金融创新可能阻碍可持续经济增长:两个新兴经济体的故事

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Arslan Qayyum , Aniqa Arslan , Arsalan Haneef Malik , Sajjad Nawaz Khan , Awais Ur Rehman , Muhammad Asim , Sadique Ahmad , Mohamed A. ElAffendi
{"title":"金融创新可能阻碍可持续经济增长:两个新兴经济体的故事","authors":"Arslan Qayyum ,&nbsp;Aniqa Arslan ,&nbsp;Arsalan Haneef Malik ,&nbsp;Sajjad Nawaz Khan ,&nbsp;Awais Ur Rehman ,&nbsp;Muhammad Asim ,&nbsp;Sadique Ahmad ,&nbsp;Mohamed A. ElAffendi","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study compares the sustainability of financial innovation, development, and economic growth in India and China, considering macro-economic factors like globalization, inflation, and monetary policies. It addresses the impact of financial development on sustainable economic growth by analyzing these two major emerging economies. The ARDL co-integration approach is used to assess long-run and short-run relationships among variables, focusing on sustainability. The results show a long-term co-integration among financial innovation, development, and economic growth, revealing challenges to sustainable development. Both countries show a negative long-term relationship between financial innovation, development, and economic growth, with India's impact larger in magnitude than China's. In contrast, short-term results are positive and significant for both nations. The ECT term suggests India requires more short-run adjustments to reach equilibrium. Overall, financial initiatives in both countries, amid globalization and monetary challenges, do not support sustainable long-term GDP growth but have short-term positive effects. China performs better due to smaller negative coefficients and fewer adjustments needed. The findings align with economic theories such as the Solow growth model and the theory of endogenous growth, emphasizing efficient allocation of financial resources for growth. This research adds valuable insights to the literature on sustainable economic outcomes in India and China, providing policymakers with guidance for future strategies to achieve sustainable growth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"11 1","pages":"Article 100446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial innovation can hamper the sustainable economic growth: A tale of two emerging economies\",\"authors\":\"Arslan Qayyum ,&nbsp;Aniqa Arslan ,&nbsp;Arsalan Haneef Malik ,&nbsp;Sajjad Nawaz Khan ,&nbsp;Awais Ur Rehman ,&nbsp;Muhammad Asim ,&nbsp;Sadique Ahmad ,&nbsp;Mohamed A. ElAffendi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study compares the sustainability of financial innovation, development, and economic growth in India and China, considering macro-economic factors like globalization, inflation, and monetary policies. It addresses the impact of financial development on sustainable economic growth by analyzing these two major emerging economies. The ARDL co-integration approach is used to assess long-run and short-run relationships among variables, focusing on sustainability. The results show a long-term co-integration among financial innovation, development, and economic growth, revealing challenges to sustainable development. Both countries show a negative long-term relationship between financial innovation, development, and economic growth, with India's impact larger in magnitude than China's. In contrast, short-term results are positive and significant for both nations. The ECT term suggests India requires more short-run adjustments to reach equilibrium. Overall, financial initiatives in both countries, amid globalization and monetary challenges, do not support sustainable long-term GDP growth but have short-term positive effects. China performs better due to smaller negative coefficients and fewer adjustments needed. The findings align with economic theories such as the Solow growth model and the theory of endogenous growth, emphasizing efficient allocation of financial resources for growth. This research adds valuable insights to the literature on sustainable economic outcomes in India and China, providing policymakers with guidance for future strategies to achieve sustainable growth.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100446\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853124002403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853124002403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到全球化、通货膨胀和货币政策等宏观经济因素,本研究比较了印度和中国金融创新、发展和经济增长的可持续性。它通过分析这两个主要新兴经济体来解决金融发展对可持续经济增长的影响。ARDL协整方法用于评估变量之间的长期和短期关系,重点关注可持续性。结果表明,金融创新、发展与经济增长之间存在长期协整关系,揭示了可持续发展面临的挑战。两国在金融创新、发展和经济增长之间表现出长期负相关关系,印度的影响比中国更大。相比之下,短期结果对两国都是积极和重要的。ECT术语表明,印度需要更多的短期调整才能达到平衡。总体而言,在全球化和货币挑战的背景下,两国的金融举措并不支持可持续的长期GDP增长,但会产生短期的积极影响。中国表现更好,因为负系数更小,需要的调整更少。这一发现与索洛增长模型和内生增长理论等经济理论相一致,强调为增长而有效配置金融资源。本研究为有关印度和中国可持续经济成果的文献提供了有价值的见解,为政策制定者提供了实现可持续增长的未来战略指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Financial innovation can hamper the sustainable economic growth: A tale of two emerging economies
This study compares the sustainability of financial innovation, development, and economic growth in India and China, considering macro-economic factors like globalization, inflation, and monetary policies. It addresses the impact of financial development on sustainable economic growth by analyzing these two major emerging economies. The ARDL co-integration approach is used to assess long-run and short-run relationships among variables, focusing on sustainability. The results show a long-term co-integration among financial innovation, development, and economic growth, revealing challenges to sustainable development. Both countries show a negative long-term relationship between financial innovation, development, and economic growth, with India's impact larger in magnitude than China's. In contrast, short-term results are positive and significant for both nations. The ECT term suggests India requires more short-run adjustments to reach equilibrium. Overall, financial initiatives in both countries, amid globalization and monetary challenges, do not support sustainable long-term GDP growth but have short-term positive effects. China performs better due to smaller negative coefficients and fewer adjustments needed. The findings align with economic theories such as the Solow growth model and the theory of endogenous growth, emphasizing efficient allocation of financial resources for growth. This research adds valuable insights to the literature on sustainable economic outcomes in India and China, providing policymakers with guidance for future strategies to achieve sustainable growth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
审稿时长
1 day
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信