关键金属:它们的矿物系统和勘探

Daniel Müller , David I. Groves , M. Santosh , Cheng-Xue Yang
{"title":"关键金属:它们的矿物系统和勘探","authors":"Daniel Müller ,&nbsp;David I. Groves ,&nbsp;M. Santosh ,&nbsp;Cheng-Xue Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.geogeo.2024.100323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Complex geological formation processes under a variety of tectonic regimes have led to a heterogeneous global distribution of the critical metal resources that will be increasingly in demand due to Net Zero and the clean energy transition. Although brownfield exploration around existing mines can add to inventories of some critical metals, including copper in the short to medium term, all mines have a finite life with many historical giants already exhausted. Therefore, without a revolution in metal recycling, successful global greenfield exploration is of key importance.</div><div>If greenfield exploration is to supply a significant proportion of critical metals to meet future supply for a sustainable economic future, it is imperative that superior conceptual models are employed for initial ground selection. This requires an understanding of the critical components of the wide variety of metallic mineral systems that contain these critical metals and their temporal distribution and tectonic settings. Greenfield exploration faces numerous challenges as new discoveries are commonly concealed by younger sedimentary cover and they occur in increasingly remote terrains and at greater depths, resulting in declining discovery rates despite rising budgets.</div><div>Some mineral systems have high preservation potential and are distributed within well-established temporal ranges in Earth history. These systems include orogenic gold, VMS-type Cu-Pb-Zn, intrusion-hosted Ni-Cu±PGE, carbonatite REE, and SEDEX, MVT, Broken Hill-type, and Zambian-type base-metal systems. Understanding the temporal range and tectonic setting of such critical mineral systems aids conceptual targeting to define new exploration spaces. However, many of the Precambrian critical mineral deposits within these systems are now situated in subdued topography and have experienced regolith development such that they have thick cover ranging from desert sands to thick complex regolith, to glacial till. All scenarios represent technical and financial challenges in terms of successful exploration using increasingly sophisticated remote sensing, geophysical, and geochemical survey methodologies.</div><div>A contrasting conceptual targeting scenario is provided by critical mineral systems that formed in convergent margin arc settings or in marginal terrestrial sedimentary basins. These include widespread porphyry-skarn Cu-Au-Mo systems, both high- and low-sulfidation epithermal Au-Ag systems, and more geographically restricted IRGD and Carlin-type systems. Where tectonic uplift rates are high, critical metal deposits of these systems are rapidly eroded and have low preservation potential and hence are largely confined to the Cenozoic with only rare systems beyond the late Mesozoic. Conceptual exploration is less challenging for this group as they are commonly situated in mountainous terrains where remote sensing spectral surveys are effective and deposit footprints are large due to vertically and/or laterally extensive hydrothermal alteration haloes. The downside is that most near-surface deposits and their related hydrothermal alteration zones have been discovered already as shown by declining discovery rates.</div><div>Clearly, exploration for critical metal mineral systems faces numerous severe geoscientific challenges. Mineral exploration is also challenged by the risk-averse nature of major mining companies coincident with low exploration budgets for junior exploration companies, strict environmental and indigenous population issues, and a negative public perception of mining in most western societies. Future exploration will increasingly need to utilize more sophisticated conceptual exploration models based on knowledge of the critical mineral systems summarized in this paper. In the future, this may be enhanced by interpretation of geological Big Data sets supported by artificial intelligence (A.I.), as discussed elsewhere in this Special Issue. There is a clear imperative for mineral exploration to increase critical metal supply and enhance the possibility of a sustainable future for our materials-based civilization if the clean energy transition continues to consume critical metals at ever increasing rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100582,"journal":{"name":"Geosystems and Geoenvironment","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical metals: Their mineral systems and exploration\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Müller ,&nbsp;David I. Groves ,&nbsp;M. Santosh ,&nbsp;Cheng-Xue Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geogeo.2024.100323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Complex geological formation processes under a variety of tectonic regimes have led to a heterogeneous global distribution of the critical metal resources that will be increasingly in demand due to Net Zero and the clean energy transition. Although brownfield exploration around existing mines can add to inventories of some critical metals, including copper in the short to medium term, all mines have a finite life with many historical giants already exhausted. Therefore, without a revolution in metal recycling, successful global greenfield exploration is of key importance.</div><div>If greenfield exploration is to supply a significant proportion of critical metals to meet future supply for a sustainable economic future, it is imperative that superior conceptual models are employed for initial ground selection. This requires an understanding of the critical components of the wide variety of metallic mineral systems that contain these critical metals and their temporal distribution and tectonic settings. Greenfield exploration faces numerous challenges as new discoveries are commonly concealed by younger sedimentary cover and they occur in increasingly remote terrains and at greater depths, resulting in declining discovery rates despite rising budgets.</div><div>Some mineral systems have high preservation potential and are distributed within well-established temporal ranges in Earth history. These systems include orogenic gold, VMS-type Cu-Pb-Zn, intrusion-hosted Ni-Cu±PGE, carbonatite REE, and SEDEX, MVT, Broken Hill-type, and Zambian-type base-metal systems. Understanding the temporal range and tectonic setting of such critical mineral systems aids conceptual targeting to define new exploration spaces. However, many of the Precambrian critical mineral deposits within these systems are now situated in subdued topography and have experienced regolith development such that they have thick cover ranging from desert sands to thick complex regolith, to glacial till. All scenarios represent technical and financial challenges in terms of successful exploration using increasingly sophisticated remote sensing, geophysical, and geochemical survey methodologies.</div><div>A contrasting conceptual targeting scenario is provided by critical mineral systems that formed in convergent margin arc settings or in marginal terrestrial sedimentary basins. These include widespread porphyry-skarn Cu-Au-Mo systems, both high- and low-sulfidation epithermal Au-Ag systems, and more geographically restricted IRGD and Carlin-type systems. Where tectonic uplift rates are high, critical metal deposits of these systems are rapidly eroded and have low preservation potential and hence are largely confined to the Cenozoic with only rare systems beyond the late Mesozoic. Conceptual exploration is less challenging for this group as they are commonly situated in mountainous terrains where remote sensing spectral surveys are effective and deposit footprints are large due to vertically and/or laterally extensive hydrothermal alteration haloes. The downside is that most near-surface deposits and their related hydrothermal alteration zones have been discovered already as shown by declining discovery rates.</div><div>Clearly, exploration for critical metal mineral systems faces numerous severe geoscientific challenges. Mineral exploration is also challenged by the risk-averse nature of major mining companies coincident with low exploration budgets for junior exploration companies, strict environmental and indigenous population issues, and a negative public perception of mining in most western societies. Future exploration will increasingly need to utilize more sophisticated conceptual exploration models based on knowledge of the critical mineral systems summarized in this paper. In the future, this may be enhanced by interpretation of geological Big Data sets supported by artificial intelligence (A.I.), as discussed elsewhere in this Special Issue. There is a clear imperative for mineral exploration to increase critical metal supply and enhance the possibility of a sustainable future for our materials-based civilization if the clean energy transition continues to consume critical metals at ever increasing rates.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geosystems and Geoenvironment\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geosystems and Geoenvironment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772883824000736\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosystems and Geoenvironment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772883824000736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在各种构造制度下的复杂地质形成过程导致了关键金属资源的异质性全球分布,由于净零和清洁能源转型,这些资源的需求将日益增加。虽然在现有矿山周围的棕地勘探可以在中短期内增加一些关键金属的库存,包括铜,但所有矿山的寿命都是有限的,许多历史上的巨头已经枯竭。因此,在没有金属回收革命的情况下,成功的全球绿地勘探至关重要。如果绿地勘探是为了提供相当大比例的关键金属,以满足未来可持续经济的未来供应,那么在最初的地面选择中采用优越的概念模型是必不可少的。这需要了解包含这些关键金属的各种金属矿物系统的关键组成部分及其时间分布和构造环境。绿地勘探面临着许多挑战,因为新发现通常被较年轻的沉积层所掩盖,而且它们出现在越来越遥远的地形和更深的深度,导致尽管预算增加,但发现率却在下降。有些矿物系统具有很高的保存潜力,分布在地球历史上确定的时间范围内。这些体系包括造山带金、vms型铜铅锌、侵入型Ni-Cu±PGE、碳酸盐岩REE、SEDEX、MVT、Broken hill型和赞比亚型贱金属体系。了解这些关键矿物系统的时间范围和构造背景,有助于确定新的勘探空间。然而,这些系统中的许多前寒武纪关键矿床现在位于较低的地形中,并且经历了风化层的发育,因此它们具有从沙漠砂到厚的复杂风化层到冰碛物的厚覆盖层。在使用日益复杂的遥感、地球物理和地球化学测量方法进行成功勘探方面,所有方案都代表着技术和财务方面的挑战。形成于会聚边缘弧环境或边缘陆相沉积盆地的关键矿物系统提供了一个对比的概念性目标情景。其中包括广泛分布的斑岩-矽卡岩型Cu-Au-Mo系统,高硫化和低硫化浅热液型Au-Ag系统,以及更受地理限制的IRGD和carlin型系统。在构造隆升速率高的地区,这些体系的关键金属矿床被迅速侵蚀,保存潜力低,因此主要局限于新生代,只有少数体系超过晚中生代。概念勘探对这一组来说挑战性较小,因为它们通常位于山区,遥感光谱测量有效,由于垂直和/或横向广泛的热液蚀变晕,矿床足迹很大。缺点是大多数近地表矿床及其相关的热液蚀变带已经被发现,如发现率下降所示。显然,关键金属矿物系统的勘探面临着许多严峻的地球科学挑战。矿物勘探也受到主要采矿公司不愿冒险的性质的挑战,同时初级勘探公司的勘探预算较低,严格的环境和土著人口问题,以及大多数西方社会公众对采矿的消极看法。未来的勘探将越来越需要利用基于本文总结的关键矿物系统知识的更复杂的概念勘探模型。在未来,这可能会通过人工智能(A.I.)支持的地质大数据集的解释得到加强,正如本期特刊的其他地方所讨论的那样。如果清洁能源转型继续以不断增长的速度消耗关键金属,那么矿产勘探显然必须增加关键金属的供应,并增强我们以材料为基础的文明可持续未来的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Critical metals: Their mineral systems and exploration

Critical metals: Their mineral systems and exploration
Complex geological formation processes under a variety of tectonic regimes have led to a heterogeneous global distribution of the critical metal resources that will be increasingly in demand due to Net Zero and the clean energy transition. Although brownfield exploration around existing mines can add to inventories of some critical metals, including copper in the short to medium term, all mines have a finite life with many historical giants already exhausted. Therefore, without a revolution in metal recycling, successful global greenfield exploration is of key importance.
If greenfield exploration is to supply a significant proportion of critical metals to meet future supply for a sustainable economic future, it is imperative that superior conceptual models are employed for initial ground selection. This requires an understanding of the critical components of the wide variety of metallic mineral systems that contain these critical metals and their temporal distribution and tectonic settings. Greenfield exploration faces numerous challenges as new discoveries are commonly concealed by younger sedimentary cover and they occur in increasingly remote terrains and at greater depths, resulting in declining discovery rates despite rising budgets.
Some mineral systems have high preservation potential and are distributed within well-established temporal ranges in Earth history. These systems include orogenic gold, VMS-type Cu-Pb-Zn, intrusion-hosted Ni-Cu±PGE, carbonatite REE, and SEDEX, MVT, Broken Hill-type, and Zambian-type base-metal systems. Understanding the temporal range and tectonic setting of such critical mineral systems aids conceptual targeting to define new exploration spaces. However, many of the Precambrian critical mineral deposits within these systems are now situated in subdued topography and have experienced regolith development such that they have thick cover ranging from desert sands to thick complex regolith, to glacial till. All scenarios represent technical and financial challenges in terms of successful exploration using increasingly sophisticated remote sensing, geophysical, and geochemical survey methodologies.
A contrasting conceptual targeting scenario is provided by critical mineral systems that formed in convergent margin arc settings or in marginal terrestrial sedimentary basins. These include widespread porphyry-skarn Cu-Au-Mo systems, both high- and low-sulfidation epithermal Au-Ag systems, and more geographically restricted IRGD and Carlin-type systems. Where tectonic uplift rates are high, critical metal deposits of these systems are rapidly eroded and have low preservation potential and hence are largely confined to the Cenozoic with only rare systems beyond the late Mesozoic. Conceptual exploration is less challenging for this group as they are commonly situated in mountainous terrains where remote sensing spectral surveys are effective and deposit footprints are large due to vertically and/or laterally extensive hydrothermal alteration haloes. The downside is that most near-surface deposits and their related hydrothermal alteration zones have been discovered already as shown by declining discovery rates.
Clearly, exploration for critical metal mineral systems faces numerous severe geoscientific challenges. Mineral exploration is also challenged by the risk-averse nature of major mining companies coincident with low exploration budgets for junior exploration companies, strict environmental and indigenous population issues, and a negative public perception of mining in most western societies. Future exploration will increasingly need to utilize more sophisticated conceptual exploration models based on knowledge of the critical mineral systems summarized in this paper. In the future, this may be enhanced by interpretation of geological Big Data sets supported by artificial intelligence (A.I.), as discussed elsewhere in this Special Issue. There is a clear imperative for mineral exploration to increase critical metal supply and enhance the possibility of a sustainable future for our materials-based civilization if the clean energy transition continues to consume critical metals at ever increasing rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信