顺铂联合紫杉醇同步放疗治疗局部晚期宫颈鳞状细胞癌的疗效和安全性。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Tao Feng, Yuxin Zhang, Guanghao Zheng, Xiaojuan Lv, Dingding Yan, Yue Feng, Hanmei Lou
{"title":"顺铂联合紫杉醇同步放疗治疗局部晚期宫颈鳞状细胞癌的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Tao Feng, Yuxin Zhang, Guanghao Zheng, Xiaojuan Lv, Dingding Yan, Yue Feng, Hanmei Lou","doi":"10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare outcomes and adverse events of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with cisplatin single-agent chemotherapy vs. CCRT with cisplatin combined with paclitaxel dual-agent therapy. The primary outcomes are overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (DM) and the occurrence of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients with FIGO 2009 stage IB1-IVA cervical squamous cell carcinoma undergoing radical CCRT. Patients were divided into groups A and B, treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups after 1:1 proportional propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Medical records of 1,203 patients were reviewed and 572 patients were finally included for propensity score matching. After propensity score matching, 121 pairs of patients were selected for analysis. The OS, PFS, LR and DM rates were 78.5% and 83.5% (p=0.417), 73.3% and 78.5% (p=0.312), 6.6% and 2.5% (p=0.123), 19% and 15.7% (p=0.497) for groups A and B, respectively. Further subgroup analysis according to stage and lymph node metastatic status showed no difference in survival between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3-4 acute haematological toxicities was different between the two groups (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cisplatin combined with paclitaxel CCRT couldn't improve the survival rates of patients with LACC. However, the hematological toxicity of combination chemotherapy is more severe but controllable. Cisplatin single-agent therapy remains the first choice for CCRT. Further prospective studies are indicated to provide evidence for the efficacy of cisplatin plus paclitaxel in dual-agent concurrent therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","volume":"36 1","pages":"e10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790991/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of cisplatin combined with paclitaxel concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Tao Feng, Yuxin Zhang, Guanghao Zheng, Xiaojuan Lv, Dingding Yan, Yue Feng, Hanmei Lou\",\"doi\":\"10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare outcomes and adverse events of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with cisplatin single-agent chemotherapy vs. CCRT with cisplatin combined with paclitaxel dual-agent therapy. The primary outcomes are overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (DM) and the occurrence of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients with FIGO 2009 stage IB1-IVA cervical squamous cell carcinoma undergoing radical CCRT. Patients were divided into groups A and B, treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups after 1:1 proportional propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Medical records of 1,203 patients were reviewed and 572 patients were finally included for propensity score matching. After propensity score matching, 121 pairs of patients were selected for analysis. The OS, PFS, LR and DM rates were 78.5% and 83.5% (p=0.417), 73.3% and 78.5% (p=0.312), 6.6% and 2.5% (p=0.123), 19% and 15.7% (p=0.497) for groups A and B, respectively. Further subgroup analysis according to stage and lymph node metastatic status showed no difference in survival between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3-4 acute haematological toxicities was different between the two groups (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cisplatin combined with paclitaxel CCRT couldn't improve the survival rates of patients with LACC. However, the hematological toxicity of combination chemotherapy is more severe but controllable. Cisplatin single-agent therapy remains the first choice for CCRT. Further prospective studies are indicated to provide evidence for the efficacy of cisplatin plus paclitaxel in dual-agent concurrent therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"e10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790991/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e10\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e10","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)患者同步放化疗(CCRT)顺铂单药化疗与CCRT顺铂联合紫杉醇双药治疗的预后和不良事件。主要结局是总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、局部复发(LR)、远处转移(DM)和不良事件的发生。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入FIGO 2009期IB1-IVA期宫颈鳞状细胞癌患者行根治性CCRT。将患者分为A组和B组,经1:1比例倾向评分匹配,比较两组患者的治疗效果。结果:回顾了1203例患者的病历,最终纳入572例患者进行倾向评分匹配。经倾向评分匹配后,选取121对患者进行分析。A组和B组的OS、PFS、LR和DM分别为78.5%和83.5% (p=0.417)、73.3%和78.5% (p=0.312)、6.6%和2.5% (p=0.123)、19%和15.7% (p=0.497)。进一步的亚组分析显示,根据分期和淋巴结转移情况,两组之间的生存没有差异。两组3-4级急性血液学毒性发生率差异有统计学意义(p结论:顺铂联合紫杉醇CCRT不能提高LACC患者的生存率。而联合化疗的血液学毒性较重,但可控。顺铂单药治疗仍然是CCRT的首选。进一步的前瞻性研究为顺铂+紫杉醇双药并发治疗的疗效提供证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of cisplatin combined with paclitaxel concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma.

Objective: This study aimed to compare outcomes and adverse events of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with cisplatin single-agent chemotherapy vs. CCRT with cisplatin combined with paclitaxel dual-agent therapy. The primary outcomes are overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (DM) and the occurrence of adverse events.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with FIGO 2009 stage IB1-IVA cervical squamous cell carcinoma undergoing radical CCRT. Patients were divided into groups A and B, treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups after 1:1 proportional propensity score matching.

Results: Medical records of 1,203 patients were reviewed and 572 patients were finally included for propensity score matching. After propensity score matching, 121 pairs of patients were selected for analysis. The OS, PFS, LR and DM rates were 78.5% and 83.5% (p=0.417), 73.3% and 78.5% (p=0.312), 6.6% and 2.5% (p=0.123), 19% and 15.7% (p=0.497) for groups A and B, respectively. Further subgroup analysis according to stage and lymph node metastatic status showed no difference in survival between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3-4 acute haematological toxicities was different between the two groups (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Cisplatin combined with paclitaxel CCRT couldn't improve the survival rates of patients with LACC. However, the hematological toxicity of combination chemotherapy is more severe but controllable. Cisplatin single-agent therapy remains the first choice for CCRT. Further prospective studies are indicated to provide evidence for the efficacy of cisplatin plus paclitaxel in dual-agent concurrent therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gynecologic Oncology (JGO) is an official publication of the Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Abbreviated title is ''J Gynecol Oncol''. It was launched in 1990. The JGO''s aim is to publish the highest quality manuscripts dedicated to the advancement of care of the patients with gynecologic cancer. It is an international peer-reviewed periodical journal that is published bimonthly (January, March, May, July, September, and November). Supplement numbers are at times published. The journal publishes editorials, original and review articles, correspondence, book review, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信