技术评价与后常态科学

IF 3 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Tom Børsen
{"title":"技术评价与后常态科学","authors":"Tom Børsen","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2024.103515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since the 1970’ies, a central tool to convey policy advice on technological matters has been Technology Assessment (TA). Many different TA models exist, and this paper provides and overview of some important ones: Normal TA, Rational TA, Ethical TA, Hermeneutical TA, Participatory TA, and Constructivist TA. A central question investigated here is how existing TA models relate to Postnormal Science (PNS). The output is a comparison of how the presented TA models engage with PNS sensitivities that are translated into formats that support the comparison: Uncertainty management is translated into an outline of whether the TA models relate to existing, near or distant future technologies where uncertainties are typically low, medium low / high, or high. Decision stakes are translated into an overview of which stakeholder roles are invited into the TA process, and how the different TA models scaffold work across interests and perspectives through work in different forms of Extended peer communities. The comparison also addresses how ethics is attended in the TA-models. In conclusion the paper argues that it is not possible to link one TA model to PNS and to say that one TA model is postnormal. Postnormal TAs will be set up from case to case picking and collecting inspiration from different TA models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 103515"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology assessment and postnormal science\",\"authors\":\"Tom Børsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.futures.2024.103515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Since the 1970’ies, a central tool to convey policy advice on technological matters has been Technology Assessment (TA). Many different TA models exist, and this paper provides and overview of some important ones: Normal TA, Rational TA, Ethical TA, Hermeneutical TA, Participatory TA, and Constructivist TA. A central question investigated here is how existing TA models relate to Postnormal Science (PNS). The output is a comparison of how the presented TA models engage with PNS sensitivities that are translated into formats that support the comparison: Uncertainty management is translated into an outline of whether the TA models relate to existing, near or distant future technologies where uncertainties are typically low, medium low / high, or high. Decision stakes are translated into an overview of which stakeholder roles are invited into the TA process, and how the different TA models scaffold work across interests and perspectives through work in different forms of Extended peer communities. The comparison also addresses how ethics is attended in the TA-models. In conclusion the paper argues that it is not possible to link one TA model to PNS and to say that one TA model is postnormal. Postnormal TAs will be set up from case to case picking and collecting inspiration from different TA models.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Futures\",\"volume\":\"166 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103515\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Futures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328724001988\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328724001988","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自20世纪70年代以来,技术评估一直是传达有关技术问题的政策建议的主要工具。目前存在着许多不同的教学模式,本文概述了几种重要的教学模式:常规教学模式、理性教学模式、伦理教学模式、解释性教学模式、参与性教学模式和建构主义教学模式。这里研究的一个中心问题是现有的TA模型如何与后常态科学(PNS)相关。输出是对所呈现的TA模型如何与PNS敏感性进行比较,并将其转换为支持比较的格式:不确定性管理被转换为TA模型是否与现有、近期或遥远的未来技术相关的大纲,其中不确定性通常为低、中低/高或高。决策风险被转化为一个概述,概述了哪些利益相关者角色被邀请到TA过程中,以及不同的TA模型如何通过不同形式的扩展对等社区的工作来支撑跨利益和视角的工作。这一比较还讨论了ta模型中伦理是如何参与的。总之,本文认为不可能将一个TA模型与PNS联系起来,并说一个TA模型是后常态。后常态助教将根据不同的案例建立,并从不同的助教模型中收集灵感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technology assessment and postnormal science
Since the 1970’ies, a central tool to convey policy advice on technological matters has been Technology Assessment (TA). Many different TA models exist, and this paper provides and overview of some important ones: Normal TA, Rational TA, Ethical TA, Hermeneutical TA, Participatory TA, and Constructivist TA. A central question investigated here is how existing TA models relate to Postnormal Science (PNS). The output is a comparison of how the presented TA models engage with PNS sensitivities that are translated into formats that support the comparison: Uncertainty management is translated into an outline of whether the TA models relate to existing, near or distant future technologies where uncertainties are typically low, medium low / high, or high. Decision stakes are translated into an overview of which stakeholder roles are invited into the TA process, and how the different TA models scaffold work across interests and perspectives through work in different forms of Extended peer communities. The comparison also addresses how ethics is attended in the TA-models. In conclusion the paper argues that it is not possible to link one TA model to PNS and to say that one TA model is postnormal. Postnormal TAs will be set up from case to case picking and collecting inspiration from different TA models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Futures
Futures Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信