PS和PES及其磺化形式的防污性能和去除率比较研究

IF 3.7 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Ibrahim Hotan Alsohaimi
{"title":"PS和PES及其磺化形式的防污性能和去除率比较研究","authors":"Ibrahim Hotan Alsohaimi","doi":"10.1016/j.jksus.2024.103576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, novel hybrid ultrafiltration (UF) membranes were developed using polyethersulfone (PES), polysulfone (PS), and their sulfonated counterparts (SPES and SPS) to enhance water flux and antifouling properties. FTIR and XRD analyses validated the successful incorporation of sulfonate groups and structural changes, while SEM images revealed more porous and uniform membrane structures. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed enhanced thermal stability for the sulfonated membranes. Mechanical property evaluations demonstrated that the sulfonated membranes maintained good tensile strength and flexibility. Water uptake and porosity measurements indicated increased hydrophilicity and porosity for SPES and SPS membranes compared to their pristine forms. The pure water flux of SPES (130 L/m<sup>2</sup>·h) is significantly higher compared to PES (110 L/m<sup>2</sup>·h). The sulfonated membranes (SPS and SPES) exhibit significantly enhanced antifouling properties, as demonstrated by the improved flux recovery ratios (FRR) for SA, BSA, and HA compared to their non-sulfonated counterparts (PS and PES), reaching up to 75 % for SPES. The rejection performance for BSA, HA, and SA solutions showed that SPES membranes achieved 95 %, 90 %, and 92 % rejection rates, respectively, compared to 80 %, 75 %, and 70 % for PS membranes. Fouling resistance tests using BSA, HA, and SA solutions showed that SPES and SPS membranes had significantly higher flux and lower fouling tendencies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of King Saud University - Science","volume":"36 11","pages":"Article 103576"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of PS and PES and their sulfonated forms in antifouling behavior and rejection efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Ibrahim Hotan Alsohaimi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jksus.2024.103576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this study, novel hybrid ultrafiltration (UF) membranes were developed using polyethersulfone (PES), polysulfone (PS), and their sulfonated counterparts (SPES and SPS) to enhance water flux and antifouling properties. FTIR and XRD analyses validated the successful incorporation of sulfonate groups and structural changes, while SEM images revealed more porous and uniform membrane structures. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed enhanced thermal stability for the sulfonated membranes. Mechanical property evaluations demonstrated that the sulfonated membranes maintained good tensile strength and flexibility. Water uptake and porosity measurements indicated increased hydrophilicity and porosity for SPES and SPS membranes compared to their pristine forms. The pure water flux of SPES (130 L/m<sup>2</sup>·h) is significantly higher compared to PES (110 L/m<sup>2</sup>·h). The sulfonated membranes (SPS and SPES) exhibit significantly enhanced antifouling properties, as demonstrated by the improved flux recovery ratios (FRR) for SA, BSA, and HA compared to their non-sulfonated counterparts (PS and PES), reaching up to 75 % for SPES. The rejection performance for BSA, HA, and SA solutions showed that SPES membranes achieved 95 %, 90 %, and 92 % rejection rates, respectively, compared to 80 %, 75 %, and 70 % for PS membranes. Fouling resistance tests using BSA, HA, and SA solutions showed that SPES and SPS membranes had significantly higher flux and lower fouling tendencies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of King Saud University - Science\",\"volume\":\"36 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 103576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of King Saud University - Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1018364724004889\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of King Saud University - Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1018364724004889","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用聚醚砜(PES)、聚砜(PS)及其磺化产物(spe和SPS)制备了新型超滤膜(UF),以提高水通量和防污性能。FTIR和XRD分析证实了磺酸基的成功结合和结构变化,而SEM图像显示了更多孔和均匀的膜结构。热重分析(TGA)表明磺化膜的热稳定性增强。力学性能评价表明,磺化膜保持良好的拉伸强度和柔韧性。吸水率和孔隙率测量表明,与原始形式相比,SPS和SPS膜的亲水性和孔隙率增加。spe的纯水通量(130 L/m2·h)显著高于PES (110 L/m2·h)。磺化膜(SPS和spe)的防污性能显著增强,与非磺化膜(PS和PES)相比,SA、BSA和HA的通量回收率(FRR)有所提高,spe的通量回收率高达75%。对BSA、HA和SA溶液的去除率分别为95%、90%和92%,而PS膜的去除率分别为80%、75%和70%。用BSA、HA和SA溶液进行的抗污性测试表明,SPES和SPS膜的通量显著提高,污染倾向较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative study of PS and PES and their sulfonated forms in antifouling behavior and rejection efficiency

Comparative study of PS and PES and their sulfonated forms in antifouling behavior and rejection efficiency
In this study, novel hybrid ultrafiltration (UF) membranes were developed using polyethersulfone (PES), polysulfone (PS), and their sulfonated counterparts (SPES and SPS) to enhance water flux and antifouling properties. FTIR and XRD analyses validated the successful incorporation of sulfonate groups and structural changes, while SEM images revealed more porous and uniform membrane structures. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed enhanced thermal stability for the sulfonated membranes. Mechanical property evaluations demonstrated that the sulfonated membranes maintained good tensile strength and flexibility. Water uptake and porosity measurements indicated increased hydrophilicity and porosity for SPES and SPS membranes compared to their pristine forms. The pure water flux of SPES (130 L/m2·h) is significantly higher compared to PES (110 L/m2·h). The sulfonated membranes (SPS and SPES) exhibit significantly enhanced antifouling properties, as demonstrated by the improved flux recovery ratios (FRR) for SA, BSA, and HA compared to their non-sulfonated counterparts (PS and PES), reaching up to 75 % for SPES. The rejection performance for BSA, HA, and SA solutions showed that SPES membranes achieved 95 %, 90 %, and 92 % rejection rates, respectively, compared to 80 %, 75 %, and 70 % for PS membranes. Fouling resistance tests using BSA, HA, and SA solutions showed that SPES and SPS membranes had significantly higher flux and lower fouling tendencies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of King Saud University - Science
Journal of King Saud University - Science Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
642
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Journal of King Saud University – Science is an official refereed publication of King Saud University and the publishing services is provided by Elsevier. It publishes peer-reviewed research articles in the fields of physics, astronomy, mathematics, statistics, chemistry, biochemistry, earth sciences, life and environmental sciences on the basis of scientific originality and interdisciplinary interest. It is devoted primarily to research papers but short communications, reviews and book reviews are also included. The editorial board and associated editors, composed of prominent scientists from around the world, are representative of the disciplines covered by the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信