一种新型超镜胃十二指肠全层切除装置治疗上消化道病变的临床安全性:多中心经验

iGIE Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.igie.2024.09.004
Alyssa Y. Choi MD , Peter H. Nguyen MD , Jaehyun Kim MD , Julie Yang MD , Sherif A. Andrawes MD , Jean Chalhoub MD , Anastasia Chahine MD , Andrew Q. Giap MD , David P. Lee MD , Kenneth H. Park MD , Quin Y. Liu MD , Srinivas Gaddam MD , Kendrick Che DO , Michael Lajin MD , Wasseem Skef MD , Amirali Tavangar MD , John J. Kim MD , Jason B. Samarasena MD, MBA
{"title":"一种新型超镜胃十二指肠全层切除装置治疗上消化道病变的临床安全性:多中心经验","authors":"Alyssa Y. Choi MD ,&nbsp;Peter H. Nguyen MD ,&nbsp;Jaehyun Kim MD ,&nbsp;Julie Yang MD ,&nbsp;Sherif A. Andrawes MD ,&nbsp;Jean Chalhoub MD ,&nbsp;Anastasia Chahine MD ,&nbsp;Andrew Q. Giap MD ,&nbsp;David P. Lee MD ,&nbsp;Kenneth H. Park MD ,&nbsp;Quin Y. Liu MD ,&nbsp;Srinivas Gaddam MD ,&nbsp;Kendrick Che DO ,&nbsp;Michael Lajin MD ,&nbsp;Wasseem Skef MD ,&nbsp;Amirali Tavangar MD ,&nbsp;John J. Kim MD ,&nbsp;Jason B. Samarasena MD, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.igie.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>A novel gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device system was developed for resection of upper GI tract lesions. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Consecutive patients who received endoscopic resection of upper GI tract lesions from June 2020 to August 2022 using a gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device were evaluated from 8 U.S. centers. Primary endpoints were technical success and R0 resection. Secondary endpoints were en bloc resection, residual lesions at follow-up endoscopy, and immediate or delayed adverse events.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-four patients (mean age, 60.9 ± 15.8 years) received 45 resections for gastric (35, 80%) and duodenal (9, 20%) lesions. Thirty-four lesions (77%) were subepithelial and 10 (23%) were epithelial lesions. Technical success and en bloc resection were achieved in 43 (96%) and 41 (91%) patients, respectively. Furthermore, R0 resection was achieved in 32 patients (71%), including 24 of 35 (69%) with neoplastic lesions. Pathologic diagnosis included neuroendocrine tumor in 14 patients (32%), GI stromal tumor in 10 (23%), and gastric cancer or high-grade dysplasia in 7 (16%). Minor immediate and delayed bleeding occurred in 17 (38%) and 2 (4%) patients, respectively. One patient had delayed perforation, managed conservatively. On follow-up, 19 of 21 patients (90%) had no residual lesion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this multicenter series, the gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device demonstrated high rates of technical success and acceptable rate of R0 resection. Immediate minor bleeding was common, whereas serious adverse events were rare. This gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device should be considered in patients with gastroduodenal subepithelial lesions as an alternative to long-term surveillance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100652,"journal":{"name":"iGIE","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 490-500"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical safety of a novel over-the-scope gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device for the treatment of upper GI tract lesions: a multicenter experience\",\"authors\":\"Alyssa Y. Choi MD ,&nbsp;Peter H. Nguyen MD ,&nbsp;Jaehyun Kim MD ,&nbsp;Julie Yang MD ,&nbsp;Sherif A. Andrawes MD ,&nbsp;Jean Chalhoub MD ,&nbsp;Anastasia Chahine MD ,&nbsp;Andrew Q. Giap MD ,&nbsp;David P. Lee MD ,&nbsp;Kenneth H. Park MD ,&nbsp;Quin Y. Liu MD ,&nbsp;Srinivas Gaddam MD ,&nbsp;Kendrick Che DO ,&nbsp;Michael Lajin MD ,&nbsp;Wasseem Skef MD ,&nbsp;Amirali Tavangar MD ,&nbsp;John J. Kim MD ,&nbsp;Jason B. Samarasena MD, MBA\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.igie.2024.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>A novel gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device system was developed for resection of upper GI tract lesions. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Consecutive patients who received endoscopic resection of upper GI tract lesions from June 2020 to August 2022 using a gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device were evaluated from 8 U.S. centers. Primary endpoints were technical success and R0 resection. Secondary endpoints were en bloc resection, residual lesions at follow-up endoscopy, and immediate or delayed adverse events.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-four patients (mean age, 60.9 ± 15.8 years) received 45 resections for gastric (35, 80%) and duodenal (9, 20%) lesions. Thirty-four lesions (77%) were subepithelial and 10 (23%) were epithelial lesions. Technical success and en bloc resection were achieved in 43 (96%) and 41 (91%) patients, respectively. Furthermore, R0 resection was achieved in 32 patients (71%), including 24 of 35 (69%) with neoplastic lesions. Pathologic diagnosis included neuroendocrine tumor in 14 patients (32%), GI stromal tumor in 10 (23%), and gastric cancer or high-grade dysplasia in 7 (16%). Minor immediate and delayed bleeding occurred in 17 (38%) and 2 (4%) patients, respectively. One patient had delayed perforation, managed conservatively. On follow-up, 19 of 21 patients (90%) had no residual lesion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this multicenter series, the gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device demonstrated high rates of technical success and acceptable rate of R0 resection. Immediate minor bleeding was common, whereas serious adverse events were rare. This gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device should be considered in patients with gastroduodenal subepithelial lesions as an alternative to long-term surveillance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"iGIE\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 490-500\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"iGIE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708624001158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708624001158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:研制一种新型胃十二指肠全层切除装置系统,用于上消化道病变的切除。在本研究中,我们评估了胃十二指肠全层切除装置系统的有效性和安全性。方法对2020年6月至2022年8月连续接受胃十二指肠全层切除术的上消化道病变患者进行评估,这些患者来自美国8个中心。主要终点为技术成功和R0切除。次要终点是整体切除、随访内镜检查时的残留病变和立即或延迟的不良事件。结果44例患者(平均年龄60.9±15.8岁)共行45例胃(35.80%)、十二指肠(9.20%)病变切除术。34例(77%)上皮下病变,10例(23%)上皮病变。技术成功和整体切除分别有43例(96%)和41例(91%)患者。此外,32例患者(71%)实现了R0切除术,其中35例患者中有24例(69%)存在肿瘤病变。病理诊断为神经内分泌肿瘤14例(32%),胃肠道间质瘤10例(23%),胃癌或高度不典型增生7例(16%)。分别有17例(38%)和2例(4%)患者发生轻微的即时和延迟出血。1例迟发性穿孔,保守处理。在随访中,21例患者中有19例(90%)无残留病变。结论在本多中心系列试验中,胃十二指肠全层切除装置技术成功率高,R0切除率可接受。立即轻微出血是常见的,而严重的不良事件是罕见的。对于胃十二指肠上皮下病变患者,应考虑采用这种胃十二指肠全层切除装置作为长期监测的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical safety of a novel over-the-scope gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device for the treatment of upper GI tract lesions: a multicenter experience

Background and Aims

A novel gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device system was developed for resection of upper GI tract lesions. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device system.

Methods

Consecutive patients who received endoscopic resection of upper GI tract lesions from June 2020 to August 2022 using a gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device were evaluated from 8 U.S. centers. Primary endpoints were technical success and R0 resection. Secondary endpoints were en bloc resection, residual lesions at follow-up endoscopy, and immediate or delayed adverse events.

Results

Forty-four patients (mean age, 60.9 ± 15.8 years) received 45 resections for gastric (35, 80%) and duodenal (9, 20%) lesions. Thirty-four lesions (77%) were subepithelial and 10 (23%) were epithelial lesions. Technical success and en bloc resection were achieved in 43 (96%) and 41 (91%) patients, respectively. Furthermore, R0 resection was achieved in 32 patients (71%), including 24 of 35 (69%) with neoplastic lesions. Pathologic diagnosis included neuroendocrine tumor in 14 patients (32%), GI stromal tumor in 10 (23%), and gastric cancer or high-grade dysplasia in 7 (16%). Minor immediate and delayed bleeding occurred in 17 (38%) and 2 (4%) patients, respectively. One patient had delayed perforation, managed conservatively. On follow-up, 19 of 21 patients (90%) had no residual lesion.

Conclusions

In this multicenter series, the gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device demonstrated high rates of technical success and acceptable rate of R0 resection. Immediate minor bleeding was common, whereas serious adverse events were rare. This gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device should be considered in patients with gastroduodenal subepithelial lesions as an alternative to long-term surveillance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信