复杂任务众包的阴暗面:系统的文献综述

IF 8.2 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Elodie Manthé , Rémi Mencarelli , Jessie Pallud
{"title":"复杂任务众包的阴暗面:系统的文献综述","authors":"Elodie Manthé ,&nbsp;Rémi Mencarelli ,&nbsp;Jessie Pallud","doi":"10.1016/j.im.2025.104108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Crowdsourcing (CS) has generated considerable excitement among practitioners in recent years, especially for the purpose of solving complex tasks. However, several failed CS initiatives have highlighted the difficulties of tapping into a crowd of contributors. Whereas most scholars consider CS activities to be sources of benefits for all actors involved, some scattered empirical results obtained in management literature challenge this assumption and demonstrate the existence of a dark side of CS. With a systematic literature review, the authors aim to identify various undesirable outcomes related to CS of complex tasks (CSCT). To do so, they reveal how all actors involved in CSCT activities—contributors, crowdsourcers, and CS platforms—can be both victims and perpetrators, possessing some characteristics that can produce detrimental effects but also activating mitigation mechanisms to counteract the dark side of CSCT activities. They also discuss the respective implications for academics and practitioners and suggest avenues for further research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56291,"journal":{"name":"Information & Management","volume":"62 3","pages":"Article 104108"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The dark side of crowdsourcing of complex tasks: A systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Elodie Manthé ,&nbsp;Rémi Mencarelli ,&nbsp;Jessie Pallud\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.im.2025.104108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Crowdsourcing (CS) has generated considerable excitement among practitioners in recent years, especially for the purpose of solving complex tasks. However, several failed CS initiatives have highlighted the difficulties of tapping into a crowd of contributors. Whereas most scholars consider CS activities to be sources of benefits for all actors involved, some scattered empirical results obtained in management literature challenge this assumption and demonstrate the existence of a dark side of CS. With a systematic literature review, the authors aim to identify various undesirable outcomes related to CS of complex tasks (CSCT). To do so, they reveal how all actors involved in CSCT activities—contributors, crowdsourcers, and CS platforms—can be both victims and perpetrators, possessing some characteristics that can produce detrimental effects but also activating mitigation mechanisms to counteract the dark side of CSCT activities. They also discuss the respective implications for academics and practitioners and suggest avenues for further research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information & Management\",\"volume\":\"62 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 104108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378720625000114\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information & Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378720625000114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,众包(CS)在从业者中引起了相当大的兴奋,尤其是在解决复杂任务方面。然而,几项失败的CS计划凸显了利用大量贡献者的困难。尽管大多数学者认为企业管理活动是所有参与者的利益来源,但管理学文献中获得的一些零散的实证结果挑战了这一假设,并证明了企业管理的阴暗面的存在。通过系统的文献综述,作者旨在识别与复杂任务cst (CSCT)相关的各种不良后果。为此,他们揭示了参与CSCT活动的所有参与者——贡献者、众包者和CS平台——既可以是受害者,也可以是肇事者,他们具有一些可能产生有害影响的特征,但也激活了缓解机制,以抵消CSCT活动的阴暗面。他们还讨论了各自对学术界和实践者的影响,并提出了进一步研究的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The dark side of crowdsourcing of complex tasks: A systematic literature review
Crowdsourcing (CS) has generated considerable excitement among practitioners in recent years, especially for the purpose of solving complex tasks. However, several failed CS initiatives have highlighted the difficulties of tapping into a crowd of contributors. Whereas most scholars consider CS activities to be sources of benefits for all actors involved, some scattered empirical results obtained in management literature challenge this assumption and demonstrate the existence of a dark side of CS. With a systematic literature review, the authors aim to identify various undesirable outcomes related to CS of complex tasks (CSCT). To do so, they reveal how all actors involved in CSCT activities—contributors, crowdsourcers, and CS platforms—can be both victims and perpetrators, possessing some characteristics that can produce detrimental effects but also activating mitigation mechanisms to counteract the dark side of CSCT activities. They also discuss the respective implications for academics and practitioners and suggest avenues for further research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information & Management
Information & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
123
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Information & Management is a publication that caters to researchers in the field of information systems as well as managers, professionals, administrators, and senior executives involved in designing, implementing, and managing Information Systems Applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信