对语言隐形的数字抵抗:抖音#亲粤语运动中抵抗的话语定位

IF 3.1 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Huimin Xu , Csilla Weninger
{"title":"对语言隐形的数字抵抗:抖音#亲粤语运动中抵抗的话语定位","authors":"Huimin Xu ,&nbsp;Csilla Weninger","doi":"10.1016/j.dcm.2025.100865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While there is a sizable body of scholarship on China’s social media and digital culture, including discourse-analytic studies, research into more contentious forms of discourse or how the internet and new technologies facilitate digital activism on the Chinese internet has remained sparse. This is especially true for newer types of platforms such as those built around short-form videos. This study takes the recent #Pro-Cantonese movement (PCM) on Douyin as a case study to investigate how users employ various technological and semiotic affordances to position themselves in response to the platform’s surveillance of Cantonese content. Using a critical multimodal approach, we analyzed 264 short videos under the hashtag #PCM posted between 1 September 2022 to 31 March 2023. Five distinct positions were identified within the PCM: radical activists, playful activists, positive energy patriots, rational experts, and cultural ambassadors. These results contribute to our understanding of the multi-faceted forms of everyday activism in China’s digital spheres and shed light on the sociocultural, technological, economic-political logics of platform culture in contemporary China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46649,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Context & Media","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 100865"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital resistance against linguistic invisibility: Discursive positionings of resistance in the #Pro-Cantonese movement on Douyin\",\"authors\":\"Huimin Xu ,&nbsp;Csilla Weninger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dcm.2025.100865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While there is a sizable body of scholarship on China’s social media and digital culture, including discourse-analytic studies, research into more contentious forms of discourse or how the internet and new technologies facilitate digital activism on the Chinese internet has remained sparse. This is especially true for newer types of platforms such as those built around short-form videos. This study takes the recent #Pro-Cantonese movement (PCM) on Douyin as a case study to investigate how users employ various technological and semiotic affordances to position themselves in response to the platform’s surveillance of Cantonese content. Using a critical multimodal approach, we analyzed 264 short videos under the hashtag #PCM posted between 1 September 2022 to 31 March 2023. Five distinct positions were identified within the PCM: radical activists, playful activists, positive energy patriots, rational experts, and cultural ambassadors. These results contribute to our understanding of the multi-faceted forms of everyday activism in China’s digital spheres and shed light on the sociocultural, technological, economic-political logics of platform culture in contemporary China.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discourse Context & Media\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100865\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discourse Context & Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211695825000145\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Context & Media","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211695825000145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然有大量关于中国社交媒体和数字文化的学术研究,包括话语分析研究,但对更具争议性的话语形式或互联网和新技术如何促进中国互联网上的数字激进主义的研究仍然很少。对于那些围绕短视频构建的新类型平台来说尤其如此。本研究以最近抖音上的#亲粤语运动(PCM)为例,研究用户如何利用各种技术和符号学支持来定位自己,以回应平台对粤语内容的监控。使用关键的多模式方法,我们分析了2022年9月1日至2023年3月31日期间发布的#PCM标签下的264个短视频。PCM内部确定了五种不同的立场:激进的积极分子,好玩的积极分子,正能量爱国者,理性专家和文化大使。这些结果有助于我们理解中国数字领域中日常行动主义的多方面形式,并揭示当代中国平台文化的社会文化、技术、经济政治逻辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital resistance against linguistic invisibility: Discursive positionings of resistance in the #Pro-Cantonese movement on Douyin
While there is a sizable body of scholarship on China’s social media and digital culture, including discourse-analytic studies, research into more contentious forms of discourse or how the internet and new technologies facilitate digital activism on the Chinese internet has remained sparse. This is especially true for newer types of platforms such as those built around short-form videos. This study takes the recent #Pro-Cantonese movement (PCM) on Douyin as a case study to investigate how users employ various technological and semiotic affordances to position themselves in response to the platform’s surveillance of Cantonese content. Using a critical multimodal approach, we analyzed 264 short videos under the hashtag #PCM posted between 1 September 2022 to 31 March 2023. Five distinct positions were identified within the PCM: radical activists, playful activists, positive energy patriots, rational experts, and cultural ambassadors. These results contribute to our understanding of the multi-faceted forms of everyday activism in China’s digital spheres and shed light on the sociocultural, technological, economic-political logics of platform culture in contemporary China.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Discourse Context & Media
Discourse Context & Media COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信