通过电子邮件请求和传递坏消息的语言缓和、作者共情和收件人个性研究

IF 1.8 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Nicolas Ruytenbeek , Thomas Holtgraves
{"title":"通过电子邮件请求和传递坏消息的语言缓和、作者共情和收件人个性研究","authors":"Nicolas Ruytenbeek ,&nbsp;Thomas Holtgraves","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.01.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To this day, the extent to which inter-individual variables such as empathy and personality shape the realization of face-threatening speech acts remains poorly known. This research seeks to fill this gap by addressing the influence of participant empathy and recipient personality on the use of linguistic mitigation strategies, focusing on email requests and bad news in a professional context in French. The present study is in line with the new orientation in experimental pragmatic research, as it foregrounds individual variability in the assessment of and the linguistic responses to socio-contextual variables. Using an empathy quotient (EQ) questionnaire, we recruited a number of 200 participants with French as mother tongue and aged 23–50. The 40 most rigid and 40 most flexible respondents were selected for a production task in which they wrote a request email and an email bringing bad news either to a flexible or rigid recipient (2x2 design). Our analyses show that more empathic participants use more linguistic mitigation compared to less empathic participants; apologies, for instance, were more often present both in their request and bad news professional emails. We discuss these findings in the light of recent work on the role of empathy and personality in communicative behaviour.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"238 ","pages":"Pages 60-73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study of linguistic mitigation, writer empathy and recipient personality in requesting and bringing bad news via email\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Ruytenbeek ,&nbsp;Thomas Holtgraves\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.01.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To this day, the extent to which inter-individual variables such as empathy and personality shape the realization of face-threatening speech acts remains poorly known. This research seeks to fill this gap by addressing the influence of participant empathy and recipient personality on the use of linguistic mitigation strategies, focusing on email requests and bad news in a professional context in French. The present study is in line with the new orientation in experimental pragmatic research, as it foregrounds individual variability in the assessment of and the linguistic responses to socio-contextual variables. Using an empathy quotient (EQ) questionnaire, we recruited a number of 200 participants with French as mother tongue and aged 23–50. The 40 most rigid and 40 most flexible respondents were selected for a production task in which they wrote a request email and an email bringing bad news either to a flexible or rigid recipient (2x2 design). Our analyses show that more empathic participants use more linguistic mitigation compared to less empathic participants; apologies, for instance, were more often present both in their request and bad news professional emails. We discuss these findings in the light of recent work on the role of empathy and personality in communicative behaviour.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pragmatics\",\"volume\":\"238 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 60-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000104\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000104","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直到今天,个体间的变量,如共情和个性,在多大程度上塑造了威胁面部的言语行为的实现,仍然知之甚少。本研究试图通过解决参与者共情和收件人个性对语言缓解策略使用的影响来填补这一空白,重点关注法语专业背景下的电子邮件请求和坏消息。本研究符合实验语用研究的新方向,因为它突出了个体对社会语境变量的评估和语言反应的差异性。采用同理心商数(EQ)问卷,我们招募了200名以法语为母语,年龄在23-50岁之间的参与者。40个最死板和40个最灵活的受访者被选中进行生产任务,他们写一封请求电子邮件和一封电子邮件,分别给灵活或死板的收件人带来坏消息(2x2设计)。我们的分析表明,与移情较少的参与者相比,更多的移情参与者使用更多的语言缓解;例如,道歉更常出现在他们的请求和坏消息专业邮件中。我们根据最近关于共情和个性在交际行为中的作用的研究来讨论这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A study of linguistic mitigation, writer empathy and recipient personality in requesting and bringing bad news via email
To this day, the extent to which inter-individual variables such as empathy and personality shape the realization of face-threatening speech acts remains poorly known. This research seeks to fill this gap by addressing the influence of participant empathy and recipient personality on the use of linguistic mitigation strategies, focusing on email requests and bad news in a professional context in French. The present study is in line with the new orientation in experimental pragmatic research, as it foregrounds individual variability in the assessment of and the linguistic responses to socio-contextual variables. Using an empathy quotient (EQ) questionnaire, we recruited a number of 200 participants with French as mother tongue and aged 23–50. The 40 most rigid and 40 most flexible respondents were selected for a production task in which they wrote a request email and an email bringing bad news either to a flexible or rigid recipient (2x2 design). Our analyses show that more empathic participants use more linguistic mitigation compared to less empathic participants; apologies, for instance, were more often present both in their request and bad news professional emails. We discuss these findings in the light of recent work on the role of empathy and personality in communicative behaviour.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信