胸腹主动脉瘤混合修复术作为开放性修复术的救助选择

Camila Esquetini-Vernon, Houssam Farres, Mohamed Rajab, Christopher Jacobs, Young Erben
{"title":"胸腹主动脉瘤混合修复术作为开放性修复术的救助选择","authors":"Camila Esquetini-Vernon,&nbsp;Houssam Farres,&nbsp;Mohamed Rajab,&nbsp;Christopher Jacobs,&nbsp;Young Erben","doi":"10.1016/j.avsurg.2024.100353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair remains associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. An endovascular repair offers a less invasive alternative but is limited by the availability of devices and anatomical constraints. A hybrid approach, combining open visceral debranching with endovascular exclusion, is a viable option for high-risk patients unsuitable for complete open repair.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical summary</h3><div>We report a three-stage hybrid repair of a type IV TAAA in a 62-year-old male with a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, seizures, and severe aortic stenosis post-transcatheter aorta valve replacement (TAVR). This repair was initially planned for a single-stage operation. However, due to significant inflammatory findings at the time of the surgical intervention, a staged repair was performed. The inflammation caused significant difficulty in the aorta and vessel dissection and acute blood loss, making this staged approach the safest and most feasible option. On the initial operation, the patient underwent visceral debranching, followed by endovascular thoracic aortic stent placement and a final, physician-modified endograft addressing the right renal artery and exclusion of the aortic aneurysm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This case illustrates the successful use of a staged hybrid approach for TAAA repair when the initial operation cannot be completed as planned due to inflammatory features found at the time of aortic exposure. It demonstrates a pivot to the initial surgical plan yielding a favorable outcome with the preservation of renal function in a high-risk and complex patient.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72235,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery. Brief reports and innovations","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid Repair of a Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm as a Bailout Option from Open Repair\",\"authors\":\"Camila Esquetini-Vernon,&nbsp;Houssam Farres,&nbsp;Mohamed Rajab,&nbsp;Christopher Jacobs,&nbsp;Young Erben\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsurg.2024.100353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair remains associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. An endovascular repair offers a less invasive alternative but is limited by the availability of devices and anatomical constraints. A hybrid approach, combining open visceral debranching with endovascular exclusion, is a viable option for high-risk patients unsuitable for complete open repair.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical summary</h3><div>We report a three-stage hybrid repair of a type IV TAAA in a 62-year-old male with a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, seizures, and severe aortic stenosis post-transcatheter aorta valve replacement (TAVR). This repair was initially planned for a single-stage operation. However, due to significant inflammatory findings at the time of the surgical intervention, a staged repair was performed. The inflammation caused significant difficulty in the aorta and vessel dissection and acute blood loss, making this staged approach the safest and most feasible option. On the initial operation, the patient underwent visceral debranching, followed by endovascular thoracic aortic stent placement and a final, physician-modified endograft addressing the right renal artery and exclusion of the aortic aneurysm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This case illustrates the successful use of a staged hybrid approach for TAAA repair when the initial operation cannot be completed as planned due to inflammatory features found at the time of aortic exposure. It demonstrates a pivot to the initial surgical plan yielding a favorable outcome with the preservation of renal function in a high-risk and complex patient.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery. Brief reports and innovations\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery. Brief reports and innovations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277268782400103X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery. Brief reports and innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277268782400103X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胸腹主动脉瘤(TAAA)修复仍然与相当高的发病率和死亡率相关。血管内修复提供了一种侵入性较小的替代方法,但受到设备可用性和解剖学限制的限制。混合方法,结合开放内脏去分支和血管内排除,是不适合完全开放修复的高风险患者的可行选择。临床总结:我们报告了一名62岁男性患者,他有高血压、高脂血症、癫痫和经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后严重主动脉瓣狭窄的病史,采用三期混合修复IV型TAAA。该修复最初计划为单级操作。然而,由于在手术干预时发现明显的炎症,因此进行了分阶段修复。炎症导致主动脉和血管分离和急性失血困难,使分阶段入路成为最安全、最可行的选择。在最初的手术中,患者接受了内脏去分支,随后进行了血管内胸主动脉支架置入,最后进行了医生改良的右肾动脉内移植物并排除了主动脉瘤。结论本病例说明了在主动脉暴露时发现炎症特征而不能按计划完成初始手术时,分阶段混合入路在TAAA修复中的成功应用。它证明了一个支点,最初的手术计划产生有利的结果与保存肾功能的高风险和复杂的病人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hybrid Repair of a Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm as a Bailout Option from Open Repair

Introduction

Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair remains associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. An endovascular repair offers a less invasive alternative but is limited by the availability of devices and anatomical constraints. A hybrid approach, combining open visceral debranching with endovascular exclusion, is a viable option for high-risk patients unsuitable for complete open repair.

Clinical summary

We report a three-stage hybrid repair of a type IV TAAA in a 62-year-old male with a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, seizures, and severe aortic stenosis post-transcatheter aorta valve replacement (TAVR). This repair was initially planned for a single-stage operation. However, due to significant inflammatory findings at the time of the surgical intervention, a staged repair was performed. The inflammation caused significant difficulty in the aorta and vessel dissection and acute blood loss, making this staged approach the safest and most feasible option. On the initial operation, the patient underwent visceral debranching, followed by endovascular thoracic aortic stent placement and a final, physician-modified endograft addressing the right renal artery and exclusion of the aortic aneurysm.

Conclusion

This case illustrates the successful use of a staged hybrid approach for TAAA repair when the initial operation cannot be completed as planned due to inflammatory features found at the time of aortic exposure. It demonstrates a pivot to the initial surgical plan yielding a favorable outcome with the preservation of renal function in a high-risk and complex patient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
62 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信