基于mcs的巷道工作面稳定性概率分析的高效准确方法

IF 3.3 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Bin Li, Yong-Kai Shen, Yuan-Sheng Lan
{"title":"基于mcs的巷道工作面稳定性概率分析的高效准确方法","authors":"Bin Li,&nbsp;Yong-Kai Shen,&nbsp;Yuan-Sheng Lan","doi":"10.1016/j.sandf.2024.101563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper proposes two strategies to perform efficient and accurate MCS-based probabilistic analysis of tunnel face stability. The first strategy takes the samples that have been evaluated by three-dimensional (3D) numerical simulations as classifiers to evaluate the MCS samples generated from the statistical parameters of uncertain variables. The number of 3D simulations can be significantly reduced to only 1 % or even 1‰ because most MCS samples are evaluated by the classifiers. This method is accurate because no approximation has been made in the evaluation process. The second strategy uses a previously established training dataset to construct an ensemble of metamodels to classify the MCS samples. Backpropagation Neural Network (BP) is utilized to construct a regression metamodel to predict the safety factors of each sample; the samples that are predicted to be near the limit state will be further evaluated by an adaptive classification metamodel constructed by the combination of K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). KNN is used to search <em>k</em> training samples that have the smallest distances with the unknown sample, whereas SVM is used to construct a classification model to classify this sample using the <em>k</em> training samples. This strategy is much more efficient since a probabilistic analysis can be completed within a few seconds. Several illustrative examples are used to demonstrate the applications. Results show that the failure probabilities predicted by the ensemble of metamodels compare well with those determined according to direct MCS-based 3D numerical simulations, implying that the ensemble of metamodels is also accurate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21857,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Foundations","volume":"65 1","pages":"Article 101563"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient and accurate methodologies for MCS-based probabilistic analysis of tunnel face stability\",\"authors\":\"Bin Li,&nbsp;Yong-Kai Shen,&nbsp;Yuan-Sheng Lan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sandf.2024.101563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper proposes two strategies to perform efficient and accurate MCS-based probabilistic analysis of tunnel face stability. The first strategy takes the samples that have been evaluated by three-dimensional (3D) numerical simulations as classifiers to evaluate the MCS samples generated from the statistical parameters of uncertain variables. The number of 3D simulations can be significantly reduced to only 1 % or even 1‰ because most MCS samples are evaluated by the classifiers. This method is accurate because no approximation has been made in the evaluation process. The second strategy uses a previously established training dataset to construct an ensemble of metamodels to classify the MCS samples. Backpropagation Neural Network (BP) is utilized to construct a regression metamodel to predict the safety factors of each sample; the samples that are predicted to be near the limit state will be further evaluated by an adaptive classification metamodel constructed by the combination of K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). KNN is used to search <em>k</em> training samples that have the smallest distances with the unknown sample, whereas SVM is used to construct a classification model to classify this sample using the <em>k</em> training samples. This strategy is much more efficient since a probabilistic analysis can be completed within a few seconds. Several illustrative examples are used to demonstrate the applications. Results show that the failure probabilities predicted by the ensemble of metamodels compare well with those determined according to direct MCS-based 3D numerical simulations, implying that the ensemble of metamodels is also accurate.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624001410\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624001410","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了两种有效、准确的基于mcs的巷道工作面稳定性概率分析策略。第一种策略是将三维数值模拟评估的样本作为分类器,对不确定变量统计参数生成的MCS样本进行评估。由于大多数MCS样本是由分类器评估的,因此3D模拟的数量可以显著减少到仅1%甚至1‰。这种方法是准确的,因为在评估过程中没有进行近似。第二种策略使用先前建立的训练数据集构建元模型集合来对MCS样本进行分类。利用反向传播神经网络(BP)构建回归元模型,预测各样本的安全系数;将k -最近邻(KNN)和支持向量机(SVM)相结合构建自适应分类元模型,对预测到接近极限状态的样本进行进一步评估。使用KNN搜索与未知样本距离最小的k个训练样本,使用SVM构建分类模型,利用这k个训练样本对未知样本进行分类。这种策略更有效,因为概率分析可以在几秒钟内完成。使用了几个说明性示例来演示应用程序。结果表明,元模型集合预测的失效概率与直接基于mcs的三维数值模拟计算的失效概率比较好,表明元模型集合也是准确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficient and accurate methodologies for MCS-based probabilistic analysis of tunnel face stability
This paper proposes two strategies to perform efficient and accurate MCS-based probabilistic analysis of tunnel face stability. The first strategy takes the samples that have been evaluated by three-dimensional (3D) numerical simulations as classifiers to evaluate the MCS samples generated from the statistical parameters of uncertain variables. The number of 3D simulations can be significantly reduced to only 1 % or even 1‰ because most MCS samples are evaluated by the classifiers. This method is accurate because no approximation has been made in the evaluation process. The second strategy uses a previously established training dataset to construct an ensemble of metamodels to classify the MCS samples. Backpropagation Neural Network (BP) is utilized to construct a regression metamodel to predict the safety factors of each sample; the samples that are predicted to be near the limit state will be further evaluated by an adaptive classification metamodel constructed by the combination of K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). KNN is used to search k training samples that have the smallest distances with the unknown sample, whereas SVM is used to construct a classification model to classify this sample using the k training samples. This strategy is much more efficient since a probabilistic analysis can be completed within a few seconds. Several illustrative examples are used to demonstrate the applications. Results show that the failure probabilities predicted by the ensemble of metamodels compare well with those determined according to direct MCS-based 3D numerical simulations, implying that the ensemble of metamodels is also accurate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soils and Foundations
Soils and Foundations 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soils and Foundations is one of the leading journals in the field of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It is the official journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)., The journal publishes a variety of original research paper, technical reports, technical notes, as well as the state-of-the-art reports upon invitation by the Editor, in the fields of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, and environmental geotechnics. Since the publication of Volume 1, No.1 issue in June 1960, Soils and Foundations will celebrate the 60th anniversary in the year of 2020. Soils and Foundations welcomes theoretical as well as practical work associated with the aforementioned field(s). Case studies that describe the original and interdisciplinary work applicable to geotechnical engineering are particularly encouraged. Discussions to each of the published articles are also welcomed in order to provide an avenue in which opinions of peers may be fed back or exchanged. In providing latest expertise on a specific topic, one issue out of six per year on average was allocated to include selected papers from the International Symposia which were held in Japan as well as overseas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信