泛读与精读线下教学中学习者阅读动机、自我评价、批判性思维和学业幸福感的反映:以自我决定理论为重点

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL
Youhong Lin
{"title":"泛读与精读线下教学中学习者阅读动机、自我评价、批判性思维和学业幸福感的反映:以自我决定理论为重点","authors":"Youhong Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, different researchers have been paying increasing attention to self-determination theory (henceforth, SDT). This study explores the impact of extensive and intensive reading instruction on learners' motivation to read, self-assessment, critical thinking, and academic well-being through the lens of SDT. Conducted at a large university in China, the research involved 126 participants, equally distributed by gender and aged between 18 and 29, who were enrolled in a General English Course. The participants were divided into three groups: two experimental groups and a control group. The first experimental group received offline extensive reading instruction, while the second experimental group received offline intensive reading instruction. The control group, on the other hand, received traditional teacher-fronted instruction with minimal emphasis on reading. Data collection involved narrative frames and semi-structured interviews, with a thematic analysis revealing significant differences in outcomes between the groups. The first experimental group showed notable improvements in their motivation to read, self-assessment abilities, and critical thinking skills. The second experimental group demonstrated enhanced critical thinking skills and academic well-being. In contrast, the control group exhibited no significant improvements across the studied dimensions. These findings certify the transformative potential of alternative reading instructional approaches in fostering critical educational outcomes. By situating these results within the framework of SDT, the study highlights the importance of supporting learners’ intrinsic motivation through tailored instructional strategies. These insights hold practical implications for educators, advocating for the adoption of extensive and intensive reading instruction to enhance learners’ academic and cognitive development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47305,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Motivation","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 102093"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A reflection of learners’ motivation to read, self-assessment, critical thinking, and academic well-being in extensive and intensive reading offline instruction: A focus on self-determination theory\",\"authors\":\"Youhong Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In recent years, different researchers have been paying increasing attention to self-determination theory (henceforth, SDT). This study explores the impact of extensive and intensive reading instruction on learners' motivation to read, self-assessment, critical thinking, and academic well-being through the lens of SDT. Conducted at a large university in China, the research involved 126 participants, equally distributed by gender and aged between 18 and 29, who were enrolled in a General English Course. The participants were divided into three groups: two experimental groups and a control group. The first experimental group received offline extensive reading instruction, while the second experimental group received offline intensive reading instruction. The control group, on the other hand, received traditional teacher-fronted instruction with minimal emphasis on reading. Data collection involved narrative frames and semi-structured interviews, with a thematic analysis revealing significant differences in outcomes between the groups. The first experimental group showed notable improvements in their motivation to read, self-assessment abilities, and critical thinking skills. The second experimental group demonstrated enhanced critical thinking skills and academic well-being. In contrast, the control group exhibited no significant improvements across the studied dimensions. These findings certify the transformative potential of alternative reading instructional approaches in fostering critical educational outcomes. By situating these results within the framework of SDT, the study highlights the importance of supporting learners’ intrinsic motivation through tailored instructional strategies. These insights hold practical implications for educators, advocating for the adoption of extensive and intensive reading instruction to enhance learners’ academic and cognitive development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Motivation\",\"volume\":\"89 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Motivation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969024001358\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Motivation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969024001358","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,不同的研究者越来越关注自我决定理论(以下简称SDT)。本研究通过SDT的视角探讨了泛读和精读教学对学习者阅读动机、自我评价、批判性思维和学业幸福感的影响。这项在中国一所大型大学进行的研究涉及126名参与者,按性别平均分布,年龄在18岁至29岁之间,他们都参加了普通英语课程。参与者被分为三组:两个实验组和一个对照组。第一实验组接受离线泛读指导,第二实验组接受离线精读指导。另一方面,对照组接受传统的教师指导,很少强调阅读。数据收集包括叙述框架和半结构化访谈,并通过专题分析揭示各组之间结果的显著差异。第一个实验组在阅读动机、自我评估能力和批判性思维能力方面都有显著提高。第二个实验组表现出更强的批判性思维能力和学术幸福感。相比之下,对照组在所有研究维度上都没有明显的改善。这些发现证明了替代阅读教学方法在培养关键教育成果方面的变革潜力。通过将这些结果置于SDT的框架内,该研究强调了通过量身定制的教学策略来支持学习者内在动机的重要性。这些见解对教育工作者具有现实意义,提倡采用泛读和精读教学来促进学习者的学术和认知发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A reflection of learners’ motivation to read, self-assessment, critical thinking, and academic well-being in extensive and intensive reading offline instruction: A focus on self-determination theory
In recent years, different researchers have been paying increasing attention to self-determination theory (henceforth, SDT). This study explores the impact of extensive and intensive reading instruction on learners' motivation to read, self-assessment, critical thinking, and academic well-being through the lens of SDT. Conducted at a large university in China, the research involved 126 participants, equally distributed by gender and aged between 18 and 29, who were enrolled in a General English Course. The participants were divided into three groups: two experimental groups and a control group. The first experimental group received offline extensive reading instruction, while the second experimental group received offline intensive reading instruction. The control group, on the other hand, received traditional teacher-fronted instruction with minimal emphasis on reading. Data collection involved narrative frames and semi-structured interviews, with a thematic analysis revealing significant differences in outcomes between the groups. The first experimental group showed notable improvements in their motivation to read, self-assessment abilities, and critical thinking skills. The second experimental group demonstrated enhanced critical thinking skills and academic well-being. In contrast, the control group exhibited no significant improvements across the studied dimensions. These findings certify the transformative potential of alternative reading instructional approaches in fostering critical educational outcomes. By situating these results within the framework of SDT, the study highlights the importance of supporting learners’ intrinsic motivation through tailored instructional strategies. These insights hold practical implications for educators, advocating for the adoption of extensive and intensive reading instruction to enhance learners’ academic and cognitive development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Learning and Motivation features original experimental research devoted to the analysis of basic phenomena and mechanisms of learning, memory, and motivation. These studies, involving either animal or human subjects, examine behavioral, biological, and evolutionary influences on the learning and motivation processes, and often report on an integrated series of experiments that advance knowledge in this field. Theoretical papers and shorter reports are also considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信