在存在系统误差的情况下,卫星测高观测到的M $$_2$$海潮趋势

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Richard D. Ray, Michael Schindelegger
{"title":"在存在系统误差的情况下,卫星测高观测到的M $$_2$$海潮趋势","authors":"Richard D. Ray, Michael Schindelegger","doi":"10.1007/s00190-025-01935-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Trends in the deep-ocean M<span>\\(_2\\)</span> barotropic tide, deduced from nearly three decades of satellite altimetry and recently presented by Opel et al. (Commun Earth Environ 5:261, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01432-5, 2024), are here updated with a slightly longer time series and with a focus on potential systematic errors. Tidal changes are very small, of order 0.2 mm/year or less, with a tendency for decreasing amplitudes, which is evidently a response to the ocean’s increasing stratification and an increasing energy loss to baroclinic motion. A variety of systematic errors in the satellite altimeter system potentially corrupt these small trend estimates. The Dynamic Atmosphere Correction (DAC), derived from an ocean model and used for de-aliasing, introduces a spurious trend (exceeding 0.1 mm/year in places) caused by changes in ECMWF atmospheric tides. Both operational and reanalysis atmospheric tides have spurious trends over the altimeter era. Tidally coherent errors in satellite orbits, including from use of inconsistent tidal geocenter models, are more difficult to bound, although differences between two sets of satellite ephemerides are found to reach 0.1 mm/year for M<span>\\(_2\\)</span>. Orbit errors are more deleterious for some other constituents, including the annual cycle. Tidal leakage in the “mesoscale correction,” needed here to suppress non-tidal ocean variability, is a known potential problem, and if the leakage changes over time, it impacts ocean-tide trend estimation. Tests show the error is likely small in the open ocean (<span>\\(&lt;0.04\\)</span> mm/year) but large in some marginal seas (<span>\\(&gt;0.2\\)</span> mm/year). Potential contamination from other altimeter corrections (e.g., ionospheric path delay) is likely negligible for M<span>\\(_2\\)</span> but can be difficult to bound.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"1209 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in the M $$_2$$ ocean tide observed by satellite altimetry in the presence of systematic errors\",\"authors\":\"Richard D. Ray, Michael Schindelegger\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00190-025-01935-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Trends in the deep-ocean M<span>\\\\(_2\\\\)</span> barotropic tide, deduced from nearly three decades of satellite altimetry and recently presented by Opel et al. (Commun Earth Environ 5:261, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01432-5, 2024), are here updated with a slightly longer time series and with a focus on potential systematic errors. Tidal changes are very small, of order 0.2 mm/year or less, with a tendency for decreasing amplitudes, which is evidently a response to the ocean’s increasing stratification and an increasing energy loss to baroclinic motion. A variety of systematic errors in the satellite altimeter system potentially corrupt these small trend estimates. The Dynamic Atmosphere Correction (DAC), derived from an ocean model and used for de-aliasing, introduces a spurious trend (exceeding 0.1 mm/year in places) caused by changes in ECMWF atmospheric tides. Both operational and reanalysis atmospheric tides have spurious trends over the altimeter era. Tidally coherent errors in satellite orbits, including from use of inconsistent tidal geocenter models, are more difficult to bound, although differences between two sets of satellite ephemerides are found to reach 0.1 mm/year for M<span>\\\\(_2\\\\)</span>. Orbit errors are more deleterious for some other constituents, including the annual cycle. Tidal leakage in the “mesoscale correction,” needed here to suppress non-tidal ocean variability, is a known potential problem, and if the leakage changes over time, it impacts ocean-tide trend estimation. Tests show the error is likely small in the open ocean (<span>\\\\(&lt;0.04\\\\)</span> mm/year) but large in some marginal seas (<span>\\\\(&gt;0.2\\\\)</span> mm/year). Potential contamination from other altimeter corrections (e.g., ionospheric path delay) is likely negligible for M<span>\\\\(_2\\\\)</span> but can be difficult to bound.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geodesy\",\"volume\":\"1209 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geodesy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-025-01935-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-025-01935-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深海M \(_2\)正压潮的趋势是根据近三十年的卫星测高数据推断出来的,最近由Opel等人提出(《共同地球环境》5:261,https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01432-5, 2024),这里用稍长的时间序列进行更新,并重点关注潜在的系统误差。潮汐变化非常小,约为0.2 mm/年或更小,并有幅度减小的趋势,这显然是对海洋分层增加和斜压运动能量损失增加的响应。卫星高度计系统中的各种系统误差可能会破坏这些小的趋势估计。动态大气校正(DAC)源自海洋模式,用于去混叠,引入了由ECMWF大气潮汐变化引起的伪趋势(在某些地方超过0.1毫米/年)。在高度计时代,操作和再分析的大气潮汐都有虚假的趋势。卫星轨道上的潮汐相干误差,包括使用不一致的潮汐地心模型,更难限定,尽管发现M \(_2\)两组卫星星历表之间的差异达到0.1 mm/年。轨道误差对其他一些成分更有害,包括年周期。“中尺度校正”中的潮汐泄漏是一个已知的潜在问题,这里需要抑制非潮汐海洋的变化,如果泄漏随着时间的推移而变化,它会影响海洋潮汐趋势的估计。试验表明,在开阔海域误差可能很小(\(<0.04\)毫米/年),但在一些边缘海域误差很大(\(>0.2\)毫米/年)。其他高度计校正的潜在污染(例如,电离层路径延迟)对于M \(_2\)可能可以忽略不计,但可能难以限定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in the M $$_2$$ ocean tide observed by satellite altimetry in the presence of systematic errors

Trends in the deep-ocean M\(_2\) barotropic tide, deduced from nearly three decades of satellite altimetry and recently presented by Opel et al. (Commun Earth Environ 5:261, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01432-5, 2024), are here updated with a slightly longer time series and with a focus on potential systematic errors. Tidal changes are very small, of order 0.2 mm/year or less, with a tendency for decreasing amplitudes, which is evidently a response to the ocean’s increasing stratification and an increasing energy loss to baroclinic motion. A variety of systematic errors in the satellite altimeter system potentially corrupt these small trend estimates. The Dynamic Atmosphere Correction (DAC), derived from an ocean model and used for de-aliasing, introduces a spurious trend (exceeding 0.1 mm/year in places) caused by changes in ECMWF atmospheric tides. Both operational and reanalysis atmospheric tides have spurious trends over the altimeter era. Tidally coherent errors in satellite orbits, including from use of inconsistent tidal geocenter models, are more difficult to bound, although differences between two sets of satellite ephemerides are found to reach 0.1 mm/year for M\(_2\). Orbit errors are more deleterious for some other constituents, including the annual cycle. Tidal leakage in the “mesoscale correction,” needed here to suppress non-tidal ocean variability, is a known potential problem, and if the leakage changes over time, it impacts ocean-tide trend estimation. Tests show the error is likely small in the open ocean (\(<0.04\) mm/year) but large in some marginal seas (\(>0.2\) mm/year). Potential contamination from other altimeter corrections (e.g., ionospheric path delay) is likely negligible for M\(_2\) but can be difficult to bound.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信