IF 2.2 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Anthony Piscitelli , Katharine McGowan , Liam McHugh-Russell , Sean Geobey
{"title":"The best interests of a cooperative","authors":"Anthony Piscitelli ,&nbsp;Katharine McGowan ,&nbsp;Liam McHugh-Russell ,&nbsp;Sean Geobey","doi":"10.1016/j.jcom.2024.100257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Most cooperatives are incorporated, with a board of directors who bear legal responsibility for supervising management and setting strategic direction. How should boards exercise that role? While for-profit corporate directors can turn to practical guides, academic literature, and popular non-fiction to guide their decisions, there is much less direct guidance for directors in the coops context. The paper argues that the legal duty of cooperative directors to act in the “best interest of the cooperative” is a promising conceptual starting point to develop such guidance. It then draws from for-profit corporate governance debates and the ICA Cooperative Principles to map the promise, disadvantage and limits of three broad approaches to satisfying the best interests standard: member primacy, stakeholder approaches such as the Trustee Model and the Team Production Model, and purpose-based approaches which identify the best interest of a cooperative either with its specific, formal purpose or with the purpose(s) of cooperatives more broadly.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management","volume":"13 1","pages":"Article 100257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213297X24000284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数合作社都是法人,并设有董事会,承担监督管理和制定战略方向的法律责任。董事会应该如何发挥这一作用?虽然营利性公司的董事可以求助于实用指南、学术文献和流行的非虚构作品来指导他们的决策,但在合作社的背景下,对董事的直接指导要少得多。本文认为,合作社董事按照“合作社最大利益”行事的法律义务是制定这种指导方针的一个有希望的概念起点。然后,从营利性公司治理辩论和ICA合作原则中,绘制出满足最佳利益标准的三种广泛方法的前景、缺点和局限性:成员优先、利益相关者方法,如受托人模型和团队生产模型,以及基于目的的方法,这些方法通过合作社的具体、正式目的或更广泛的合作社目的来确定合作社的最佳利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The best interests of a cooperative
Most cooperatives are incorporated, with a board of directors who bear legal responsibility for supervising management and setting strategic direction. How should boards exercise that role? While for-profit corporate directors can turn to practical guides, academic literature, and popular non-fiction to guide their decisions, there is much less direct guidance for directors in the coops context. The paper argues that the legal duty of cooperative directors to act in the “best interest of the cooperative” is a promising conceptual starting point to develop such guidance. It then draws from for-profit corporate governance debates and the ICA Cooperative Principles to map the promise, disadvantage and limits of three broad approaches to satisfying the best interests standard: member primacy, stakeholder approaches such as the Trustee Model and the Team Production Model, and purpose-based approaches which identify the best interest of a cooperative either with its specific, formal purpose or with the purpose(s) of cooperatives more broadly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信