可切除口腔癌的新辅助细胞因子(IRX-2)免疫治疗:INSPIRE试验的最终结果

Gregory T. Wolf , Emily Bellile , Celine Mauquoi , Ariane Nguyen , Maureen Sartor , Siyu Liu , Laura Rozek , Jonathan B. McHugh
{"title":"可切除口腔癌的新辅助细胞因子(IRX-2)免疫治疗:INSPIRE试验的最终结果","authors":"Gregory T. Wolf ,&nbsp;Emily Bellile ,&nbsp;Celine Mauquoi ,&nbsp;Ariane Nguyen ,&nbsp;Maureen Sartor ,&nbsp;Siyu Liu ,&nbsp;Laura Rozek ,&nbsp;Jonathan B. McHugh","doi":"10.1016/j.oor.2024.100706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oral cavity squamous carcinoma is characterized by alterations in cell mediated tumor immunity including a lack of immune reactive tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). To determine if a novel neoadjuvant injection of a multi-cytokine biologic (IRX-2) can restore immune reactivity and enhance patient survival, a randomized Phase 2 clinical trial was conducted in patients with Stage II-IV OSCC undergoing surgical resection (NCT 02609386).</div><div>The intention-to-treat (ITT) enrollment included 105 previously untreated patients, however 9 were excluded from the secondary endpoint analysis group for wrong histology, no treatment or patient refusal. A total of 96 patients comprised the final analytic group and were randomized (2:1) to receive the IRX-2 regimen (Regimen 1) compared to the identical regimen without IRX-2 cytokines (Regimen 2). Toxicity, tumor and immune responses, event-free (EFS) and overall (OS) survival were determined. Kaplan-Meier estimates for OS and EFS and inferential comparisons and asymptotoic log-rank testing between the two treatments were determined.</div><div>In prior preliminary analysis, significant increases in TILs and DMBT1 gene expression were noted for the IRX arm. No significant correlations of immunologic or tumor responses with survival outcomes were found. For the ITT population (n = 105) there were no significant differences in OS by treatment arm. OS [95 % CI] at 48 mo. was 70.4 [57.6, 80.0] vs 66.3 [47.5, 79.8] mos. (Regimen 1 vs Regimen 2, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Significant differences in survival were not seen, however, the trial demonstrated the feasibility of the neoadjuvant immunotherapy and differing immune modulation in each treatment arm. No correlations of immune biomarkers or tumor size changes with survival outcomes were identified.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94378,"journal":{"name":"Oral Oncology Reports","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100706"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neoadjuvant cytokine (IRX-2) immunotherapy for resectable oral cavity carcinoma: Final results of the INSPIRE trial\",\"authors\":\"Gregory T. Wolf ,&nbsp;Emily Bellile ,&nbsp;Celine Mauquoi ,&nbsp;Ariane Nguyen ,&nbsp;Maureen Sartor ,&nbsp;Siyu Liu ,&nbsp;Laura Rozek ,&nbsp;Jonathan B. McHugh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oor.2024.100706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Oral cavity squamous carcinoma is characterized by alterations in cell mediated tumor immunity including a lack of immune reactive tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). To determine if a novel neoadjuvant injection of a multi-cytokine biologic (IRX-2) can restore immune reactivity and enhance patient survival, a randomized Phase 2 clinical trial was conducted in patients with Stage II-IV OSCC undergoing surgical resection (NCT 02609386).</div><div>The intention-to-treat (ITT) enrollment included 105 previously untreated patients, however 9 were excluded from the secondary endpoint analysis group for wrong histology, no treatment or patient refusal. A total of 96 patients comprised the final analytic group and were randomized (2:1) to receive the IRX-2 regimen (Regimen 1) compared to the identical regimen without IRX-2 cytokines (Regimen 2). Toxicity, tumor and immune responses, event-free (EFS) and overall (OS) survival were determined. Kaplan-Meier estimates for OS and EFS and inferential comparisons and asymptotoic log-rank testing between the two treatments were determined.</div><div>In prior preliminary analysis, significant increases in TILs and DMBT1 gene expression were noted for the IRX arm. No significant correlations of immunologic or tumor responses with survival outcomes were found. For the ITT population (n = 105) there were no significant differences in OS by treatment arm. OS [95 % CI] at 48 mo. was 70.4 [57.6, 80.0] vs 66.3 [47.5, 79.8] mos. (Regimen 1 vs Regimen 2, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Significant differences in survival were not seen, however, the trial demonstrated the feasibility of the neoadjuvant immunotherapy and differing immune modulation in each treatment arm. No correlations of immune biomarkers or tumor size changes with survival outcomes were identified.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Oncology Reports\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100706\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Oncology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772906024005521\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772906024005521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

口腔鳞状癌的特点是细胞介导的肿瘤免疫改变,包括缺乏免疫反应性肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TILs)。为了确定一种新型新辅助注射多细胞因子生物制剂(IRX-2)是否能恢复免疫反应性并提高患者生存率,一项随机2期临床试验在手术切除的II-IV期OSCC患者中进行。意向治疗(ITT)入组包括105例先前未治疗的患者,但有9例因组织学错误、未治疗或患者拒绝而被排除在次要终点分析组之外。最终分析组共有96名患者,随机(2:1)接受IRX-2方案(方案1),与不使用IRX-2细胞因子的相同方案(方案2)相比。测定毒性、肿瘤和免疫反应、无事件(EFS)和总(OS)生存期。测定了OS和EFS的Kaplan-Meier估计值以及两种治疗之间的推理比较和渐近对数秩检验。在先前的初步分析中,IRX组的TILs和DMBT1基因表达显著增加。没有发现免疫或肿瘤反应与生存结果的显著相关性。对于ITT人群(n = 105),不同治疗组的OS无显著差异。48mo时的OS [95% CI]为70.4 [57.6,80.0]vs 66.3 [47.5, 79.8] mo。(分别为方案1和方案2)。结论:没有观察到生存率的显著差异,然而,该试验证明了新辅助免疫治疗和不同免疫调节在每个治疗组的可行性。未发现免疫生物标志物或肿瘤大小变化与生存结果的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neoadjuvant cytokine (IRX-2) immunotherapy for resectable oral cavity carcinoma: Final results of the INSPIRE trial
Oral cavity squamous carcinoma is characterized by alterations in cell mediated tumor immunity including a lack of immune reactive tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). To determine if a novel neoadjuvant injection of a multi-cytokine biologic (IRX-2) can restore immune reactivity and enhance patient survival, a randomized Phase 2 clinical trial was conducted in patients with Stage II-IV OSCC undergoing surgical resection (NCT 02609386).
The intention-to-treat (ITT) enrollment included 105 previously untreated patients, however 9 were excluded from the secondary endpoint analysis group for wrong histology, no treatment or patient refusal. A total of 96 patients comprised the final analytic group and were randomized (2:1) to receive the IRX-2 regimen (Regimen 1) compared to the identical regimen without IRX-2 cytokines (Regimen 2). Toxicity, tumor and immune responses, event-free (EFS) and overall (OS) survival were determined. Kaplan-Meier estimates for OS and EFS and inferential comparisons and asymptotoic log-rank testing between the two treatments were determined.
In prior preliminary analysis, significant increases in TILs and DMBT1 gene expression were noted for the IRX arm. No significant correlations of immunologic or tumor responses with survival outcomes were found. For the ITT population (n = 105) there were no significant differences in OS by treatment arm. OS [95 % CI] at 48 mo. was 70.4 [57.6, 80.0] vs 66.3 [47.5, 79.8] mos. (Regimen 1 vs Regimen 2, respectively).

Conclusions

Significant differences in survival were not seen, however, the trial demonstrated the feasibility of the neoadjuvant immunotherapy and differing immune modulation in each treatment arm. No correlations of immune biomarkers or tumor size changes with survival outcomes were identified.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信