戈尔髂支假体复发性断连:病例报告及影响因素回顾

Catherine Boudreau, Caroline Caradu, Xavier Bérard, Eric Ducasse
{"title":"戈尔髂支假体复发性断连:病例报告及影响因素回顾","authors":"Catherine Boudreau,&nbsp;Caroline Caradu,&nbsp;Xavier Bérard,&nbsp;Eric Ducasse","doi":"10.1016/j.avsurg.2025.100363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Iliac artery aneurysms (IAAs) which may coexist with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) or appear as isolated lesions, represent around 2 % of intra-abdominal aneurysms. Endovascular repair using iliac branch devices (IBDs) helps preserve internal iliac artery (IIA) perfusion, reducing complications like buttock claudication. However, device displacement and type III endoleaks are significant challenges, especially in tortuous anatomy.</div></div><div><h3>Report</h3><div>We report two cases of type III endoleak due to displacement of Gore Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (IBE). In the first case, a 60-year-old male with a left IAA experienced immediate postoperative IBE migration and type III endoleak, necessitating urgent reintervention with bridging stents. In the second, a 74-year-old male treated for a right IAA had recurrent IBE displacements over four years, with repeated type III endoleaks, managed by repeated stenting. Severe iliac tortuosity contributed to both cases.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>These cases highlight the complexities of IAA endovascular repair with IBDs, particularly the risk of device migration and endoleaks, with severe iliac tortuosity, device properties (e.g. conformability, low friction coefficient), and response to cardiac pulsatility increasing migration risk. Future studies should address these challenges, focusing on device design improvements and predictive imaging techniques, including artificial intelligence, to enhance long-term outcomes in IAA repair.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72235,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery. Brief reports and innovations","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recurrent disconnection of Gore Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis: Case report and review of contributing factors\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Boudreau,&nbsp;Caroline Caradu,&nbsp;Xavier Bérard,&nbsp;Eric Ducasse\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsurg.2025.100363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Iliac artery aneurysms (IAAs) which may coexist with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) or appear as isolated lesions, represent around 2 % of intra-abdominal aneurysms. Endovascular repair using iliac branch devices (IBDs) helps preserve internal iliac artery (IIA) perfusion, reducing complications like buttock claudication. However, device displacement and type III endoleaks are significant challenges, especially in tortuous anatomy.</div></div><div><h3>Report</h3><div>We report two cases of type III endoleak due to displacement of Gore Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (IBE). In the first case, a 60-year-old male with a left IAA experienced immediate postoperative IBE migration and type III endoleak, necessitating urgent reintervention with bridging stents. In the second, a 74-year-old male treated for a right IAA had recurrent IBE displacements over four years, with repeated type III endoleaks, managed by repeated stenting. Severe iliac tortuosity contributed to both cases.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>These cases highlight the complexities of IAA endovascular repair with IBDs, particularly the risk of device migration and endoleaks, with severe iliac tortuosity, device properties (e.g. conformability, low friction coefficient), and response to cardiac pulsatility increasing migration risk. Future studies should address these challenges, focusing on device design improvements and predictive imaging techniques, including artificial intelligence, to enhance long-term outcomes in IAA repair.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery. Brief reports and innovations\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery. Brief reports and innovations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772687825000042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery. Brief reports and innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772687825000042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

髂动脉动脉瘤(IAAs)可与腹主动脉瘤(AAAs)共存或表现为孤立病变,约占腹内动脉瘤的2%。使用髂分支装置(IBDs)进行血管内修复有助于保持髂内动脉(IIA)灌注,减少臀部跛行等并发症。然而,设备移位和III型内漏是一个重大挑战,特别是在弯曲的解剖中。我们报告2例III型内漏,原因是戈尔髂分支内假体移位。在第一例病例中,一名60岁男性左侧IAA患者术后立即发生IBE迁移和III型内漏,需要紧急再次介入搭桥支架。在第二例中,一名74岁的男性因右侧IAA接受治疗,在四年多的时间里反复出现IBE移位,反复出现III型内陷,通过反复支架置入治疗。严重的髂扭转导致了这两个病例。这些病例强调了ibd患者IAA血管内修复的复杂性,特别是器械迁移和内漏的风险,严重的髂弯曲、器械特性(如相容性、低摩擦系数)和对心脏搏动的反应增加了迁移风险。未来的研究应该解决这些挑战,专注于设备设计改进和预测成像技术,包括人工智能,以提高IAA修复的长期效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recurrent disconnection of Gore Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis: Case report and review of contributing factors

Introduction

Iliac artery aneurysms (IAAs) which may coexist with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) or appear as isolated lesions, represent around 2 % of intra-abdominal aneurysms. Endovascular repair using iliac branch devices (IBDs) helps preserve internal iliac artery (IIA) perfusion, reducing complications like buttock claudication. However, device displacement and type III endoleaks are significant challenges, especially in tortuous anatomy.

Report

We report two cases of type III endoleak due to displacement of Gore Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (IBE). In the first case, a 60-year-old male with a left IAA experienced immediate postoperative IBE migration and type III endoleak, necessitating urgent reintervention with bridging stents. In the second, a 74-year-old male treated for a right IAA had recurrent IBE displacements over four years, with repeated type III endoleaks, managed by repeated stenting. Severe iliac tortuosity contributed to both cases.

Discussion

These cases highlight the complexities of IAA endovascular repair with IBDs, particularly the risk of device migration and endoleaks, with severe iliac tortuosity, device properties (e.g. conformability, low friction coefficient), and response to cardiac pulsatility increasing migration risk. Future studies should address these challenges, focusing on device design improvements and predictive imaging techniques, including artificial intelligence, to enhance long-term outcomes in IAA repair.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
62 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信