Comparative time series analysis of SARIMA, LSTM, and GRU models for global SF6 emission management system

To maintain the balance of the atmosphere, the amount of change in greenhouse gas emissions must be under control. In order to create a management system and take forward-looking steps in this regard, there is no concrete data other than prediction models today. The success of prediction methods is better understood by comparing multiple methods. This research estimates the changes in the emissions of Sulfur Hexafluoride gas (SF₆) in the atmosphere using Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Model (SARIMA), Long-Short Term Memory Neural Network (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) forecast models and compares their accuracies. Focusing on monthly SF₆ emission values Between 1998; 2023, time series analysis was performed to predict future emission figures. The actual values and forecast results were compared and evaluated with performance criteria such as R², RMSE, NSE, MAE and MAPE%. The findings of this research highlight a continuous upward trend in SF₆ emissions and project that emission levels could approximately double from current levels by 2050. During the analysis process, all three methods performed well in estimating global SF₆ gas emissions. The LSTM model generally outperformed SARIMA and GRU models, having the lowest MAPE (0.003%), MAE (0.0003), RMSE (0.0003), and R² (1) values. It also exhibited very high predictive success with an NSE value of 0.9991. Therefore, it was determined to be the most suitable estimation method with the least error. The aim of this study is to contribute scientifically to the reduction strategies of SF₆ emissions.