越橘汁中不同感官属性与蔗糖及高强度甜味剂的相互作用

Kjersti Aaby, Josefine Skaret, Ingunn Berget, Paula Varela
{"title":"越橘汁中不同感官属性与蔗糖及高强度甜味剂的相互作用","authors":"Kjersti Aaby,&nbsp;Josefine Skaret,&nbsp;Ingunn Berget,&nbsp;Paula Varela","doi":"10.1016/j.afres.2024.100681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lingonberries are associated with several health benefits and have a distinct flavour, but the berries are also bitter, astringent and sour. Addition of a sweetener, traditionally sucrose, is necessary to increase palatability of lingonberry products. Meanwhile, there is a goal to reduce sugar consumption. Alternative sweeteners may, however, have different sensory profiles compared to sucrose. The aim of the study was to understand the changes in the sensory profiles of lingonberry juice sweetened with high intensity sweeteners (sucralose, aspartame or acesulfame K) alone or in combination (1/1), compared to sucrose (10 %). The sensory profiles of the lingonberry nectars were evaluated by quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA) and temporal-check-all-that-apply (TCATA). According to both QDA and TCATA results, the nectars sweetened with aspartame and the blend of aspartame and acesulfame K were most like the nectar with sucrose. These beverages were characterised by more sweet taste, fullness and sour flavour and less pungent sensation, acidic taste, and astringency than the other nectars. The nectars that differed most from the reference were those sweetened with sucralose, acesulfame K and the blend of aspartame and sucralose. The nectar with the blend of acesulfame K and sucralose had a similar temporal profile to the sucrose sweetened juice but was evaluated differently in the QDA. QDA and TCATA provided complementary insights, with QDA identifying static attributes and TCATA capturing dynamic changes in sensory perception over time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8168,"journal":{"name":"Applied Food Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100681"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The interplay of different sensory attributes in lingonberry nectars with sucrose and high intensity sweeteners\",\"authors\":\"Kjersti Aaby,&nbsp;Josefine Skaret,&nbsp;Ingunn Berget,&nbsp;Paula Varela\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.afres.2024.100681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Lingonberries are associated with several health benefits and have a distinct flavour, but the berries are also bitter, astringent and sour. Addition of a sweetener, traditionally sucrose, is necessary to increase palatability of lingonberry products. Meanwhile, there is a goal to reduce sugar consumption. Alternative sweeteners may, however, have different sensory profiles compared to sucrose. The aim of the study was to understand the changes in the sensory profiles of lingonberry juice sweetened with high intensity sweeteners (sucralose, aspartame or acesulfame K) alone or in combination (1/1), compared to sucrose (10 %). The sensory profiles of the lingonberry nectars were evaluated by quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA) and temporal-check-all-that-apply (TCATA). According to both QDA and TCATA results, the nectars sweetened with aspartame and the blend of aspartame and acesulfame K were most like the nectar with sucrose. These beverages were characterised by more sweet taste, fullness and sour flavour and less pungent sensation, acidic taste, and astringency than the other nectars. The nectars that differed most from the reference were those sweetened with sucralose, acesulfame K and the blend of aspartame and sucralose. The nectar with the blend of acesulfame K and sucralose had a similar temporal profile to the sucrose sweetened juice but was evaluated differently in the QDA. QDA and TCATA provided complementary insights, with QDA identifying static attributes and TCATA capturing dynamic changes in sensory perception over time.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Food Research\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100681\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Food Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772502224002919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772502224002919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越橘对健康有益,味道独特,但也有苦味、涩味和酸味。添加甜味剂,传统的蔗糖,是必要的,以增加越橘产品的适口性。同时,还有一个目标是减少糖的消耗。然而,与蔗糖相比,替代甜味剂可能具有不同的感官特征。该研究的目的是了解使用高强度甜味剂(三氯蔗糖、阿斯巴甜或安赛蜜K)单独或组合(1/1)与蔗糖(10%)相比,越橘汁的感官特征的变化。采用定量描述分析(QDA)和时间检查(TCATA)对越橘汁的感官特征进行了评价。根据QDA和TCATA的结果,阿斯巴甜和阿斯巴甜与安赛蜜K的混合物最接近加蔗糖的花蜜。这些饮料的特点是更甜,丰满和酸的味道和更少的刺激性,酸性和涩味比其他花蜜。与参考数据差异最大的是那些添加了三氯蔗糖、安赛蜜K以及阿斯巴甜和三氯蔗糖的混合物的花蜜。蔗糖素K和三氯蔗糖混合的花蜜与蔗糖加糖果汁具有相似的时间特征,但在QDA中评价不同。QDA和TCATA提供了互补的见解,QDA识别静态属性,TCATA捕捉感官知觉随时间的动态变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The interplay of different sensory attributes in lingonberry nectars with sucrose and high intensity sweeteners

The interplay of different sensory attributes in lingonberry nectars with sucrose and high intensity sweeteners
Lingonberries are associated with several health benefits and have a distinct flavour, but the berries are also bitter, astringent and sour. Addition of a sweetener, traditionally sucrose, is necessary to increase palatability of lingonberry products. Meanwhile, there is a goal to reduce sugar consumption. Alternative sweeteners may, however, have different sensory profiles compared to sucrose. The aim of the study was to understand the changes in the sensory profiles of lingonberry juice sweetened with high intensity sweeteners (sucralose, aspartame or acesulfame K) alone or in combination (1/1), compared to sucrose (10 %). The sensory profiles of the lingonberry nectars were evaluated by quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA) and temporal-check-all-that-apply (TCATA). According to both QDA and TCATA results, the nectars sweetened with aspartame and the blend of aspartame and acesulfame K were most like the nectar with sucrose. These beverages were characterised by more sweet taste, fullness and sour flavour and less pungent sensation, acidic taste, and astringency than the other nectars. The nectars that differed most from the reference were those sweetened with sucralose, acesulfame K and the blend of aspartame and sucralose. The nectar with the blend of acesulfame K and sucralose had a similar temporal profile to the sucrose sweetened juice but was evaluated differently in the QDA. QDA and TCATA provided complementary insights, with QDA identifying static attributes and TCATA capturing dynamic changes in sensory perception over time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信