哺乳动物DNA复制的双重生命起源

IF 7.5 1区 生物学 Q1 CELL BIOLOGY
Olivier Hyrien, Guillaume Guilbaud, Torsten Krude
{"title":"哺乳动物DNA复制的双重生命起源","authors":"Olivier Hyrien, Guillaume Guilbaud, Torsten Krude","doi":"10.1101/gad.352227.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mammalian DNA replication origins have been historically difficult to identify and their determinants are still unresolved. Here, we first review methods developed over the last decades to map replication initiation sites either directly via initiation intermediates or indirectly via determining replication fork directionality profiles. We also discuss the factors that may specify these sites as replication initiation sites. Second, we address the controversy that has emerged from these results over whether origins are narrowly defined and localized to specific sites or are more dispersed and organized into broad zones. Ample evidence in favor of both scenarios currently creates an impression of unresolved confusion in the field. We attempt to formulate a synthesis of both models and to reconcile discrepant findings. It is evident that not only one approach is sufficient in isolation but that the combination of several is instrumental toward understanding initiation sites in mammalian genomes. We argue that an aggregation of several individual and often inefficient initiation sites into larger initiation zones and the existence of efficient unidirectional initiation sites and fork stalling at the borders of initiation zones can reconcile the different observations.","PeriodicalId":12591,"journal":{"name":"Genes & development","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The double life of mammalian DNA replication origins\",\"authors\":\"Olivier Hyrien, Guillaume Guilbaud, Torsten Krude\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/gad.352227.124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mammalian DNA replication origins have been historically difficult to identify and their determinants are still unresolved. Here, we first review methods developed over the last decades to map replication initiation sites either directly via initiation intermediates or indirectly via determining replication fork directionality profiles. We also discuss the factors that may specify these sites as replication initiation sites. Second, we address the controversy that has emerged from these results over whether origins are narrowly defined and localized to specific sites or are more dispersed and organized into broad zones. Ample evidence in favor of both scenarios currently creates an impression of unresolved confusion in the field. We attempt to formulate a synthesis of both models and to reconcile discrepant findings. It is evident that not only one approach is sufficient in isolation but that the combination of several is instrumental toward understanding initiation sites in mammalian genomes. We argue that an aggregation of several individual and often inefficient initiation sites into larger initiation zones and the existence of efficient unidirectional initiation sites and fork stalling at the borders of initiation zones can reconcile the different observations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genes & development\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genes & development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.352227.124\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genes & development","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.352227.124","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

哺乳动物DNA复制的起源一直难以确定,其决定因素仍未解决。在这里,我们首先回顾了过去几十年来发展起来的方法,这些方法直接通过起始中间体或间接通过确定复制叉的方向性概况来绘制复制起始位点。我们还讨论了可能指定这些位点为复制起始位点的因素。其次,我们解决了从这些结果中出现的争议,即起源是否被狭窄地定义并局限于特定的地点,还是更分散并组织成广泛的区域。支持这两种情况的充分证据目前给人的印象是该领域尚未解决的混乱。我们试图制定两个模型的综合和调和差异的发现。很明显,不仅一种方法单独是足够的,而且几种方法的结合有助于理解哺乳动物基因组的起始位点。我们认为,几个单独的、通常是低效的起始点聚集成更大的起始区,以及在起始区边界存在高效的单向起始点和分叉停顿,可以调和不同的观察结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The double life of mammalian DNA replication origins
Mammalian DNA replication origins have been historically difficult to identify and their determinants are still unresolved. Here, we first review methods developed over the last decades to map replication initiation sites either directly via initiation intermediates or indirectly via determining replication fork directionality profiles. We also discuss the factors that may specify these sites as replication initiation sites. Second, we address the controversy that has emerged from these results over whether origins are narrowly defined and localized to specific sites or are more dispersed and organized into broad zones. Ample evidence in favor of both scenarios currently creates an impression of unresolved confusion in the field. We attempt to formulate a synthesis of both models and to reconcile discrepant findings. It is evident that not only one approach is sufficient in isolation but that the combination of several is instrumental toward understanding initiation sites in mammalian genomes. We argue that an aggregation of several individual and often inefficient initiation sites into larger initiation zones and the existence of efficient unidirectional initiation sites and fork stalling at the borders of initiation zones can reconcile the different observations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genes & development
Genes & development 生物-发育生物学
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
1.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Genes & Development is a research journal published in association with The Genetics Society. It publishes high-quality research papers in the areas of molecular biology, molecular genetics, and related fields. The journal features various research formats including Research papers, short Research Communications, and Resource/Methodology papers. Genes & Development has gained recognition and is considered as one of the Top Five Research Journals in the field of Molecular Biology and Genetics. It has an impressive Impact Factor of 12.89. The journal is ranked #2 among Developmental Biology research journals, #5 in Genetics and Heredity, and is among the Top 20 in Cell Biology (according to ISI Journal Citation Reports®, 2021).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信