利用“RGB_ex-ante”模型对微尺度热泳术与质谱联用进行前瞻性评价

Paweł Mateusz Nowak, Aleksandra Zima, Małgorzata Gołąb, Michał Woźniakiewicz
{"title":"利用“RGB_ex-ante”模型对微尺度热泳术与质谱联用进行前瞻性评价","authors":"Paweł Mateusz Nowak,&nbsp;Aleksandra Zima,&nbsp;Małgorzata Gołąb,&nbsp;Michał Woźniakiewicz","doi":"10.1016/j.greeac.2024.100185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The evaluation of greenness and whiteness is usually made retrospectively (ex-post) – for a developed and validated methodology ready for use. However, it can also be made ex-ante, i.e. taking into account the potential pros and cons that have not yet been experimentally confirmed. The RGB_ex-ante model presented here is a simple assessment framework to help determine whether developing a new specific methodology is worth investing effort. We used it for a prospective evaluation of a new foreseen technique – microscale thermophoresis (MST) coupled online with mass spectrometry (MST-MS). Concurrently, it was demonstrated that biophysical techniques dedicated to the analysis of biomolecular interactions, such as MST, can and should be assessed in terms of greenness and whiteness on an equal footing with chromatography, spectroscopy and other quantitative analysis techniques. We report the original preliminary research results confirming the possibility of combining online MST and MS instruments, which, however, do not yet constitute evidence for analyzing equilibrium processes in this system. For that reason, an ex-ante evaluation was performed. The obtained greenness and whiteness scores suggest that the MST-MS technique would likely be greener than the conventional offline approach, but not whiter. Despite some potential benefits related to all attributes (red, green and blue criteria), the implementation of MST-MS coupling would entail a number of limitations that overall offset the expected merits. The proposed evaluation model turned out to be a simple and helpful tool that is worth using prior developing new methods, procedures and experimental techniques in analytical laboratory and beyond.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100594,"journal":{"name":"Green Analytical Chemistry","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prospective evaluation of microscale thermophoresis coupled with mass spectrometry using the “RGB_ex-ante” model\",\"authors\":\"Paweł Mateusz Nowak,&nbsp;Aleksandra Zima,&nbsp;Małgorzata Gołąb,&nbsp;Michał Woźniakiewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.greeac.2024.100185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The evaluation of greenness and whiteness is usually made retrospectively (ex-post) – for a developed and validated methodology ready for use. However, it can also be made ex-ante, i.e. taking into account the potential pros and cons that have not yet been experimentally confirmed. The RGB_ex-ante model presented here is a simple assessment framework to help determine whether developing a new specific methodology is worth investing effort. We used it for a prospective evaluation of a new foreseen technique – microscale thermophoresis (MST) coupled online with mass spectrometry (MST-MS). Concurrently, it was demonstrated that biophysical techniques dedicated to the analysis of biomolecular interactions, such as MST, can and should be assessed in terms of greenness and whiteness on an equal footing with chromatography, spectroscopy and other quantitative analysis techniques. We report the original preliminary research results confirming the possibility of combining online MST and MS instruments, which, however, do not yet constitute evidence for analyzing equilibrium processes in this system. For that reason, an ex-ante evaluation was performed. The obtained greenness and whiteness scores suggest that the MST-MS technique would likely be greener than the conventional offline approach, but not whiter. Despite some potential benefits related to all attributes (red, green and blue criteria), the implementation of MST-MS coupling would entail a number of limitations that overall offset the expected merits. The proposed evaluation model turned out to be a simple and helpful tool that is worth using prior developing new methods, procedures and experimental techniques in analytical laboratory and beyond.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Green Analytical Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Green Analytical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577424000946\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577424000946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

绿度和白度的评价通常是回顾性的(事后)-为开发和验证的方法准备使用。然而,它也可以是事前的,即考虑到尚未被实验证实的潜在利弊。这里提出的rgb_事前模型是一个简单的评估框架,可以帮助确定开发一种新的特定方法是否值得投入精力。我们用它对一种新的可预见的技术——微尺度热泳术(MST)在线耦合质谱法(MST- ms)进行了前瞻性评价。同时,研究表明,用于分析生物分子相互作用的生物物理技术,如MST,可以而且应该与色谱、光谱学和其他定量分析技术一样,在绿度和白度方面进行评估。我们报告了最初的初步研究结果,证实了在线MST和MS仪器相结合的可能性,然而,这还不能构成分析该系统平衡过程的证据。因此,进行了事前评价。获得的绿度和白度分数表明,MST-MS技术可能比传统的离线方法更环保,但不是更白。尽管与所有属性(红色、绿色和蓝色标准)相关的一些潜在好处,但MST-MS耦合的实现将带来许多限制,这些限制总体上抵消了预期的优点。所提出的评价模型是一种简单实用的工具,值得在分析实验室及其他领域开发新的方法、程序和实验技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A prospective evaluation of microscale thermophoresis coupled with mass spectrometry using the “RGB_ex-ante” model

A prospective evaluation of microscale thermophoresis coupled with mass spectrometry using the “RGB_ex-ante” model
The evaluation of greenness and whiteness is usually made retrospectively (ex-post) – for a developed and validated methodology ready for use. However, it can also be made ex-ante, i.e. taking into account the potential pros and cons that have not yet been experimentally confirmed. The RGB_ex-ante model presented here is a simple assessment framework to help determine whether developing a new specific methodology is worth investing effort. We used it for a prospective evaluation of a new foreseen technique – microscale thermophoresis (MST) coupled online with mass spectrometry (MST-MS). Concurrently, it was demonstrated that biophysical techniques dedicated to the analysis of biomolecular interactions, such as MST, can and should be assessed in terms of greenness and whiteness on an equal footing with chromatography, spectroscopy and other quantitative analysis techniques. We report the original preliminary research results confirming the possibility of combining online MST and MS instruments, which, however, do not yet constitute evidence for analyzing equilibrium processes in this system. For that reason, an ex-ante evaluation was performed. The obtained greenness and whiteness scores suggest that the MST-MS technique would likely be greener than the conventional offline approach, but not whiter. Despite some potential benefits related to all attributes (red, green and blue criteria), the implementation of MST-MS coupling would entail a number of limitations that overall offset the expected merits. The proposed evaluation model turned out to be a simple and helpful tool that is worth using prior developing new methods, procedures and experimental techniques in analytical laboratory and beyond.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信