ao外伤ORP基础课程的小组讨论是否影响手术室人员的护理方法？

Q2 Nursing

Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.pcorm.2024.100448

Sara Cohen , Mor Saban , Rami Mosheiff , Yair Shapira , Yoram A. Weil

{"title":"ao外伤ORP基础课程的小组讨论是否影响手术室人员的护理方法？","authors":"Sara Cohen , Mor Saban , Rami Mosheiff , Yair Shapira , Yoram A. Weil","doi":"10.1016/j.pcorm.2024.100448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Effective communication and collaborative care models are essential for optimizing trauma patient outcomes. However, traditional learning methods can hinder the development of interprofessional care approaches in the operating room (OR).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluated an innovative nursing education program aimed at enhancing trauma care through interprofessional group discussions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective evaluation was conducted of 268 OR nurses who participated in the Advances in Trauma Care curriculum. The intervention group (<em>n</em> = 147) completed preparatory eLearning and attended group-based sessions as part of the basic trauma care course. The control group (<em>n</em> = 121) did not participate. Trauma care approaches were assessed before and after the program using a 5-item observational scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Pre-program baseline scores on the 5-item observational scale ranged from low to medium for both the control and intervention groups. However, post-program, the intervention group showed a significant improvement, with scores rising to the medium to high range. When comparing the two groups, the intervention group scored significantly higher than the control group (t(265)=6.14, <em>p</em> < 0.01). Additionally, scores within the intervention group increased significantly from pre- to post-program (t(146)=-24.93, <em>p</em> < 0.01). Scores improved notably in each participating country after the intervention. Paired <em>t</em>-tests further confirmed a significant difference in the intervention group's score before and after the educational program (t(33)= -11.20, <em>p</em> < 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Preliminary evidence suggests incorporating interprofessional group discussions within trauma education may positively impact nurses' application of trauma-informed care. This approach could enhance the quality of nursing care, promote evidence-based practice, and support continuous professional development—not only in operating rooms but across various departments. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness and sustainability of collaborative learning models for advancing multidisciplinary trauma care on a global scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53468,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100448"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do the group discussions of the AOTrauma ORP basic course influence operating-room personnel's care approaches?\",\"authors\":\"Sara Cohen , Mor Saban , Rami Mosheiff , Yair Shapira , Yoram A. Weil\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pcorm.2024.100448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Effective communication and collaborative care models are essential for optimizing trauma patient outcomes. However, traditional learning methods can hinder the development of interprofessional care approaches in the operating room (OR).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluated an innovative nursing education program aimed at enhancing trauma care through interprofessional group discussions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective evaluation was conducted of 268 OR nurses who participated in the Advances in Trauma Care curriculum. The intervention group (<em>n</em> = 147) completed preparatory eLearning and attended group-based sessions as part of the basic trauma care course. The control group (<em>n</em> = 121) did not participate. Trauma care approaches were assessed before and after the program using a 5-item observational scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Pre-program baseline scores on the 5-item observational scale ranged from low to medium for both the control and intervention groups. However, post-program, the intervention group showed a significant improvement, with scores rising to the medium to high range. When comparing the two groups, the intervention group scored significantly higher than the control group (t(265)=6.14, <em>p</em> < 0.01). Additionally, scores within the intervention group increased significantly from pre- to post-program (t(146)=-24.93, <em>p</em> < 0.01). Scores improved notably in each participating country after the intervention. Paired <em>t</em>-tests further confirmed a significant difference in the intervention group's score before and after the educational program (t(33)= -11.20, <em>p</em> < 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Preliminary evidence suggests incorporating interprofessional group discussions within trauma education may positively impact nurses' application of trauma-informed care. This approach could enhance the quality of nursing care, promote evidence-based practice, and support continuous professional development—not only in operating rooms but across various departments. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness and sustainability of collaborative learning models for advancing multidisciplinary trauma care on a global scale.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100448\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405603024000815\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405603024000815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

有效的沟通和协作护理模式对于优化创伤患者的预后至关重要。然而，传统的学习方法可能会阻碍手术室（OR）跨专业护理方法的发展。目的探讨一种创新的护理教育方案，旨在通过跨专业小组讨论加强创伤护理。方法对参加《创伤护理进展》课程的268名手术室护士进行前瞻性评价。干预组（n = 147）完成了预备的电子学习，并参加了以小组为基础的会议，作为基本创伤护理课程的一部分。对照组（n = 121）不参与。使用5项观察量表评估项目前后的创伤护理方法。结果对照组和干预组在5项观察量表上的项目前基线得分从低到中不等。然而，在项目结束后，干预组表现出显著的改善，得分上升到中高范围。两组比较，干预组得分显著高于对照组(t(265)=6.14, p <；0.01)。此外，干预组的得分从计划前到计划后显著增加(t(146)=-24.93, p <；0.01)。干预后，每个参与国的得分都显著提高。配对t检验进一步证实干预组在教育项目前后的得分有显著差异(t(33)= -11.20, p <；0.01)。结论初步证据表明，在创伤教育中加入跨专业小组讨论可以对护士创伤知情护理的应用产生积极影响。这种方法可以提高护理质量，促进循证实践，并支持持续的专业发展-不仅在手术室，而且在各个部门。需要进一步的研究来评估协作学习模式在全球范围内推进多学科创伤护理的有效性和可持续性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Do the group discussions of the AOTrauma ORP basic course influence operating-room personnel's care approaches?

Background

Effective communication and collaborative care models are essential for optimizing trauma patient outcomes. However, traditional learning methods can hinder the development of interprofessional care approaches in the operating room (OR).

Objective

This study evaluated an innovative nursing education program aimed at enhancing trauma care through interprofessional group discussions.

Methods

A prospective evaluation was conducted of 268 OR nurses who participated in the Advances in Trauma Care curriculum. The intervention group (n = 147) completed preparatory eLearning and attended group-based sessions as part of the basic trauma care course. The control group (n = 121) did not participate. Trauma care approaches were assessed before and after the program using a 5-item observational scale.

Results

Pre-program baseline scores on the 5-item observational scale ranged from low to medium for both the control and intervention groups. However, post-program, the intervention group showed a significant improvement, with scores rising to the medium to high range. When comparing the two groups, the intervention group scored significantly higher than the control group (t(265)=6.14, p < 0.01). Additionally, scores within the intervention group increased significantly from pre- to post-program (t(146)=-24.93, p < 0.01). Scores improved notably in each participating country after the intervention. Paired t-tests further confirmed a significant difference in the intervention group's score before and after the educational program (t(33)= -11.20, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Preliminary evidence suggests incorporating interprofessional group discussions within trauma education may positively impact nurses' application of trauma-informed care. This approach could enhance the quality of nursing care, promote evidence-based practice, and support continuous professional development—not only in operating rooms but across various departments. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness and sustainability of collaborative learning models for advancing multidisciplinary trauma care on a global scale.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

56 days

期刊介绍： The objective of this new online journal is to serve as a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed source of information related to the administrative, economic, operational, safety, and quality aspects of the ambulatory and in-patient operating room and interventional procedural processes. The journal will provide high-quality information and research findings on operational and system-based approaches to ensure safe, coordinated, and high-value periprocedural care. With the current focus on value in health care it is essential that there is a venue for researchers to publish articles on quality improvement process initiatives, process flow modeling, information management, efficient design, cost improvement, use of novel technologies, and management.