{"title":"颗粒尿素和纳米尿素对小麦-水稻生产效率和氮素利用效率的相对影响","authors":"Kadapa Sreenivasa Reddy , Yashbir Singh Shivay , Dinesh Kumar , Vijay Pooniya , Radha Prasanna , Sunil Mandi , Somanath Nayak , Kirttiranjan Baral , Gunturi Alekhya , Rohit Bapurao Borate","doi":"10.1016/j.plana.2024.100131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increasing reliance on nitrogen (N) fertilizers in modern wheat and rice varieties has raised concerns about grain quality and environmental sustainability. Nano-fertilizers, particularly nano-urea, have been suggested as alternative use to conventional urea. A two-year field study (2021–22 and 2022–23) was conducted at the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, to assess the efficacy of granulated urea with and without nano-urea were tested with five nitrogen treatments (0 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup>, 130 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup>, 97.5 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> + nano urea foliar spray, 65 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> + nano urea spray, and 65 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> + 2 % granulated urea spray). Results indicated that 130 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> increased wheat and rice grain yields by 28.7 % and 29.4 %, respectively, and N uptake by 62 % in wheat and 52.4 % in rice compared to the control. However, the application of 65 kg ha<sup>–1</sup> + nano urea foliar sprays at the rate of 2.5 l ha<sup>–1</sup> recorded reduced grain yields, by 10.7 %, 9.4 % in wheat and rice, and N uptake decreased by 20.7 and 14.4 % in wheat and rice, respectively, in comparison to 130 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup>. Additional net returns of 16.5 % and 16.1 %, along with a higher B: C, were observed with N applied at 130 kg ha<sup>–1</sup> as compared to the 65 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> + nano urea. The study concludes that applying 130 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> of granulated urea is more effective for improving grain yield, N uptake, and profitability in the wheat-rice system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101029,"journal":{"name":"Plant Nano Biology","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative performance of granulated and nano urea on productivity and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat–rice sequence\",\"authors\":\"Kadapa Sreenivasa Reddy , Yashbir Singh Shivay , Dinesh Kumar , Vijay Pooniya , Radha Prasanna , Sunil Mandi , Somanath Nayak , Kirttiranjan Baral , Gunturi Alekhya , Rohit Bapurao Borate\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.plana.2024.100131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The increasing reliance on nitrogen (N) fertilizers in modern wheat and rice varieties has raised concerns about grain quality and environmental sustainability. Nano-fertilizers, particularly nano-urea, have been suggested as alternative use to conventional urea. A two-year field study (2021–22 and 2022–23) was conducted at the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, to assess the efficacy of granulated urea with and without nano-urea were tested with five nitrogen treatments (0 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup>, 130 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup>, 97.5 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> + nano urea foliar spray, 65 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> + nano urea spray, and 65 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> + 2 % granulated urea spray). Results indicated that 130 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> increased wheat and rice grain yields by 28.7 % and 29.4 %, respectively, and N uptake by 62 % in wheat and 52.4 % in rice compared to the control. However, the application of 65 kg ha<sup>–1</sup> + nano urea foliar sprays at the rate of 2.5 l ha<sup>–1</sup> recorded reduced grain yields, by 10.7 %, 9.4 % in wheat and rice, and N uptake decreased by 20.7 and 14.4 % in wheat and rice, respectively, in comparison to 130 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup>. Additional net returns of 16.5 % and 16.1 %, along with a higher B: C, were observed with N applied at 130 kg ha<sup>–1</sup> as compared to the 65 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> + nano urea. The study concludes that applying 130 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> of granulated urea is more effective for improving grain yield, N uptake, and profitability in the wheat-rice system.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Nano Biology\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Nano Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773111124000743\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Nano Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773111124000743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
现代小麦和水稻品种对氮肥的依赖日益增加,引起了人们对粮食质量和环境可持续性的担忧。纳米肥料,特别是纳米尿素,已被建议作为常规尿素的替代用途。两年的野外研究(2021 - 22和2022 - 23)进行ICAR-Indian农业研究所,新德里,评估粒状尿素的功效有或没有nano-urea五氮进行了治疗(0 公斤 N农业,130 公斤 N农业, 公斤97.5 N农业+纳米尿素叶面喷雾,65 公斤 N农业+纳米尿素喷雾,和65年 公斤 N是+ 2 %粒状尿素喷)。结果表明,与对照相比,130 kg N ha-1处理使小麦和水稻籽粒产量分别提高28.7 %和29.4 %,小麦和水稻氮素吸收量分别提高62 %和52.4 %。然而,应用65 公斤 农业+ nano尿素叶面喷雾的速度2.5 l 是降低粮食产量记录,由10.7 % 9.4 %在小麦和大米,和N吸收下降了20.7和14.4在小麦和大米 %,分别与130 公斤 N农业。与施氮量为65 kg N ha-1 + 的纳米尿素相比,施氮量为130 kg ha-1的净报酬率为16.5 %和16.1 %,B: C值更高。综上所述,施用130 kg N ha-1颗粒化尿素对提高小麦-水稻籽粒产量、氮素吸收和经济效益更为有效。
Relative performance of granulated and nano urea on productivity and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat–rice sequence
The increasing reliance on nitrogen (N) fertilizers in modern wheat and rice varieties has raised concerns about grain quality and environmental sustainability. Nano-fertilizers, particularly nano-urea, have been suggested as alternative use to conventional urea. A two-year field study (2021–22 and 2022–23) was conducted at the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, to assess the efficacy of granulated urea with and without nano-urea were tested with five nitrogen treatments (0 kg N ha–1, 130 kg N ha–1, 97.5 kg N ha–1 + nano urea foliar spray, 65 kg N ha–1 + nano urea spray, and 65 kg N ha–1 + 2 % granulated urea spray). Results indicated that 130 kg N ha–1 increased wheat and rice grain yields by 28.7 % and 29.4 %, respectively, and N uptake by 62 % in wheat and 52.4 % in rice compared to the control. However, the application of 65 kg ha–1 + nano urea foliar sprays at the rate of 2.5 l ha–1 recorded reduced grain yields, by 10.7 %, 9.4 % in wheat and rice, and N uptake decreased by 20.7 and 14.4 % in wheat and rice, respectively, in comparison to 130 kg N ha–1. Additional net returns of 16.5 % and 16.1 %, along with a higher B: C, were observed with N applied at 130 kg ha–1 as compared to the 65 kg N ha–1 + nano urea. The study concludes that applying 130 kg N ha–1 of granulated urea is more effective for improving grain yield, N uptake, and profitability in the wheat-rice system.