不同直径巩膜晶体对角膜生物力学和眼压的影响。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Juan Queiruga-Piñeiro, Irene Martínez-Alberquilla, Ignacio Rodríguez-Uña, Alberto Barros, Javier Lozano-Sanroma, Luis Fernández-Vega-Cueto, Jesús Merayo-Lloves
{"title":"不同直径巩膜晶体对角膜生物力学和眼压的影响。","authors":"Juan Queiruga-Piñeiro, Irene Martínez-Alberquilla, Ignacio Rodríguez-Uña, Alberto Barros, Javier Lozano-Sanroma, Luis Fernández-Vega-Cueto, Jesús Merayo-Lloves","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000001167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the short-term influence of scleral lenses (SL) with different diameters on intraocular pressure (IOP) and corneal biomechanics. A secondary objective was to investigate the relationship between fluid reservoir (FR) thickness and IOP and biomechanical parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty healthy subjects were randomly fitted with L1 (diameter of 15.80 mm) and L2 (diameter of 16.80 mm) on the right eye and worn for 2 hr. On IOP and corneal biomechanical parameters were measured with the CORVIS ST before and after SL removal. Fluid reservoir thickness at 0 and 2 hr of wear was measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Biomechanical parameters decreased after removal of L1 (-1.04±1.47 mm Hg) ( P <0.01) and L2 (-0.80±1.74 mm Hg) ( P =0.02). The biomechanical parameters A1T (-0.11±0.18 ms) ( P =0.01) and SP-A1 (-4.29±9.97 mm Hg/mm) ( P =0.02) decreased after L1 removal, whereas a decrease in highest concavity time (-0.21±0.50 m/s) ( P =0.03) and an increase in highest concavity radius (+0.17±0.43 mm) ( P =0.04) were observed after L2 removal. A significant, negative, and moderate correlation was found between highest concavity deformation amplitude and FR thickness with L1 (r=-0.42, P =0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The small changes in corneal biomechanical parameters and IOP values induced by short-term SL wear have no significant clinical impact and were not influenced by the diameter of the SL.</p>","PeriodicalId":50457,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"195-200"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure With Scleral Lenses of Different Diameters.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Queiruga-Piñeiro, Irene Martínez-Alberquilla, Ignacio Rodríguez-Uña, Alberto Barros, Javier Lozano-Sanroma, Luis Fernández-Vega-Cueto, Jesús Merayo-Lloves\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ICL.0000000000001167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the short-term influence of scleral lenses (SL) with different diameters on intraocular pressure (IOP) and corneal biomechanics. A secondary objective was to investigate the relationship between fluid reservoir (FR) thickness and IOP and biomechanical parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty healthy subjects were randomly fitted with L1 (diameter of 15.80 mm) and L2 (diameter of 16.80 mm) on the right eye and worn for 2 hr. On IOP and corneal biomechanical parameters were measured with the CORVIS ST before and after SL removal. Fluid reservoir thickness at 0 and 2 hr of wear was measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Biomechanical parameters decreased after removal of L1 (-1.04±1.47 mm Hg) ( P <0.01) and L2 (-0.80±1.74 mm Hg) ( P =0.02). The biomechanical parameters A1T (-0.11±0.18 ms) ( P =0.01) and SP-A1 (-4.29±9.97 mm Hg/mm) ( P =0.02) decreased after L1 removal, whereas a decrease in highest concavity time (-0.21±0.50 m/s) ( P =0.03) and an increase in highest concavity radius (+0.17±0.43 mm) ( P =0.04) were observed after L2 removal. A significant, negative, and moderate correlation was found between highest concavity deformation amplitude and FR thickness with L1 (r=-0.42, P =0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The small changes in corneal biomechanical parameters and IOP values induced by short-term SL wear have no significant clinical impact and were not influenced by the diameter of the SL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"195-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000001167\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000001167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价不同直径巩膜晶状体(SL)对眼压和角膜生物力学的短期影响。第二个目的是研究储层(FR)厚度与IOP和生物力学参数之间的关系。方法:30名健康受试者随机配戴右眼L1(直径15.80 mm)和L2(直径16.80 mm),佩戴2小时。用CORVIS ST测量眼压和角膜生物力学参数。使用前段光学相干断层扫描测量磨损0和2小时时的储层厚度。结果:L1取下后生物力学参数下降(-1.04±1.47 mm Hg) (p)。结论:短期SL磨损引起的角膜生物力学参数和IOP值的微小变化对临床无显著影响,且不受SL直径的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure With Scleral Lenses of Different Diameters.

Purpose: To evaluate the short-term influence of scleral lenses (SL) with different diameters on intraocular pressure (IOP) and corneal biomechanics. A secondary objective was to investigate the relationship between fluid reservoir (FR) thickness and IOP and biomechanical parameters.

Methods: Thirty healthy subjects were randomly fitted with L1 (diameter of 15.80 mm) and L2 (diameter of 16.80 mm) on the right eye and worn for 2 hr. On IOP and corneal biomechanical parameters were measured with the CORVIS ST before and after SL removal. Fluid reservoir thickness at 0 and 2 hr of wear was measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Results: Biomechanical parameters decreased after removal of L1 (-1.04±1.47 mm Hg) ( P <0.01) and L2 (-0.80±1.74 mm Hg) ( P =0.02). The biomechanical parameters A1T (-0.11±0.18 ms) ( P =0.01) and SP-A1 (-4.29±9.97 mm Hg/mm) ( P =0.02) decreased after L1 removal, whereas a decrease in highest concavity time (-0.21±0.50 m/s) ( P =0.03) and an increase in highest concavity radius (+0.17±0.43 mm) ( P =0.04) were observed after L2 removal. A significant, negative, and moderate correlation was found between highest concavity deformation amplitude and FR thickness with L1 (r=-0.42, P =0.02).

Conclusions: The small changes in corneal biomechanical parameters and IOP values induced by short-term SL wear have no significant clinical impact and were not influenced by the diameter of the SL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye & Contact Lens: Science and Clinical Practice is the official journal of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists (CLAO), an international educational association for anterior segment research and clinical practice of interest to ophthalmologists, optometrists, and other vision care providers and researchers. Focusing especially on contact lenses, it also covers dry eye disease, MGD, infections, toxicity of drops and contact lens care solutions, topography, cornea surgery and post-operative care, optics, refractive surgery and corneal stability (eg, UV cross-linking). Peer-reviewed and published six times annually, it is a highly respected scientific journal in its field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信