安·洛曼镜头下的19世纪堕胎。

Q2 Social Sciences

AMA journal of ethics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1001/amajethics.2025.149

Suzanne Minor, Arianna Tapia, Sarah E Stumbar

{"title":"安·洛曼镜头下的19世纪堕胎。","authors":"Suzanne Minor, Arianna Tapia, Sarah E Stumbar","doi":"10.1001/amajethics.2025.149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ann Lohman, a midwife in the 1800s also known as Madame Restell, deserves our attention following the US Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization in June 2022. As abortion regulations change, it is important that health care communities learn from past experiences. This article examines the historical context in which Lohman practiced and draws out key lessons to be applied today.","PeriodicalId":38034,"journal":{"name":"AMA journal of ethics","volume":"27 2","pages":"E149-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abortion in the Nineteenth Century Through the Lens of Ann Lohman.\",\"authors\":\"Suzanne Minor, Arianna Tapia, Sarah E Stumbar\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/amajethics.2025.149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ann Lohman, a midwife in the 1800s also known as Madame Restell, deserves our attention following the US Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization in June 2022. As abortion regulations change, it is important that health care communities learn from past experiences. This article examines the historical context in which Lohman practiced and draws out key lessons to be applied today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMA journal of ethics\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"E149-158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMA journal of ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMA journal of ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

安·洛曼是19世纪的一名助产士，也被称为雷斯特尔夫人，在2022年6月美国最高法院对多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织一案作出裁决后，她值得我们关注。随着堕胎法规的变化，卫生保健社区从过去的经验中吸取教训是很重要的。本文考察了洛曼实践的历史背景，并得出了今天适用的关键教训。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Abortion in the Nineteenth Century Through the Lens of Ann Lohman.

Ann Lohman, a midwife in the 1800s also known as Madame Restell, deserves our attention following the US Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization in June 2022. As abortion regulations change, it is important that health care communities learn from past experiences. This article examines the historical context in which Lohman practiced and draws out key lessons to be applied today.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

AMA journal of ethics Social Sciences-Health (social science)

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

146

期刊介绍： The AMA Journal of Ethics exists to help medical students, physicians and all health care professionals navigate ethical decisions in service to patients and society. The journal publishes cases and expert commentary, medical education articles, policy discussions, peer-reviewed articles for journal-based and audio CME, visuals, and more. Since its inception as an editorially-independent journal, we promote ethics inquiry as a public good.