揭示公务员偏好:算法决策中的人机匹配vs.调节算法——来自调查实验的见解

IF 10 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Huanhuan Li , Zongfeng Sun , Jiacheng Xi
{"title":"揭示公务员偏好:算法决策中的人机匹配vs.调节算法——来自调查实验的见解","authors":"Huanhuan Li ,&nbsp;Zongfeng Sun ,&nbsp;Jiacheng Xi","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2025.102009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While research has explored trust in algorithmic decision-making, the factors shaping civil servants' trust perceptions remain underexamined. Using public value theory and technology adoption frameworks, this study employs a survey experiment to analyze the effects of human-machine matching and algorithm regulation on civil servants' trust and adoption inclination. The findings indicate that both factors independently influence adoption inclination, with trust perceptions mediating this relationship, but no interaction effect is observed. Addressing gaps in technology acceptance and ethical frameworks, this study highlights the importance of algorithm regulation and human-machine matching in advancing algorithmic governance and achieving public value through procedural and performance dimensions, offering practical implications for policy and governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48258,"journal":{"name":"Government Information Quarterly","volume":"42 1","pages":"Article 102009"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling civil servants' preferences: Human-machine matching vs. regulating algorithms in algorithmic decision-making——Insights from a survey experiment\",\"authors\":\"Huanhuan Li ,&nbsp;Zongfeng Sun ,&nbsp;Jiacheng Xi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.giq.2025.102009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While research has explored trust in algorithmic decision-making, the factors shaping civil servants' trust perceptions remain underexamined. Using public value theory and technology adoption frameworks, this study employs a survey experiment to analyze the effects of human-machine matching and algorithm regulation on civil servants' trust and adoption inclination. The findings indicate that both factors independently influence adoption inclination, with trust perceptions mediating this relationship, but no interaction effect is observed. Addressing gaps in technology acceptance and ethical frameworks, this study highlights the importance of algorithm regulation and human-machine matching in advancing algorithmic governance and achieving public value through procedural and performance dimensions, offering practical implications for policy and governance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Government Information Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 102009\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Government Information Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X25000036\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government Information Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X25000036","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然有研究探讨了算法决策中的信任,但影响公务员信任观念的因素仍未得到充分研究。本研究运用公共价值理论和技术采用框架,采用调查实验分析了人机匹配和算法调节对公务员信任和采用倾向的影响。研究结果表明,这两个因素独立影响收养倾向,信任感知在其中起中介作用,但不存在交互作用。为了解决技术接受和道德框架方面的差距,本研究强调了算法监管和人机匹配在推进算法治理和通过程序和绩效维度实现公共价值方面的重要性,为政策和治理提供了实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unveiling civil servants' preferences: Human-machine matching vs. regulating algorithms in algorithmic decision-making——Insights from a survey experiment
While research has explored trust in algorithmic decision-making, the factors shaping civil servants' trust perceptions remain underexamined. Using public value theory and technology adoption frameworks, this study employs a survey experiment to analyze the effects of human-machine matching and algorithm regulation on civil servants' trust and adoption inclination. The findings indicate that both factors independently influence adoption inclination, with trust perceptions mediating this relationship, but no interaction effect is observed. Addressing gaps in technology acceptance and ethical frameworks, this study highlights the importance of algorithm regulation and human-machine matching in advancing algorithmic governance and achieving public value through procedural and performance dimensions, offering practical implications for policy and governance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Government Information Quarterly
Government Information Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Government Information Quarterly (GIQ) delves into the convergence of policy, information technology, government, and the public. It explores the impact of policies on government information flows, the role of technology in innovative government services, and the dynamic between citizens and governing bodies in the digital age. GIQ serves as a premier journal, disseminating high-quality research and insights that bridge the realms of policy, information technology, government, and public engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信