工作记忆和熟练程度对短语成长的影响:中国英语学习者议论文写作中形容词-名词组合的纵向研究

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Lujie Zheng , Sheena Kaur , Azlin Zaiti Zainal
{"title":"工作记忆和熟练程度对短语成长的影响:中国英语学习者议论文写作中形容词-名词组合的纵向研究","authors":"Lujie Zheng ,&nbsp;Sheena Kaur ,&nbsp;Azlin Zaiti Zainal","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Phraseological knowledge has gained popularity as a critical predictor of writing assessment in second and foreign language (L2/FL) learner corpus research. However, past phraseological studies on learners with different levels of language competency have overlooked multidimensional collocational indices and the potential influence of cognitive characteristics. This study, employing multiple collocational measures, tracks the growth of adjective-noun combinations in the English argumentative writings of a longitudinal cohort of 148 Chinese EFL learners over four months and explores the effects of language proficiency and working memory (WM) on their phraseological growth. Our findings revealed a general upward pattern in learners’ overall development, despite some slight fluctuations. Notably, the mixed-effects models indicated that time alone had a negative impact on learners’ use of high-frequency, diverse, and strongly associated combinations. However, language proficiency and WM modulated this process, as learners with higher proficiency or greater WM demonstrated temporal improvement across most indices. The interplay among time, language proficiency, and WM presented a more complex image in which high-proficient learners showed a sloping trend on all collocational variables as WM capacity increased, suggesting a potential impact of cognitive overload. These findings offer valuable insights for teaching and identify prospective directions for future research into phraseological knowledge development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 100915"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of working memory and proficiency on phraseological growth: A longitudinal study of adjective-noun combinations in Chinese EFL learners’ argumentative writing\",\"authors\":\"Lujie Zheng ,&nbsp;Sheena Kaur ,&nbsp;Azlin Zaiti Zainal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Phraseological knowledge has gained popularity as a critical predictor of writing assessment in second and foreign language (L2/FL) learner corpus research. However, past phraseological studies on learners with different levels of language competency have overlooked multidimensional collocational indices and the potential influence of cognitive characteristics. This study, employing multiple collocational measures, tracks the growth of adjective-noun combinations in the English argumentative writings of a longitudinal cohort of 148 Chinese EFL learners over four months and explores the effects of language proficiency and working memory (WM) on their phraseological growth. Our findings revealed a general upward pattern in learners’ overall development, despite some slight fluctuations. Notably, the mixed-effects models indicated that time alone had a negative impact on learners’ use of high-frequency, diverse, and strongly associated combinations. However, language proficiency and WM modulated this process, as learners with higher proficiency or greater WM demonstrated temporal improvement across most indices. The interplay among time, language proficiency, and WM presented a more complex image in which high-proficient learners showed a sloping trend on all collocational variables as WM capacity increased, suggesting a potential impact of cognitive overload. These findings offer valuable insights for teaching and identify prospective directions for future research into phraseological knowledge development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessing Writing\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100915\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessing Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293525000029\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293525000029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在第二语言和外语(L2/FL)学习者语料库研究中,短语知识作为写作评估的重要预测因素已受到广泛欢迎。然而,以往针对不同语言能力水平学习者的词汇学研究忽视了多维搭配指标和认知特征的潜在影响。本研究采用多种搭配方法,对148名中国英语学习者的英语议论文中形容词-名词组合进行了为期4个月的跟踪研究,并探讨了语言水平和工作记忆对其短语增长的影响。我们的研究结果显示,尽管有一些轻微的波动,但学习者的整体发展总体呈上升趋势。值得注意的是,混合效应模型表明,独处时间对学习者使用高频、多样化和强相关组合有负面影响。然而,语言熟练程度和WM调节了这一过程,因为熟练程度较高或WM较高的学习者在大多数指标上都表现出时间上的改善。时间、语言能力和WM之间的相互作用呈现出更为复杂的图像,高水平学习者在所有搭配变量上都呈现出随着WM能力增加而倾斜的趋势,表明认知超载的潜在影响。这些发现为教学提供了有价值的见解,并为未来短语知识发展的研究确定了前景方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of working memory and proficiency on phraseological growth: A longitudinal study of adjective-noun combinations in Chinese EFL learners’ argumentative writing
Phraseological knowledge has gained popularity as a critical predictor of writing assessment in second and foreign language (L2/FL) learner corpus research. However, past phraseological studies on learners with different levels of language competency have overlooked multidimensional collocational indices and the potential influence of cognitive characteristics. This study, employing multiple collocational measures, tracks the growth of adjective-noun combinations in the English argumentative writings of a longitudinal cohort of 148 Chinese EFL learners over four months and explores the effects of language proficiency and working memory (WM) on their phraseological growth. Our findings revealed a general upward pattern in learners’ overall development, despite some slight fluctuations. Notably, the mixed-effects models indicated that time alone had a negative impact on learners’ use of high-frequency, diverse, and strongly associated combinations. However, language proficiency and WM modulated this process, as learners with higher proficiency or greater WM demonstrated temporal improvement across most indices. The interplay among time, language proficiency, and WM presented a more complex image in which high-proficient learners showed a sloping trend on all collocational variables as WM capacity increased, suggesting a potential impact of cognitive overload. These findings offer valuable insights for teaching and identify prospective directions for future research into phraseological knowledge development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assessing Writing
Assessing Writing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Assessing Writing is a refereed international journal providing a forum for ideas, research and practice on the assessment of written language. Assessing Writing publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges concerning writing assessments of all kinds, including traditional (direct and standardised forms of) testing of writing, alternative performance assessments (such as portfolios), workplace sampling and classroom assessment. The journal focuses on all stages of the writing assessment process, including needs evaluation, assessment creation, implementation, and validation, and test development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信