大麻合法化的未来及其对合成大麻素供应的影响

A. El Mougy
{"title":"大麻合法化的未来及其对合成大麻素供应的影响","authors":"A. El Mougy","doi":"10.1016/j.etdah.2023.100090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, there has been a strong pressure on legislatures to legalize or decriminalize use and possession of specified amounts of cannabis in many Countries. Opinions about drug legalization/decriminalization can differ based on whether a person has a personal history of substance use and as a function of demographic and ideological characteristics (such a religious or political preference). Legalization of drugs (e.g., cannabinoids) is the process of removing all legal prohibitions against it. Decriminalization of drugs (e.g., cannabinoids) means it would remain illegal, but the legal system would not prosecute a person for possession under a specified amount. Instead, the penalties would range from no penalties at all, civil fines, drug education, or drug treatment. Proponents of drug legalization argue that prohibition in general and the “War on Drugs” that began in the 1980′s, in particular, have created a black market for drugs, overloaded the criminal justice system, and failed to reduce the supply of drugs. On the other hand, the negative data of cannabinoids use far outweigh a few documented benefits for a limited set of medical indications, for which safe and effective alternative treatments are readily available. If there is any medical role for cannabinoid drugs, it lies with chemically defined compounds, not with unprocessed cannabis plant. On the other hand, the easy availability, cheapness, perceptive legality, and difficulty in detecting its presence with standard urine toxicologic tests, and similar factors probably contribute to the increased use, and popularity of synthetic cannabinoids. Although laws, and regulations concerning auditing of these substances have been implemented in many countries, production of new types of synthetic cannabinoids rapidly takes place.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72899,"journal":{"name":"Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100090"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Future of Legalization of Cannabis and its Impact on the Availability of Synthetic Cannabinoids\",\"authors\":\"A. El Mougy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.etdah.2023.100090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In recent years, there has been a strong pressure on legislatures to legalize or decriminalize use and possession of specified amounts of cannabis in many Countries. Opinions about drug legalization/decriminalization can differ based on whether a person has a personal history of substance use and as a function of demographic and ideological characteristics (such a religious or political preference). Legalization of drugs (e.g., cannabinoids) is the process of removing all legal prohibitions against it. Decriminalization of drugs (e.g., cannabinoids) means it would remain illegal, but the legal system would not prosecute a person for possession under a specified amount. Instead, the penalties would range from no penalties at all, civil fines, drug education, or drug treatment. Proponents of drug legalization argue that prohibition in general and the “War on Drugs” that began in the 1980′s, in particular, have created a black market for drugs, overloaded the criminal justice system, and failed to reduce the supply of drugs. On the other hand, the negative data of cannabinoids use far outweigh a few documented benefits for a limited set of medical indications, for which safe and effective alternative treatments are readily available. If there is any medical role for cannabinoid drugs, it lies with chemically defined compounds, not with unprocessed cannabis plant. On the other hand, the easy availability, cheapness, perceptive legality, and difficulty in detecting its presence with standard urine toxicologic tests, and similar factors probably contribute to the increased use, and popularity of synthetic cannabinoids. Although laws, and regulations concerning auditing of these substances have been implemented in many countries, production of new types of synthetic cannabinoids rapidly takes place.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100090\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667118223000417\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667118223000417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,在许多国家,立法机构面临着巨大的压力,要求将使用和拥有特定数量的大麻合法化或非刑事化。关于药物合法化/非刑事化的意见可能因个人是否有药物使用史以及人口统计学和意识形态特征(如宗教或政治偏好)而有所不同。毒品(如大麻素)的合法化是消除所有法律禁令的过程。毒品(如大麻素)的非刑事化意味着它仍然是非法的,但法律系统不会起诉拥有特定数量的人。相反,处罚的范围从根本不处罚、民事罚款、毒品教育或毒品治疗不等。毒品合法化的支持者认为,总体上的禁令,特别是始于20世纪80年代的“毒品战争”,已经创造了一个毒品黑市,使刑事司法系统不堪重负,却未能减少毒品的供应。另一方面,大麻素使用的负面数据远远超过了对有限医学适应症的一些有记录的好处,对于这些适应症,安全有效的替代疗法是现成的。如果大麻素类药物有任何医疗作用,那就是化学定义的化合物,而不是未经加工的大麻植物。另一方面,容易获得、便宜、明显合法以及难以通过标准尿液毒理学测试检测其存在,以及类似的因素可能导致合成大麻素的使用增加和普及。尽管许多国家已经实施了有关审计这些物质的法律和法规,但新型合成大麻素的生产正在迅速进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Future of Legalization of Cannabis and its Impact on the Availability of Synthetic Cannabinoids
In recent years, there has been a strong pressure on legislatures to legalize or decriminalize use and possession of specified amounts of cannabis in many Countries. Opinions about drug legalization/decriminalization can differ based on whether a person has a personal history of substance use and as a function of demographic and ideological characteristics (such a religious or political preference). Legalization of drugs (e.g., cannabinoids) is the process of removing all legal prohibitions against it. Decriminalization of drugs (e.g., cannabinoids) means it would remain illegal, but the legal system would not prosecute a person for possession under a specified amount. Instead, the penalties would range from no penalties at all, civil fines, drug education, or drug treatment. Proponents of drug legalization argue that prohibition in general and the “War on Drugs” that began in the 1980′s, in particular, have created a black market for drugs, overloaded the criminal justice system, and failed to reduce the supply of drugs. On the other hand, the negative data of cannabinoids use far outweigh a few documented benefits for a limited set of medical indications, for which safe and effective alternative treatments are readily available. If there is any medical role for cannabinoid drugs, it lies with chemically defined compounds, not with unprocessed cannabis plant. On the other hand, the easy availability, cheapness, perceptive legality, and difficulty in detecting its presence with standard urine toxicologic tests, and similar factors probably contribute to the increased use, and popularity of synthetic cannabinoids. Although laws, and regulations concerning auditing of these substances have been implemented in many countries, production of new types of synthetic cannabinoids rapidly takes place.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health
Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Forensic Medicine, Drug Discovery, Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (General)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信