长相、身高、工作、履历、智力和同质性在网上约会中的相对重要性:一项联合分析

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Jessika Witmer , Hannes Rosenbusch , Erdem O. Meral
{"title":"长相、身高、工作、履历、智力和同质性在网上约会中的相对重要性:一项联合分析","authors":"Jessika Witmer ,&nbsp;Hannes Rosenbusch ,&nbsp;Erdem O. Meral","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Researchers have forwarded many attributes that boost (or impede) dating success, but rarely quantify their relative importance in real dating scenarios. Here, we observed matching decisions of hetero- and bisexual online daters to isolate the simultaneous effects of targets' physical attractiveness, height, job, intelligence, biography, as well as selector X target homophily. A conjoint analysis of 5340 “swiping” decisions by 445 online daters demonstrated an overwhelming importance of physical attractiveness for dating success. A one SD improvement in physical attractiveness boosts one's selection success by around 20%, while the same increase in intelligence only improves one's chances by 2%. While this field study replicates and concretizes many laboratory findings, our conjoint attribute evaluation also showed that men and women had equal priorities and attribute effects, opposing some common hypotheses in the field. Further, the causal effects of intelligence, height, bio, occupation, and self-reported homophily were literature-consistent, but 7 to 20 times smaller than the effect of attractiveness. Implications for studying dating decisions, as well as practical considerations for designing dating profiles and apps, are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100579"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relative importance of looks, height, job, bio, intelligence, and homophily in online dating: A conjoint analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jessika Witmer ,&nbsp;Hannes Rosenbusch ,&nbsp;Erdem O. Meral\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Researchers have forwarded many attributes that boost (or impede) dating success, but rarely quantify their relative importance in real dating scenarios. Here, we observed matching decisions of hetero- and bisexual online daters to isolate the simultaneous effects of targets' physical attractiveness, height, job, intelligence, biography, as well as selector X target homophily. A conjoint analysis of 5340 “swiping” decisions by 445 online daters demonstrated an overwhelming importance of physical attractiveness for dating success. A one SD improvement in physical attractiveness boosts one's selection success by around 20%, while the same increase in intelligence only improves one's chances by 2%. While this field study replicates and concretizes many laboratory findings, our conjoint attribute evaluation also showed that men and women had equal priorities and attribute effects, opposing some common hypotheses in the field. Further, the causal effects of intelligence, height, bio, occupation, and self-reported homophily were literature-consistent, but 7 to 20 times smaller than the effect of attractiveness. Implications for studying dating decisions, as well as practical considerations for designing dating profiles and apps, are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824002124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824002124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员提出了许多促进(或阻碍)约会成功的特质,但很少量化它们在真实约会场景中的相对重要性。在这里,我们观察了异性恋和双性恋在线约会者的匹配决策,以分离目标的身体吸引力、身高、工作、智力、传记以及选择者X目标同质性的同时影响。一项对445名在线约会者5340次“滑动”决定的联合分析表明,外表吸引力对约会成功至关重要。外表魅力提高1个标准差,被选中的几率就会提高20%左右,而智力提高1个标准差,被选中的几率只会提高2%。虽然该实地研究重复并具体化了许多实验室研究结果,但我们的联合属性评估也表明,男性和女性具有同等的优先级和属性效应,这与该领域的一些常见假设相反。此外,智力、身高、生物、职业和自我报告的同质性的因果影响与文献一致,但比吸引力的影响小7到20倍。讨论了研究约会决策的意义,以及设计约会资料和应用程序的实际考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The relative importance of looks, height, job, bio, intelligence, and homophily in online dating: A conjoint analysis
Researchers have forwarded many attributes that boost (or impede) dating success, but rarely quantify their relative importance in real dating scenarios. Here, we observed matching decisions of hetero- and bisexual online daters to isolate the simultaneous effects of targets' physical attractiveness, height, job, intelligence, biography, as well as selector X target homophily. A conjoint analysis of 5340 “swiping” decisions by 445 online daters demonstrated an overwhelming importance of physical attractiveness for dating success. A one SD improvement in physical attractiveness boosts one's selection success by around 20%, while the same increase in intelligence only improves one's chances by 2%. While this field study replicates and concretizes many laboratory findings, our conjoint attribute evaluation also showed that men and women had equal priorities and attribute effects, opposing some common hypotheses in the field. Further, the causal effects of intelligence, height, bio, occupation, and self-reported homophily were literature-consistent, but 7 to 20 times smaller than the effect of attractiveness. Implications for studying dating decisions, as well as practical considerations for designing dating profiles and apps, are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信