心肌梗死后室间隔破裂的再修复

IF 1.7 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
David Moros MD, Jean-Luc A. Maigrot BS, Nicholas G. Smedira MD, MBA, Michael Z.Y. Tong MD, MBA, Faisal G. Bakaeen MD, Edward G. Soltesz MD, MPH, Eric E. Roselli MD, Eugene H. Blackstone MD, A. Marc Gillinov MD, Lars G. Svensson MD, PhD, Aaron J. Weiss MD, PhD
{"title":"心肌梗死后室间隔破裂的再修复","authors":"David Moros MD,&nbsp;Jean-Luc A. Maigrot BS,&nbsp;Nicholas G. Smedira MD, MBA,&nbsp;Michael Z.Y. Tong MD, MBA,&nbsp;Faisal G. Bakaeen MD,&nbsp;Edward G. Soltesz MD, MPH,&nbsp;Eric E. Roselli MD,&nbsp;Eugene H. Blackstone MD,&nbsp;A. Marc Gillinov MD,&nbsp;Lars G. Svensson MD, PhD,&nbsp;Aaron J. Weiss MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.10.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Survivors of post–myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular septal rupture (VSR) repair may require reintervention if initial repairs are incomplete or fail. We assessed patients undergoing post-MI VSR re-repair.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between January 1976 and July 2023, 38 consecutive patients underwent re-repair of post-MI VSR at Cleveland Clinic. Preoperative characteristics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were obtained through medical records review, and patients were followed for survival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-two (84%) re-repairs were elective/urgent, and 6 (16%) were emergencies. Preoperative temporary mechanical circulatory support was used in 14 (37%), with 12 isolated intra-aortic balloon pumps. Indications for re-repair were recurrent VSR detected during postoperative surveillance (n = 25; 66%) and residual VSR after incomplete initial repair (n = 13; 34%). The median time from initial repair to re-repair was 55 days (15th/85th percentiles: 5-331 days). Two patients (5.3%) had residual or recurrent VSR after re-repair but received no intervention due to hemodynamic insignificance. Postoperative complications included sepsis (n = 7; 18%), stroke (n = 6; 16%), and new-onset dialysis (n = 6; 16%). Operative mortality was 32% (n = 12), with differences between patients who underwent surgery before January 2001 (n = 10/18; 56%) and those who did so after January 2001 (n = 2/20; 10%), as well as between patients who received preoperative temporary mechanical circulatory support (n = 8/14; 57%) and those who did not (n = 4/24; 17%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with failed or incomplete initial post-MI VSR repairs may be considered for re-repair, as modern-day improvements in perioperative care may be associated with more favorable outcomes. Referral to an expert tertiary center should be considered owing to the surgical complexity of re-repair.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53413,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS Techniques","volume":"29 ","pages":"Pages 43-55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-repair of post–myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture\",\"authors\":\"David Moros MD,&nbsp;Jean-Luc A. Maigrot BS,&nbsp;Nicholas G. Smedira MD, MBA,&nbsp;Michael Z.Y. Tong MD, MBA,&nbsp;Faisal G. Bakaeen MD,&nbsp;Edward G. Soltesz MD, MPH,&nbsp;Eric E. Roselli MD,&nbsp;Eugene H. Blackstone MD,&nbsp;A. Marc Gillinov MD,&nbsp;Lars G. Svensson MD, PhD,&nbsp;Aaron J. Weiss MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.10.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Survivors of post–myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular septal rupture (VSR) repair may require reintervention if initial repairs are incomplete or fail. We assessed patients undergoing post-MI VSR re-repair.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between January 1976 and July 2023, 38 consecutive patients underwent re-repair of post-MI VSR at Cleveland Clinic. Preoperative characteristics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were obtained through medical records review, and patients were followed for survival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-two (84%) re-repairs were elective/urgent, and 6 (16%) were emergencies. Preoperative temporary mechanical circulatory support was used in 14 (37%), with 12 isolated intra-aortic balloon pumps. Indications for re-repair were recurrent VSR detected during postoperative surveillance (n = 25; 66%) and residual VSR after incomplete initial repair (n = 13; 34%). The median time from initial repair to re-repair was 55 days (15th/85th percentiles: 5-331 days). Two patients (5.3%) had residual or recurrent VSR after re-repair but received no intervention due to hemodynamic insignificance. Postoperative complications included sepsis (n = 7; 18%), stroke (n = 6; 16%), and new-onset dialysis (n = 6; 16%). Operative mortality was 32% (n = 12), with differences between patients who underwent surgery before January 2001 (n = 10/18; 56%) and those who did so after January 2001 (n = 2/20; 10%), as well as between patients who received preoperative temporary mechanical circulatory support (n = 8/14; 57%) and those who did not (n = 4/24; 17%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with failed or incomplete initial post-MI VSR repairs may be considered for re-repair, as modern-day improvements in perioperative care may be associated with more favorable outcomes. Referral to an expert tertiary center should be considered owing to the surgical complexity of re-repair.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTCVS Techniques\",\"volume\":\"29 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 43-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTCVS Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666250724004474\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666250724004474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景心肌梗死(MI)后室间隔破裂(VSR)修复的幸存者如果初始修复不完整或失败,可能需要再次干预。我们评估了接受心肌梗死后VSR再修复的患者。方法1976年1月至2023年7月,38例连续患者在克利夫兰诊所接受心肌梗死后VSR再修复。通过病历回顾获得术前特征、手术细节和术后结果,并随访患者的生存情况。结果选择性/紧急修复32例(84%),紧急修复6例(16%)。术前使用临时机械循环支持14例(37%),12个孤立的主动脉内球囊泵。术后监测发现复发性VSR (n = 25;66%)和初始修复不完全后残留VSR (n = 13;34%)。从初次修复到再修复的中位时间为55天(第15 /85百分位数:5-331天)。2例(5.3%)患者在修复后有残留或复发的VSR,但由于血流动力学不显著而未接受干预。术后并发症包括脓毒症(n = 7;18%),中风(n = 6;16%)和新发透析(n = 6;16%)。手术死亡率为32% (n = 12),与2001年1月前接受手术的患者(n = 10/18;56%)和2001年1月以后的人(n = 2/20;10%),以及术前接受临时机械循环支持的患者之间(n = 8/14;57%)和没有(n = 4/24;17%)。结论心肌梗死后VSR初次修复失败或不完全的患者可以考虑进行再修复,因为现代围手术期护理的改善可能与更有利的结果相关。由于手术修复的复杂性,应考虑转诊到专家三级中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Re-repair of post–myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture

Re-repair of post–myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture

Background

Survivors of post–myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular septal rupture (VSR) repair may require reintervention if initial repairs are incomplete or fail. We assessed patients undergoing post-MI VSR re-repair.

Methods

Between January 1976 and July 2023, 38 consecutive patients underwent re-repair of post-MI VSR at Cleveland Clinic. Preoperative characteristics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were obtained through medical records review, and patients were followed for survival.

Results

Thirty-two (84%) re-repairs were elective/urgent, and 6 (16%) were emergencies. Preoperative temporary mechanical circulatory support was used in 14 (37%), with 12 isolated intra-aortic balloon pumps. Indications for re-repair were recurrent VSR detected during postoperative surveillance (n = 25; 66%) and residual VSR after incomplete initial repair (n = 13; 34%). The median time from initial repair to re-repair was 55 days (15th/85th percentiles: 5-331 days). Two patients (5.3%) had residual or recurrent VSR after re-repair but received no intervention due to hemodynamic insignificance. Postoperative complications included sepsis (n = 7; 18%), stroke (n = 6; 16%), and new-onset dialysis (n = 6; 16%). Operative mortality was 32% (n = 12), with differences between patients who underwent surgery before January 2001 (n = 10/18; 56%) and those who did so after January 2001 (n = 2/20; 10%), as well as between patients who received preoperative temporary mechanical circulatory support (n = 8/14; 57%) and those who did not (n = 4/24; 17%).

Conclusions

Patients with failed or incomplete initial post-MI VSR repairs may be considered for re-repair, as modern-day improvements in perioperative care may be associated with more favorable outcomes. Referral to an expert tertiary center should be considered owing to the surgical complexity of re-repair.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JTCVS Techniques
JTCVS Techniques Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
311
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信