用3d打印的环保砖增强缓慢的沙子过滤

Wathsala Benthota Pathiranage , Chloe Sharp , Yinshan Hong , Cecylia Williams , Omar Algharibeh , Anna McKnight , Clinton Williams , Hunain Alkhateb , Matteo D’Alessio
{"title":"用3d打印的环保砖增强缓慢的沙子过滤","authors":"Wathsala Benthota Pathiranage ,&nbsp;Chloe Sharp ,&nbsp;Yinshan Hong ,&nbsp;Cecylia Williams ,&nbsp;Omar Algharibeh ,&nbsp;Anna McKnight ,&nbsp;Clinton Williams ,&nbsp;Hunain Alkhateb ,&nbsp;Matteo D’Alessio","doi":"10.1016/j.clwat.2024.100061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wastewater reuse after adequate treatment represents a sustainable approach and a valuable alternative source to mitigate the current water scarcity. In wastewater treatment, low-cost and low-tech approaches draw attention as small/rural communities struggle to achieve the anticipated water quality standards due to insufficient funds, or expert knowledge in implementing and maintaining high-tech treatment methods. This study evaluated the ability of two low-cost and sustainable materials, clay and crawfish shell waste to produce 3D-printed bricks to remove turbidity, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Total Organic Carbon (TOC), total coliforms and <em>E. coli</em>. Additionally, the study included an investigation of their ability to remove contaminants of emerging concern (CECs). Three different bench-scale reactors were built for the study, 1) a reactor with 3D-printed crawfish shell waste bricks (90 % clay and 10 % crawfish shell waste by weight) with sand, 2) a reactor with 3D-printed clay bricks with sand, and 3) a control (without 3D printed bricks) with only sand. All three systems, including the control, effectively removed turbidity (up to 96 %), total coliforms (up to 99 %) and <em>E. coli</em> (up to 99 %). Although the changes in removal efficiencies were not statistically different, the sand filter with clay bricks showed the highest removal rates for turbidity (87.1 % ± 7.1), COD (55 % ± 18.6) and TOC (47 % ± 27). Among the different CECs analyzed, the highest removal rates were recorded for fluoxetine (100 % removal), diphenhydramine (&gt;90 % removal) and erythromycin (60 % – 100 % removal) regardless of the reactor used. However, the reactor with crawfish bricks outperformed the other two in removing CECs exhibiting a 40 % – 80 % removal such as trimethoprim, tramadol, irbesartan, guaifenesin, gabapentin and losartan, as well as CECs exhibiting a relatively low removal (10 – 40 %) including lidocaine and sucralose. Sucralose is the only emerging contaminant with a statistically significant difference among the reactors, with the crawfish bricks showing significantly higher removal compared to the clay bricks (<em>p</em> = 0.026).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100257,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Water","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100061"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing slow sand filtration with 3D-printed eco-friendly bricks\",\"authors\":\"Wathsala Benthota Pathiranage ,&nbsp;Chloe Sharp ,&nbsp;Yinshan Hong ,&nbsp;Cecylia Williams ,&nbsp;Omar Algharibeh ,&nbsp;Anna McKnight ,&nbsp;Clinton Williams ,&nbsp;Hunain Alkhateb ,&nbsp;Matteo D’Alessio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clwat.2024.100061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Wastewater reuse after adequate treatment represents a sustainable approach and a valuable alternative source to mitigate the current water scarcity. In wastewater treatment, low-cost and low-tech approaches draw attention as small/rural communities struggle to achieve the anticipated water quality standards due to insufficient funds, or expert knowledge in implementing and maintaining high-tech treatment methods. This study evaluated the ability of two low-cost and sustainable materials, clay and crawfish shell waste to produce 3D-printed bricks to remove turbidity, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Total Organic Carbon (TOC), total coliforms and <em>E. coli</em>. Additionally, the study included an investigation of their ability to remove contaminants of emerging concern (CECs). Three different bench-scale reactors were built for the study, 1) a reactor with 3D-printed crawfish shell waste bricks (90 % clay and 10 % crawfish shell waste by weight) with sand, 2) a reactor with 3D-printed clay bricks with sand, and 3) a control (without 3D printed bricks) with only sand. All three systems, including the control, effectively removed turbidity (up to 96 %), total coliforms (up to 99 %) and <em>E. coli</em> (up to 99 %). Although the changes in removal efficiencies were not statistically different, the sand filter with clay bricks showed the highest removal rates for turbidity (87.1 % ± 7.1), COD (55 % ± 18.6) and TOC (47 % ± 27). Among the different CECs analyzed, the highest removal rates were recorded for fluoxetine (100 % removal), diphenhydramine (&gt;90 % removal) and erythromycin (60 % – 100 % removal) regardless of the reactor used. However, the reactor with crawfish bricks outperformed the other two in removing CECs exhibiting a 40 % – 80 % removal such as trimethoprim, tramadol, irbesartan, guaifenesin, gabapentin and losartan, as well as CECs exhibiting a relatively low removal (10 – 40 %) including lidocaine and sucralose. Sucralose is the only emerging contaminant with a statistically significant difference among the reactors, with the crawfish bricks showing significantly higher removal compared to the clay bricks (<em>p</em> = 0.026).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Water\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100061\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950263224000590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950263224000590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经过适当处理的废水回用是一种可持续的方法,也是缓解当前水资源短缺的宝贵替代来源。在废水处理方面,低成本和低技术的方法引起了人们的注意,因为小/农村社区由于资金不足或在实施和维护高科技处理方法方面的专业知识不足而难以达到预期的水质标准。本研究评估了两种低成本和可持续的材料粘土和小龙虾壳废料生产3d打印砖的能力,以去除浊度、化学需氧量(COD)、总有机碳(TOC)、总大肠菌群和大肠杆菌。此外,该研究还包括对它们去除新出现的污染物(CECs)的能力的调查。为研究建立了三种不同的实验规模反应器,1)用3D打印的小龙虾壳废砖(按重量计为90% %粘土和10% %小龙虾壳废砖)加沙的反应器,2)用3D打印的粘土砖加沙的反应器,3)只用沙的对照组(没有3D打印砖)。所有三种系统,包括对照组,都能有效去除浊度(高达96% %)、总大肠菌群(高达99% %)和大肠杆菌(高达99% %)。尽管其去除效率的变化在统计学上没有不同,砂滤器的粘土砖显示浊度的去除率最高(87.1 % ±7.1 ),鳕鱼(55 % ±18.6 )和TOC(47 % ± 27)。在所分析的不同CECs中,无论采用何种反应器,氟西汀(去除率100 %)、苯海拉明(去除率90 %)和红霉素(去除率60 % - 100 %)的去除率最高。然而,小龙虾砖反应器在去除率方面优于其他两种反应器,其去除率为40 % - 80 %,如甲氧苄啶,曲马多,厄贝沙坦,愈创甘油醚,加巴喷丁和氯沙坦,以及去除率相对较低的CECs(10 - 40 %),包括利多卡因和三氯蔗糖。三氯蔗糖是各反应器间唯一具有统计学显著差异的新出现污染物,小龙虾砖的去除率明显高于粘土砖(p = 0.026)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing slow sand filtration with 3D-printed eco-friendly bricks
Wastewater reuse after adequate treatment represents a sustainable approach and a valuable alternative source to mitigate the current water scarcity. In wastewater treatment, low-cost and low-tech approaches draw attention as small/rural communities struggle to achieve the anticipated water quality standards due to insufficient funds, or expert knowledge in implementing and maintaining high-tech treatment methods. This study evaluated the ability of two low-cost and sustainable materials, clay and crawfish shell waste to produce 3D-printed bricks to remove turbidity, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Total Organic Carbon (TOC), total coliforms and E. coli. Additionally, the study included an investigation of their ability to remove contaminants of emerging concern (CECs). Three different bench-scale reactors were built for the study, 1) a reactor with 3D-printed crawfish shell waste bricks (90 % clay and 10 % crawfish shell waste by weight) with sand, 2) a reactor with 3D-printed clay bricks with sand, and 3) a control (without 3D printed bricks) with only sand. All three systems, including the control, effectively removed turbidity (up to 96 %), total coliforms (up to 99 %) and E. coli (up to 99 %). Although the changes in removal efficiencies were not statistically different, the sand filter with clay bricks showed the highest removal rates for turbidity (87.1 % ± 7.1), COD (55 % ± 18.6) and TOC (47 % ± 27). Among the different CECs analyzed, the highest removal rates were recorded for fluoxetine (100 % removal), diphenhydramine (>90 % removal) and erythromycin (60 % – 100 % removal) regardless of the reactor used. However, the reactor with crawfish bricks outperformed the other two in removing CECs exhibiting a 40 % – 80 % removal such as trimethoprim, tramadol, irbesartan, guaifenesin, gabapentin and losartan, as well as CECs exhibiting a relatively low removal (10 – 40 %) including lidocaine and sucralose. Sucralose is the only emerging contaminant with a statistically significant difference among the reactors, with the crawfish bricks showing significantly higher removal compared to the clay bricks (p = 0.026).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信