免疫肿瘤联合治疗转移性MiT家族易位性肾细胞癌的多机构分析。

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Journal of Immunotherapy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1097/CJI.0000000000000549
Yasser Ged, Amina Touma, Luis Meza Contreras, Roy Elias, Joseph Van Galen, Olivia Cupo, Ezra Baraban, Nirmish Singla, Chung-Han Lee, Sumanta Pal, Matthew Zibelman, Ritesh R Kotecha
{"title":"免疫肿瘤联合治疗转移性MiT家族易位性肾细胞癌的多机构分析。","authors":"Yasser Ged, Amina Touma, Luis Meza Contreras, Roy Elias, Joseph Van Galen, Olivia Cupo, Ezra Baraban, Nirmish Singla, Chung-Han Lee, Sumanta Pal, Matthew Zibelman, Ritesh R Kotecha","doi":"10.1097/CJI.0000000000000549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Metastatic translocation renal cell carcinomas (mtRCCs) are rare and aggressive tumors with limited treatment options. Recent studies demonstrated promising activity of immune-oncology (IO) combinations in mtRCC. However, the effectiveness of dual IO combinations versus IO plus VEGF-TKI combinations remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective analysis of IO combinations in mtRCC patients at 4 institutions. Eligible patients had confirmed mtRCC by genitourinary pathologist and received IO combination therapy (IO+IO or IO+VEGF-TKI). Clinical data and treatment outcomes were recorded from the start of systemic therapy. Objective response rate (ORR) was retrospectively evaluated, and time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS) were compared for IO+IO and IO+VEGF-TKI groups. We identified 22 mtRCC patients who received IO combinations, all confirmed to have TFE3 rearrangement by FISH. Most patients were female (68%) with a median age of 41 years (16-79). Treatment breakdown included: IO+IO (n=8, 36%) and IO+VEGF-TKI (n=14, 64%). In the evaluable patients for the efficacy analysis, ORR was 14% (1/7) for the IO+IO group and 54% (6/11) for the IO+VEGF-TKI group. With a median follow-up of 32.4 months, the median TTF was 1.2 months and 6.2 months in the IO+IO and IO+VEGF-TKI groups, respectively ( P =0.12). There was no statistically significant difference in median OS between both groups, 36.7 months in the IO+IO group and 15.6 months in IO+VEGF-TKI ( P =0.9). Our findings demonstrate that IO+VEGF-TKI resulted in higher ORR and TTF point estimates without statistically detectable differences, compared with IO+IO therapy. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and optimize treatment selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":15996,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immunotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"113-117"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11875401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-institutional Analysis of Immune-Oncology Combination Therapy for Metastatic MiT Family Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Yasser Ged, Amina Touma, Luis Meza Contreras, Roy Elias, Joseph Van Galen, Olivia Cupo, Ezra Baraban, Nirmish Singla, Chung-Han Lee, Sumanta Pal, Matthew Zibelman, Ritesh R Kotecha\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CJI.0000000000000549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Metastatic translocation renal cell carcinomas (mtRCCs) are rare and aggressive tumors with limited treatment options. Recent studies demonstrated promising activity of immune-oncology (IO) combinations in mtRCC. However, the effectiveness of dual IO combinations versus IO plus VEGF-TKI combinations remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective analysis of IO combinations in mtRCC patients at 4 institutions. Eligible patients had confirmed mtRCC by genitourinary pathologist and received IO combination therapy (IO+IO or IO+VEGF-TKI). Clinical data and treatment outcomes were recorded from the start of systemic therapy. Objective response rate (ORR) was retrospectively evaluated, and time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS) were compared for IO+IO and IO+VEGF-TKI groups. We identified 22 mtRCC patients who received IO combinations, all confirmed to have TFE3 rearrangement by FISH. Most patients were female (68%) with a median age of 41 years (16-79). Treatment breakdown included: IO+IO (n=8, 36%) and IO+VEGF-TKI (n=14, 64%). In the evaluable patients for the efficacy analysis, ORR was 14% (1/7) for the IO+IO group and 54% (6/11) for the IO+VEGF-TKI group. With a median follow-up of 32.4 months, the median TTF was 1.2 months and 6.2 months in the IO+IO and IO+VEGF-TKI groups, respectively ( P =0.12). There was no statistically significant difference in median OS between both groups, 36.7 months in the IO+IO group and 15.6 months in IO+VEGF-TKI ( P =0.9). Our findings demonstrate that IO+VEGF-TKI resulted in higher ORR and TTF point estimates without statistically detectable differences, compared with IO+IO therapy. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and optimize treatment selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Immunotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"113-117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11875401/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Immunotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CJI.0000000000000549\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CJI.0000000000000549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:转移性易位性肾细胞癌(mtrcc)是一种罕见的侵袭性肿瘤,治疗方案有限。最近的研究表明,免疫肿瘤学(IO)联合治疗mtRCC具有良好的活性。然而,双IO联合与IO + VEGF-TKI联合的有效性尚不清楚。我们对4家机构的mtRCC患者的IO组合进行了回顾性分析。符合条件的患者经泌尿生殖病理学家确诊为mtRCC,并接受IO联合治疗(IO+IO或IO+VEGF-TKI)。从全身治疗开始记录临床数据和治疗结果。回顾性评估客观缓解率(ORR),比较IO+IO组和IO+VEGF-TKI组的治疗失败时间(TTF)和总生存期(OS)。我们确定了22例接受IO联合治疗的mtRCC患者,所有患者均经FISH证实存在TFE3重排。大多数患者为女性(68%),中位年龄为41岁(16-79岁)。治疗分类包括:IO+IO (n=8, 36%)和IO+VEGF-TKI (n=14, 64%)。在可评估的疗效分析患者中,IO+IO组的ORR为14% (1/7),IO+VEGF-TKI组的ORR为54%(6/11)。中位随访32.4个月,IO+IO组和IO+VEGF-TKI组的中位TTF分别为1.2个月和6.2个月(P=0.12)。两组间的中位OS差异无统计学意义,IO+IO组为36.7个月,IO+VEGF-TKI组为15.6个月(P=0.9)。我们的研究结果表明,与IO+IO治疗相比,IO+VEGF-TKI导致更高的ORR和TTF点估计值,但无统计学差异。需要更大规模的研究来验证这些发现并优化治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-institutional Analysis of Immune-Oncology Combination Therapy for Metastatic MiT Family Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Summary: Metastatic translocation renal cell carcinomas (mtRCCs) are rare and aggressive tumors with limited treatment options. Recent studies demonstrated promising activity of immune-oncology (IO) combinations in mtRCC. However, the effectiveness of dual IO combinations versus IO plus VEGF-TKI combinations remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective analysis of IO combinations in mtRCC patients at 4 institutions. Eligible patients had confirmed mtRCC by genitourinary pathologist and received IO combination therapy (IO+IO or IO+VEGF-TKI). Clinical data and treatment outcomes were recorded from the start of systemic therapy. Objective response rate (ORR) was retrospectively evaluated, and time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS) were compared for IO+IO and IO+VEGF-TKI groups. We identified 22 mtRCC patients who received IO combinations, all confirmed to have TFE3 rearrangement by FISH. Most patients were female (68%) with a median age of 41 years (16-79). Treatment breakdown included: IO+IO (n=8, 36%) and IO+VEGF-TKI (n=14, 64%). In the evaluable patients for the efficacy analysis, ORR was 14% (1/7) for the IO+IO group and 54% (6/11) for the IO+VEGF-TKI group. With a median follow-up of 32.4 months, the median TTF was 1.2 months and 6.2 months in the IO+IO and IO+VEGF-TKI groups, respectively ( P =0.12). There was no statistically significant difference in median OS between both groups, 36.7 months in the IO+IO group and 15.6 months in IO+VEGF-TKI ( P =0.9). Our findings demonstrate that IO+VEGF-TKI resulted in higher ORR and TTF point estimates without statistically detectable differences, compared with IO+IO therapy. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and optimize treatment selection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Immunotherapy
Journal of Immunotherapy 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Immunotherapy features rapid publication of articles on immunomodulators, lymphokines, antibodies, cells, and cell products in cancer biology and therapy. Laboratory and preclinical studies, as well as investigative clinical reports, are presented. The journal emphasizes basic mechanisms and methods for the rapid transfer of technology from the laboratory to the clinic. JIT contains full-length articles, review articles, and short communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信