奋剂教育效果的系统评价

Adam R. Nicholls , Lambros Lazuras , Michael Petrou , Ornella Corazza , Carlos Santos , António Júlio Nunes , Michał Rynkowski , João F. Martins , Thomas Zandonai , Uta Kühn , Łukasz Tota
{"title":"大学生反兴奋剂教育效果的系统评价","authors":"Adam R. Nicholls ,&nbsp;Lambros Lazuras ,&nbsp;Michael Petrou ,&nbsp;Ornella Corazza ,&nbsp;Carlos Santos ,&nbsp;António Júlio Nunes ,&nbsp;Michał Rynkowski ,&nbsp;João F. Martins ,&nbsp;Thomas Zandonai ,&nbsp;Uta Kühn ,&nbsp;Łukasz Tota","doi":"10.1016/j.etdah.2024.100168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Doping poses a threat to the integrity of sport and the health of athletes who dope, including university students. In this systematic review, we identified the content of anti-doping education that universities provide, the disciplines mainly targeted by such education (e.g., sports science, medicine, physiotherapy, etc.), and the effectiveness of anti-doping education on university students’ anti-doping knowledge, attitudes, and other related constructs.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We systematically searched the literature using nine different search engines, manually searched relevant journals, and used pearl growing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This review included four studies comprising 1,410 university students. The content of the education programmes varied, although information about prohibited substances and rules was included in all interventions. Two studies targeted a specific cohort of students (e.g., medical and sports science students), whereas the other two recruited university students without specifying the subject discipline. All intervention programmes had a positive impact on doping knowledge, two studies had a positive effect on anti-doping attitudes, and one study impacted morality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These four studies are essential, but methodological limitations mean that better-designed education interventions for university students are required. Researchers could assess the effectiveness of education interventions on anti-doping knowledge and key psycho-social variables among this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72899,"journal":{"name":"Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review on the effectiveness of anti-doping education for university students\",\"authors\":\"Adam R. Nicholls ,&nbsp;Lambros Lazuras ,&nbsp;Michael Petrou ,&nbsp;Ornella Corazza ,&nbsp;Carlos Santos ,&nbsp;António Júlio Nunes ,&nbsp;Michał Rynkowski ,&nbsp;João F. Martins ,&nbsp;Thomas Zandonai ,&nbsp;Uta Kühn ,&nbsp;Łukasz Tota\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.etdah.2024.100168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Doping poses a threat to the integrity of sport and the health of athletes who dope, including university students. In this systematic review, we identified the content of anti-doping education that universities provide, the disciplines mainly targeted by such education (e.g., sports science, medicine, physiotherapy, etc.), and the effectiveness of anti-doping education on university students’ anti-doping knowledge, attitudes, and other related constructs.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We systematically searched the literature using nine different search engines, manually searched relevant journals, and used pearl growing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This review included four studies comprising 1,410 university students. The content of the education programmes varied, although information about prohibited substances and rules was included in all interventions. Two studies targeted a specific cohort of students (e.g., medical and sports science students), whereas the other two recruited university students without specifying the subject discipline. All intervention programmes had a positive impact on doping knowledge, two studies had a positive effect on anti-doping attitudes, and one study impacted morality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These four studies are essential, but methodological limitations mean that better-designed education interventions for university students are required. Researchers could assess the effectiveness of education interventions on anti-doping knowledge and key psycho-social variables among this population.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667118224000278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667118224000278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

兴奋剂对体育运动的完整性和服用兴奋剂的运动员(包括大学生)的健康构成威胁。在本系统综述中,我们确定了高校开展反兴奋剂教育的内容,反兴奋剂教育的主要对象学科(如体育科学、医学、理疗等),以及反兴奋剂教育对大学生反兴奋剂知识、态度和其他相关建构的影响。方法使用9种不同的搜索引擎系统检索文献,人工检索相关期刊,采用珍珠生长法。结果本综述纳入4项研究,共1410名大学生。教育方案的内容各不相同,但所有干预措施都包括了关于违禁物质和规则的信息。两项研究针对的是一群特定的学生(例如,医学和体育科学专业的学生),而另外两项研究招募的是大学生,但没有指定学科。所有干预方案都对兴奋剂知识有积极影响,两项研究对反兴奋剂态度有积极影响,一项研究对道德有影响。这四项研究是必要的,但方法上的局限性意味着需要更好地设计大学生教育干预措施。研究人员可以评估反兴奋剂知识和关键心理社会变量的教育干预在这一人群中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review on the effectiveness of anti-doping education for university students

Background

Doping poses a threat to the integrity of sport and the health of athletes who dope, including university students. In this systematic review, we identified the content of anti-doping education that universities provide, the disciplines mainly targeted by such education (e.g., sports science, medicine, physiotherapy, etc.), and the effectiveness of anti-doping education on university students’ anti-doping knowledge, attitudes, and other related constructs.

Method

We systematically searched the literature using nine different search engines, manually searched relevant journals, and used pearl growing.

Results

This review included four studies comprising 1,410 university students. The content of the education programmes varied, although information about prohibited substances and rules was included in all interventions. Two studies targeted a specific cohort of students (e.g., medical and sports science students), whereas the other two recruited university students without specifying the subject discipline. All intervention programmes had a positive impact on doping knowledge, two studies had a positive effect on anti-doping attitudes, and one study impacted morality.

Conclusions

These four studies are essential, but methodological limitations mean that better-designed education interventions for university students are required. Researchers could assess the effectiveness of education interventions on anti-doping knowledge and key psycho-social variables among this population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health
Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Forensic Medicine, Drug Discovery, Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (General)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信