通过黑暗四分体特征分析技术促进的性暴力倾向

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Constantinos M. Kokkinos , Theano Papioti , Ioanna Voulgaridou
{"title":"通过黑暗四分体特征分析技术促进的性暴力倾向","authors":"Constantinos M. Kokkinos ,&nbsp;Theano Papioti ,&nbsp;Ioanna Voulgaridou","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the complex interaction between dark personality traits and technology-facilitated sexual violence (TFSV) proclivity, using an online anonymous questionnaire completed by 1735 Greek university students (611 men, aged 18–55; <em>M</em> = 21.89, <em>SD</em> = 6.18). Latent Profile Analysis identified four distinct personality profiles based on participants' scores on the Dark Tetrad traits: manipulative narcissists (high Machiavellianism and narcissism), cold strategists (high psychopathy and moderate Machiavellianism), dominant egocentrics (high sadism and narcissism), and balanced individuals (low across all traits). Findings revealed significant differences in TFSV proclivity across profiles. Dominant egocentrics exhibited the highest levels of TFSV proclivity and its dimensions, including acceptance and enjoyment of TFSV, indicating a strong link between sadism and malicious digital behaviors. Manipulative narcissists and cold strategists demonstrated higher levels of acceptance of TFSV, reflecting tendencies toward manipulation and impulsivity. In contrast, balanced individuals reported significantly lower proclivity across all dimensions, highlighting a healthier personality profile. These findings provide valuable insights into the psychological underpinnings of harmful digital behaviors and underscore the importance of targeted strategies to promote digital ethics and responsible online behavior.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 108565"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profiling proclivity for technology-facilitated sexual violence through Dark Tetrad traits\",\"authors\":\"Constantinos M. Kokkinos ,&nbsp;Theano Papioti ,&nbsp;Ioanna Voulgaridou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the complex interaction between dark personality traits and technology-facilitated sexual violence (TFSV) proclivity, using an online anonymous questionnaire completed by 1735 Greek university students (611 men, aged 18–55; <em>M</em> = 21.89, <em>SD</em> = 6.18). Latent Profile Analysis identified four distinct personality profiles based on participants' scores on the Dark Tetrad traits: manipulative narcissists (high Machiavellianism and narcissism), cold strategists (high psychopathy and moderate Machiavellianism), dominant egocentrics (high sadism and narcissism), and balanced individuals (low across all traits). Findings revealed significant differences in TFSV proclivity across profiles. Dominant egocentrics exhibited the highest levels of TFSV proclivity and its dimensions, including acceptance and enjoyment of TFSV, indicating a strong link between sadism and malicious digital behaviors. Manipulative narcissists and cold strategists demonstrated higher levels of acceptance of TFSV, reflecting tendencies toward manipulation and impulsivity. In contrast, balanced individuals reported significantly lower proclivity across all dimensions, highlighting a healthier personality profile. These findings provide valuable insights into the psychological underpinnings of harmful digital behaviors and underscore the importance of targeted strategies to promote digital ethics and responsible online behavior.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108565\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225000123\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225000123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过对1735名希腊大学生(611名男性,年龄18-55岁;M = 21.89, sd = 6.18)。潜在轮廓分析根据参与者在黑暗四人格特征上的得分确定了四种不同的人格特征:操纵性自恋者(高度马基雅维利主义和自恋)、冷酷战略家(高度精神病和中度马基雅维利主义)、主导型自我中心者(高度虐待狂和自恋)和平衡型个体(所有特征都很低)。研究结果显示,不同基因型的TFSV倾向存在显著差异。显性自我中心者表现出最高水平的TFSV倾向及其维度,包括对TFSV的接受和享受,表明虐待狂与恶意数字行为之间存在密切联系。操控型自恋者和冷酷战略家对TFSV的接受程度更高,反映出操控和冲动的倾向。相比之下,平衡的人在所有方面的倾向都明显较低,突出了更健康的人格特征。这些发现为有害数字行为的心理基础提供了有价值的见解,并强调了有针对性的战略对促进数字道德和负责任的在线行为的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Profiling proclivity for technology-facilitated sexual violence through Dark Tetrad traits
This study examines the complex interaction between dark personality traits and technology-facilitated sexual violence (TFSV) proclivity, using an online anonymous questionnaire completed by 1735 Greek university students (611 men, aged 18–55; M = 21.89, SD = 6.18). Latent Profile Analysis identified four distinct personality profiles based on participants' scores on the Dark Tetrad traits: manipulative narcissists (high Machiavellianism and narcissism), cold strategists (high psychopathy and moderate Machiavellianism), dominant egocentrics (high sadism and narcissism), and balanced individuals (low across all traits). Findings revealed significant differences in TFSV proclivity across profiles. Dominant egocentrics exhibited the highest levels of TFSV proclivity and its dimensions, including acceptance and enjoyment of TFSV, indicating a strong link between sadism and malicious digital behaviors. Manipulative narcissists and cold strategists demonstrated higher levels of acceptance of TFSV, reflecting tendencies toward manipulation and impulsivity. In contrast, balanced individuals reported significantly lower proclivity across all dimensions, highlighting a healthier personality profile. These findings provide valuable insights into the psychological underpinnings of harmful digital behaviors and underscore the importance of targeted strategies to promote digital ethics and responsible online behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信