他们是在为我们工作吗？2006-2020年美国总统选举中政府绩效评估的地理比较

IF 5.7 1区社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY

Journal of Rural Studies Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103575

Chelsea N. Kaufman

{"title":"他们是在为我们工作吗？2006-2020年美国总统选举中政府绩效评估的地理比较","authors":"Chelsea N. Kaufman","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent presidential elections in the United States have featured rural-urban polarization. Rural Americans have been characterized as feeling that the government is working for others, not them, which could lead to a preference for candidates who they expect to reduce the size of government. Using data from the Cooperative Congressional Election Studies surveys from 2006 to 2020, I compare how residents of rural, suburban, and urban areas evaluate government performance and the effects of these evaluations in presidential elections. I compare their presidential approval ratings; retrospective economic performance assessments; and views concerning government corruption. The results show increasingly partisan patterns in government performance assessments, but do not indicate that place of residence is a key factor in one's presidential vote once these other factors are accounted for.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 103575"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are they working for us? A geographic comparison of United States government performance evaluations in presidential elections, 2006–2020\",\"authors\":\"Chelsea N. Kaufman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recent presidential elections in the United States have featured rural-urban polarization. Rural Americans have been characterized as feeling that the government is working for others, not them, which could lead to a preference for candidates who they expect to reduce the size of government. Using data from the Cooperative Congressional Election Studies surveys from 2006 to 2020, I compare how residents of rural, suburban, and urban areas evaluate government performance and the effects of these evaluations in presidential elections. I compare their presidential approval ratings; retrospective economic performance assessments; and views concerning government corruption. The results show increasingly partisan patterns in government performance assessments, but do not indicate that place of residence is a key factor in one's presidential vote once these other factors are accounted for.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103575\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725000154\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725000154","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

最近美国总统选举的特点是城乡两极分化。农村美国人的特点是觉得政府是在为别人服务，而不是为他们服务，这可能会导致他们更倾向于那些希望缩小政府规模的候选人。利用2006年至2020年合作国会选举研究调查的数据，我比较了农村、郊区和城市地区的居民如何评估政府绩效，以及这些评估对总统选举的影响。我比较了他们的总统支持率；回顾性经济绩效评估；以及对政府腐败的看法。调查结果显示，在政府绩效评估中，党派倾向越来越明显，但是，一旦考虑到其他因素，并没有表明居住地是一个人竞选总统的关键因素。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Are they working for us? A geographic comparison of United States government performance evaluations in presidential elections, 2006–2020

Recent presidential elections in the United States have featured rural-urban polarization. Rural Americans have been characterized as feeling that the government is working for others, not them, which could lead to a preference for candidates who they expect to reduce the size of government. Using data from the Cooperative Congressional Election Studies surveys from 2006 to 2020, I compare how residents of rural, suburban, and urban areas evaluate government performance and the effects of these evaluations in presidential elections. I compare their presidential approval ratings; retrospective economic performance assessments; and views concerning government corruption. The results show increasingly partisan patterns in government performance assessments, but do not indicate that place of residence is a key factor in one's presidential vote once these other factors are accounted for.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Rural Studies Multiple-

CiteScore

9.80

自引率

9.80%

发文量

286

期刊介绍： The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.