Daiki Shimotori, Keita Aimoto, Eri Otaka, Jun Matsumura, Shintaro Tanaka, Hitoshi Kagaya, Izumi Kondo
{"title":"跑步机速度选择对亚急性康复患者地上行走步态参数的影响。","authors":"Daiki Shimotori, Keita Aimoto, Eri Otaka, Jun Matsumura, Shintaro Tanaka, Hitoshi Kagaya, Izumi Kondo","doi":"10.1589/jpts.37.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[Purpose] Treadmill-based interventions are widely utilized in rehabilitation due to their advantages of providing controlled environments and enabling individualized training. However, the differences between overground and treadmill walking during the subacute rehabilitation phase remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to compare gait parameters between treadmill walking at varying speeds and overground walking in a subacute rehabilitation setting. [Participants and Methods] A total of 42 inpatients with cerebrovascular and orthopedic conditions were recruited from a convalescent rehabilitation ward. Gait parameters were measured using the Gait Real-time Analysis Interactive Lab (GRAIL) system during comfortable overground walking and treadmill walking at various speeds, including self-selected comfortable speeds and speeds matched to overground walking. Walking speed, stride length, cadence, and step width were calculated without markers and compared across conditions. [Results] The comfortable treadmill walking speed was significantly lower than the overground walking speed (mean [standard deviation]: 0.85 [0.23] m/s vs. 1.20 [0.20] m/s). Stride length was significantly shorter during treadmill walking at comfortable speeds compared to overground walking (0.86 [0.22] m vs. 1.21 [0.18] m), whereas step width was significantly wider (0.17 [0.04] m vs. 0.13 [0.03] m). [Conclusion] Maintaining cadence at reduced treadmill speeds promotes comfortable endurance training in subacute rehabilitation patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physical Therapy Science","volume":"37 2","pages":"89-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of treadmill speed selection on gait parameters compared to overground walking in subacute rehabilitation patients.\",\"authors\":\"Daiki Shimotori, Keita Aimoto, Eri Otaka, Jun Matsumura, Shintaro Tanaka, Hitoshi Kagaya, Izumi Kondo\",\"doi\":\"10.1589/jpts.37.89\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>[Purpose] Treadmill-based interventions are widely utilized in rehabilitation due to their advantages of providing controlled environments and enabling individualized training. However, the differences between overground and treadmill walking during the subacute rehabilitation phase remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to compare gait parameters between treadmill walking at varying speeds and overground walking in a subacute rehabilitation setting. [Participants and Methods] A total of 42 inpatients with cerebrovascular and orthopedic conditions were recruited from a convalescent rehabilitation ward. Gait parameters were measured using the Gait Real-time Analysis Interactive Lab (GRAIL) system during comfortable overground walking and treadmill walking at various speeds, including self-selected comfortable speeds and speeds matched to overground walking. Walking speed, stride length, cadence, and step width were calculated without markers and compared across conditions. [Results] The comfortable treadmill walking speed was significantly lower than the overground walking speed (mean [standard deviation]: 0.85 [0.23] m/s vs. 1.20 [0.20] m/s). Stride length was significantly shorter during treadmill walking at comfortable speeds compared to overground walking (0.86 [0.22] m vs. 1.21 [0.18] m), whereas step width was significantly wider (0.17 [0.04] m vs. 0.13 [0.03] m). [Conclusion] Maintaining cadence at reduced treadmill speeds promotes comfortable endurance training in subacute rehabilitation patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physical Therapy Science\",\"volume\":\"37 2\",\"pages\":\"89-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787860/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physical Therapy Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.37.89\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physical Therapy Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.37.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
【目的】基于跑步机的干预因其提供可控环境和个性化训练的优势而被广泛应用于康复中。然而,在亚急性康复阶段,地上行走和跑步机行走之间的差异仍然不完全清楚。本研究旨在比较亚急性康复环境下不同速度的跑步机行走和地上行走的步态参数。[对象与方法]选取某康复病房脑血管骨科住院患者42例。使用步态实时分析交互实验室(GRAIL)系统测量了舒适的地上行走和跑步机在不同速度下的步态参数,包括自我选择的舒适速度和与地上行走相匹配的速度。在没有标记的情况下计算步行速度、步幅、节奏和步宽,并在不同条件下进行比较。[结果]舒适的跑步机行走速度显著低于地上行走速度(平均[标准差]:0.85 [0.23]m/s vs. 1.20 [0.20] m/s)。在舒适的跑步机上行走时,步幅明显短于地面行走(0.86 [0.22]m vs. 1.21 [0.18] m),而步宽明显宽(0.17 [0.04]m vs. 0.13 [0.03] m)。[结论]在较低的跑步机速度下保持步幅有助于亚急性康复患者的舒适耐力训练。
Influence of treadmill speed selection on gait parameters compared to overground walking in subacute rehabilitation patients.
[Purpose] Treadmill-based interventions are widely utilized in rehabilitation due to their advantages of providing controlled environments and enabling individualized training. However, the differences between overground and treadmill walking during the subacute rehabilitation phase remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to compare gait parameters between treadmill walking at varying speeds and overground walking in a subacute rehabilitation setting. [Participants and Methods] A total of 42 inpatients with cerebrovascular and orthopedic conditions were recruited from a convalescent rehabilitation ward. Gait parameters were measured using the Gait Real-time Analysis Interactive Lab (GRAIL) system during comfortable overground walking and treadmill walking at various speeds, including self-selected comfortable speeds and speeds matched to overground walking. Walking speed, stride length, cadence, and step width were calculated without markers and compared across conditions. [Results] The comfortable treadmill walking speed was significantly lower than the overground walking speed (mean [standard deviation]: 0.85 [0.23] m/s vs. 1.20 [0.20] m/s). Stride length was significantly shorter during treadmill walking at comfortable speeds compared to overground walking (0.86 [0.22] m vs. 1.21 [0.18] m), whereas step width was significantly wider (0.17 [0.04] m vs. 0.13 [0.03] m). [Conclusion] Maintaining cadence at reduced treadmill speeds promotes comfortable endurance training in subacute rehabilitation patients.