Roberto da Silva, Rodrigo M Joaquim, Thaís R W da Silva, Felipe Borges Oliveira, Pedro B de Andrade, José Ribamar Costa
{"title":"固定剂量肝素与体重调节肝素预防诊断性桡动脉置管后桡动脉闭塞的比较。","authors":"Roberto da Silva, Rodrigo M Joaquim, Thaís R W da Silva, Felipe Borges Oliveira, Pedro B de Andrade, José Ribamar Costa","doi":"10.25270/jic/24.00357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transradial access (TRA) catheterization has demonstrated significant reductions in procedural complications compared with other access routes. However, radial artery occlusion (RAO) remains a concern, and the optimal dose of heparin to mitigate RAO has yet to be determined. This study aims to address this gap by investigating the impact of weight-adjusted heparin doses on the incidence of RAO in patients undergoing diagnostic transradial catheterization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a subanalysis of a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating heparin dosing strategies in 1494 patients undergoing diagnostic transradial catheterization. All participants received a standard fixed dose of 5000 IU of heparin at the start of the procedure, with additional analyses stratifying patients by weight-adjusted heparin doses. RAO was assessed using Doppler ultrasound within 12 hours post-procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were grouped by weight-adjusted heparin quartiles: less than 58.14 IU/kg (Quartile 1), 58.14 to 65.79 IU/kg (Quartile 2), 65.79 to 74.63 IU/kg (Quartile 3), and greater than 74.63 IU/kg (Quartile 4). The incidence of RAO was similar across groups (2.1%, 2.6%, 2.8%, and 3.0%, respectively; P = .86). Comparisons of extreme dosages (less than 50 IU/kg vs greater than 80 IU/kg) also revealed no significant differences (1.9% vs 2.5%; P = .71). No major bleeding events were reported, and hematoma rates were consistent across groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Heparin doses adjusted by weight did not significantly influence the incidence of RAO when a baseline dose of 5000 IU was maintained. These findings reinforce the safety and efficacy of using 5000 IU heparin during diagnostic TRA procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of fixed dose versus weight-adjusted heparin on the prevention of radial artery occlusion after diagnostic transradial catheterization.\",\"authors\":\"Roberto da Silva, Rodrigo M Joaquim, Thaís R W da Silva, Felipe Borges Oliveira, Pedro B de Andrade, José Ribamar Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.25270/jic/24.00357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transradial access (TRA) catheterization has demonstrated significant reductions in procedural complications compared with other access routes. However, radial artery occlusion (RAO) remains a concern, and the optimal dose of heparin to mitigate RAO has yet to be determined. This study aims to address this gap by investigating the impact of weight-adjusted heparin doses on the incidence of RAO in patients undergoing diagnostic transradial catheterization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a subanalysis of a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating heparin dosing strategies in 1494 patients undergoing diagnostic transradial catheterization. All participants received a standard fixed dose of 5000 IU of heparin at the start of the procedure, with additional analyses stratifying patients by weight-adjusted heparin doses. RAO was assessed using Doppler ultrasound within 12 hours post-procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were grouped by weight-adjusted heparin quartiles: less than 58.14 IU/kg (Quartile 1), 58.14 to 65.79 IU/kg (Quartile 2), 65.79 to 74.63 IU/kg (Quartile 3), and greater than 74.63 IU/kg (Quartile 4). The incidence of RAO was similar across groups (2.1%, 2.6%, 2.8%, and 3.0%, respectively; P = .86). Comparisons of extreme dosages (less than 50 IU/kg vs greater than 80 IU/kg) also revealed no significant differences (1.9% vs 2.5%; P = .71). No major bleeding events were reported, and hematoma rates were consistent across groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Heparin doses adjusted by weight did not significantly influence the incidence of RAO when a baseline dose of 5000 IU was maintained. These findings reinforce the safety and efficacy of using 5000 IU heparin during diagnostic TRA procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Invasive Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Invasive Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/24.00357\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/24.00357","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of fixed dose versus weight-adjusted heparin on the prevention of radial artery occlusion after diagnostic transradial catheterization.
Objectives: Transradial access (TRA) catheterization has demonstrated significant reductions in procedural complications compared with other access routes. However, radial artery occlusion (RAO) remains a concern, and the optimal dose of heparin to mitigate RAO has yet to be determined. This study aims to address this gap by investigating the impact of weight-adjusted heparin doses on the incidence of RAO in patients undergoing diagnostic transradial catheterization.
Methods: This study is a subanalysis of a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating heparin dosing strategies in 1494 patients undergoing diagnostic transradial catheterization. All participants received a standard fixed dose of 5000 IU of heparin at the start of the procedure, with additional analyses stratifying patients by weight-adjusted heparin doses. RAO was assessed using Doppler ultrasound within 12 hours post-procedure.
Results: Patients were grouped by weight-adjusted heparin quartiles: less than 58.14 IU/kg (Quartile 1), 58.14 to 65.79 IU/kg (Quartile 2), 65.79 to 74.63 IU/kg (Quartile 3), and greater than 74.63 IU/kg (Quartile 4). The incidence of RAO was similar across groups (2.1%, 2.6%, 2.8%, and 3.0%, respectively; P = .86). Comparisons of extreme dosages (less than 50 IU/kg vs greater than 80 IU/kg) also revealed no significant differences (1.9% vs 2.5%; P = .71). No major bleeding events were reported, and hematoma rates were consistent across groups.
Conclusions: Heparin doses adjusted by weight did not significantly influence the incidence of RAO when a baseline dose of 5000 IU was maintained. These findings reinforce the safety and efficacy of using 5000 IU heparin during diagnostic TRA procedures.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Invasive Cardiology will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the invasive treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease.