喂强化母乳的早产儿蛋白质和能量消化率。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Susanne Soendergaard Kappel, Per Torp Sangild, Gitte Zachariassen, Julie Hvid Andersen, Kirsten Kørup Rasmussen, Palle Bekker Jeppesen, Lise Aunsholt
{"title":"喂强化母乳的早产儿蛋白质和能量消化率。","authors":"Susanne Soendergaard Kappel, Per Torp Sangild, Gitte Zachariassen, Julie Hvid Andersen, Kirsten Kørup Rasmussen, Palle Bekker Jeppesen, Lise Aunsholt","doi":"10.1002/jpn3.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of the present study is to determine whether the apparent nutrient digestibility differs between very preterm infants fortified with bovine colostrum (BC) compared to those fortified with a conventional fortifier (CF), building on previous findings that BC was associated with looser stools and reduced need for laxatives in very preterm infants (VPI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a 24-h digestibility balance study in 10 VPIs to assess the retention of protein, energy, and wet-weight following the intake of fortified human milk and collection of faecal excretions. Infants (n = 5) were matched by gestational age and birthweight.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 10 infants, the mean gestational age and birthweight were 28 ± 1 weeks and 899 ± 182 g, respectively. Infants fortified with BC had a higher faecal energy loss compared with infants fortified with CF (BC: 178 [range 111-205] vs. CF: 153 [96-235] kJ/kg, p < 0.05). No differences (p > 0.05) were found for wet-weight intake (421 [360-427] vs. 494 [328-500] kJ/kg), relative absorption of protein (60 [33-75] vs. 50 [33-75]%) or absolute protein absorption (249 [159-310) vs. 281 [210-347]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nutrient absorption was similar between groups although higher energy loss indicates reduced overall digestibility of BC versus CF, however, with a large variation within each group. Studies on more infants are required to confirm these results. A 24-h digestibility balance study can successfully be used to assess nutrient and energy retention in preterm infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":16694,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protein and energy digestibility in preterm infants fed fortified human milk.\",\"authors\":\"Susanne Soendergaard Kappel, Per Torp Sangild, Gitte Zachariassen, Julie Hvid Andersen, Kirsten Kørup Rasmussen, Palle Bekker Jeppesen, Lise Aunsholt\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jpn3.70000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of the present study is to determine whether the apparent nutrient digestibility differs between very preterm infants fortified with bovine colostrum (BC) compared to those fortified with a conventional fortifier (CF), building on previous findings that BC was associated with looser stools and reduced need for laxatives in very preterm infants (VPI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a 24-h digestibility balance study in 10 VPIs to assess the retention of protein, energy, and wet-weight following the intake of fortified human milk and collection of faecal excretions. Infants (n = 5) were matched by gestational age and birthweight.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 10 infants, the mean gestational age and birthweight were 28 ± 1 weeks and 899 ± 182 g, respectively. Infants fortified with BC had a higher faecal energy loss compared with infants fortified with CF (BC: 178 [range 111-205] vs. CF: 153 [96-235] kJ/kg, p < 0.05). No differences (p > 0.05) were found for wet-weight intake (421 [360-427] vs. 494 [328-500] kJ/kg), relative absorption of protein (60 [33-75] vs. 50 [33-75]%) or absolute protein absorption (249 [159-310) vs. 281 [210-347]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nutrient absorption was similar between groups although higher energy loss indicates reduced overall digestibility of BC versus CF, however, with a large variation within each group. Studies on more infants are required to confirm these results. A 24-h digestibility balance study can successfully be used to assess nutrient and energy retention in preterm infants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.70000\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.70000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是确定与传统强化剂(CF)相比,强化牛初乳(BC)的极早产儿的表观营养物质消化率是否不同,基于先前的研究结果,BC与极早产儿(VPI)的大便疏松和对泻药的需求减少有关。方法:我们在10个vpi中进行了24小时消化率平衡研究,以评估摄入强化母乳和收集粪便后蛋白质、能量和湿重的保留情况。婴儿(n = 5)按胎龄和出生体重匹配。结果:10例患儿平均胎龄28±1周,出生体重899±182 g。在湿重摄取量(421[360-427]对494 [328-500]kJ/kg)、蛋白质的相对吸收量(60[33-75]对50[33-75]%)或绝对蛋白质吸收量(249[159-310]对281[210-347])方面,与添加CF的婴儿相比,添加BC的婴儿的粪便能量损失更高(BC: 178[范围111-205]对CF: 153 [96-235] kJ/kg, p 0.05)。结论:各组之间的营养吸收相似,尽管较高的能量损失表明BC与CF的总消化率降低,但各组之间差异很大。需要对更多的婴儿进行研究来证实这些结果。24小时消化率平衡研究可以成功地用于评估早产儿的营养和能量保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protein and energy digestibility in preterm infants fed fortified human milk.

Objectives: The objective of the present study is to determine whether the apparent nutrient digestibility differs between very preterm infants fortified with bovine colostrum (BC) compared to those fortified with a conventional fortifier (CF), building on previous findings that BC was associated with looser stools and reduced need for laxatives in very preterm infants (VPI).

Methods: We conducted a 24-h digestibility balance study in 10 VPIs to assess the retention of protein, energy, and wet-weight following the intake of fortified human milk and collection of faecal excretions. Infants (n = 5) were matched by gestational age and birthweight.

Results: In the 10 infants, the mean gestational age and birthweight were 28 ± 1 weeks and 899 ± 182 g, respectively. Infants fortified with BC had a higher faecal energy loss compared with infants fortified with CF (BC: 178 [range 111-205] vs. CF: 153 [96-235] kJ/kg, p < 0.05). No differences (p > 0.05) were found for wet-weight intake (421 [360-427] vs. 494 [328-500] kJ/kg), relative absorption of protein (60 [33-75] vs. 50 [33-75]%) or absolute protein absorption (249 [159-310) vs. 281 [210-347]).

Conclusion: Nutrient absorption was similar between groups although higher energy loss indicates reduced overall digestibility of BC versus CF, however, with a large variation within each group. Studies on more infants are required to confirm these results. A 24-h digestibility balance study can successfully be used to assess nutrient and energy retention in preterm infants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.80%
发文量
467
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (JPGN) provides a forum for original papers and reviews dealing with pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, including normal and abnormal functions of the alimentary tract and its associated organs, including the salivary glands, pancreas, gallbladder, and liver. Particular emphasis is on development and its relation to infant and childhood nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信