浓缩生长因子与富血小板纤维蛋白治疗坏死成熟牙齿的再生潜能比较:一项随机临床试验。

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Taghreed Salah, Wael Hussein, Heba Abdelkafy
{"title":"浓缩生长因子与富血小板纤维蛋白治疗坏死成熟牙齿的再生潜能比较:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Taghreed Salah, Wael Hussein, Heba Abdelkafy","doi":"10.1038/s41405-024-00288-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare the potential of two regenerative endodontic procedures, platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and concentrated growth factor (CGF), in the treatment of mature permanent teeth with necrotic pulps and periapical radiolucency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was written according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Randomized Trials in Endodontics 2020 guidelines. The study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry ( ClinicalTrials.gov ) with identifier number NCT06227533. Eighteen patients with mature necrotic maxillary incisors with periapical lesions were randomly divided into two groups, one group received treatment with PRF (n = 9), while the other received CGF (n = 9). Radiographs were taken at the beginning, 6 and 12 months after treatment, and confirmed with CBCT to assess periradicular healing. An electric pulp tester and cold test were used to determine whether pulp sensibility had been regained during the follow-up period. The statistical analysis used an independent t-test to compare different groups. Repeated measures ANOVA to compare pre-operative, after 6 months, and after 1 year in the same group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups experienced a considerable increase in healing at 6 and 12 months compared to baseline, with no significant differences seen regarding lesion size (p-value was 0.34) and relative bone density (p-value was 0.27). There was no substantial change in the tooth sensibility reading between both groups at 6 months (p-value = 0.34), After 1 year, both groups exhibited identical patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Revascularization using PRF or CGF successfully preserved mature teeth with necrotic pulps.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790909/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regenerative potential of concentrated growth factor compared to platelet-rich fibrin in treatment of necrotic mature teeth: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Taghreed Salah, Wael Hussein, Heba Abdelkafy\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41405-024-00288-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare the potential of two regenerative endodontic procedures, platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and concentrated growth factor (CGF), in the treatment of mature permanent teeth with necrotic pulps and periapical radiolucency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was written according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Randomized Trials in Endodontics 2020 guidelines. The study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry ( ClinicalTrials.gov ) with identifier number NCT06227533. Eighteen patients with mature necrotic maxillary incisors with periapical lesions were randomly divided into two groups, one group received treatment with PRF (n = 9), while the other received CGF (n = 9). Radiographs were taken at the beginning, 6 and 12 months after treatment, and confirmed with CBCT to assess periradicular healing. An electric pulp tester and cold test were used to determine whether pulp sensibility had been regained during the follow-up period. The statistical analysis used an independent t-test to compare different groups. Repeated measures ANOVA to compare pre-operative, after 6 months, and after 1 year in the same group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups experienced a considerable increase in healing at 6 and 12 months compared to baseline, with no significant differences seen regarding lesion size (p-value was 0.34) and relative bone density (p-value was 0.27). There was no substantial change in the tooth sensibility reading between both groups at 6 months (p-value = 0.34), After 1 year, both groups exhibited identical patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Revascularization using PRF or CGF successfully preserved mature teeth with necrotic pulps.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BDJ Open\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790909/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BDJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-024-00288-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-024-00288-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)和浓缩生长因子(CGF)两种再生根管治疗牙髓坏死和根尖周放射率低的成熟恒牙的潜力。方法:本随机临床试验根据牙髓学随机试验首选报告项目2020指南编写。该研究已在临床试验注册中心(ClinicalTrials.gov)注册,识别码为NCT06227533。将18例成熟坏死上颌切牙伴根尖周病变患者随机分为两组,一组采用PRF治疗(n = 9),另一组采用CGF治疗(n = 9)。在治疗开始、治疗后6个月和12个月拍摄x线片,并通过CBCT确认以评估根周愈合情况。在随访期间,采用电浆测试仪和冷试验来确定牙髓敏感性是否恢复。统计分析采用独立t检验进行组间比较。重复测量方差分析比较同一组术前、术后6个月和术后1年的差异。结果:与基线相比,两组患者在6个月和12个月时的愈合均显著增加,病变大小(p值为0.34)和相对骨密度(p值为0.27)无显著差异。6个月时,两组的牙齿敏感性读数无明显变化(p值= 0.34),1年后,两组表现出相同的模式。结论:PRF或CGF可成功保存坏死牙髓的成熟牙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regenerative potential of concentrated growth factor compared to platelet-rich fibrin in treatment of necrotic mature teeth: a randomized clinical trial.

Aim: This study aimed to compare the potential of two regenerative endodontic procedures, platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and concentrated growth factor (CGF), in the treatment of mature permanent teeth with necrotic pulps and periapical radiolucency.

Methods: This randomized clinical trial was written according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Randomized Trials in Endodontics 2020 guidelines. The study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry ( ClinicalTrials.gov ) with identifier number NCT06227533. Eighteen patients with mature necrotic maxillary incisors with periapical lesions were randomly divided into two groups, one group received treatment with PRF (n = 9), while the other received CGF (n = 9). Radiographs were taken at the beginning, 6 and 12 months after treatment, and confirmed with CBCT to assess periradicular healing. An electric pulp tester and cold test were used to determine whether pulp sensibility had been regained during the follow-up period. The statistical analysis used an independent t-test to compare different groups. Repeated measures ANOVA to compare pre-operative, after 6 months, and after 1 year in the same group.

Results: Both groups experienced a considerable increase in healing at 6 and 12 months compared to baseline, with no significant differences seen regarding lesion size (p-value was 0.34) and relative bone density (p-value was 0.27). There was no substantial change in the tooth sensibility reading between both groups at 6 months (p-value = 0.34), After 1 year, both groups exhibited identical patterns.

Conclusion: Revascularization using PRF or CGF successfully preserved mature teeth with necrotic pulps.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BDJ Open
BDJ Open Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信