IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Vaughan W Rees, Dorothy Hatsukami, Reinskje Talhout
{"title":"Cigarette filter ventilation, product appeal and regulatory options: a review of the influence of ventilation on consumers' sensory and risk perceptions.","authors":"Vaughan W Rees, Dorothy Hatsukami, Reinskje Talhout","doi":"10.1136/tc-2024-058921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cigarette filter ventilation may enhance product appeal, support initiation and sustained smoking, and increase smoking prevalence. We reviewed recent evidence on how filter ventilation affects consumers' perceptions of product appeal and considered product use preferences to inform regulatory options.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO databases were searched up to December 2023. Systematic search strategies used terms based on cigarette filter ventilation, and multiple constructs comprising product appeal and user perceptions.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Two reviewers screened all 917 retrieved titles and abstracts independently and applied a consensus strategy to identify 16 articles that met eligibility criteria.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Extracted data focused on study design, dependent variables or outcomes, and major conclusions.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>While remaining popular, awareness and risk perception of ventilated cigarettes is generally low. Cigarettes with filter ventilation are perceived as smoother and less irritating than non-ventilated cigarettes. These modified sensory experiences shape perceptions of reduced health risks. Pack text descriptors and colours convey further information to consumers about smoothness, supporting lowered risk perceptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Filter ventilation and its associated marketing continue to influence consumers' perceptions of smoothness creating misperceptions about health risks. Standardised ('plain') packaging regulations are recommended to restrict communication of ventilation themes as well as evidence-based health communications to correct consumer misperceptions about smoothness and health risks. Since filter ventilation has no benefits for public health, policy makers could consider banning filter ventilation or even disallowing filters.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-058921","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:卷烟过滤嘴通风可能会增强产品吸引力,支持开始吸烟和持续吸烟,并增加吸烟率。我们回顾了最近有关过滤嘴通风如何影响消费者对产品吸引力的看法的证据,并考虑了产品使用偏好,以便为监管方案提供信息:PubMed、Embase 和 PsycINFO 数据库的检索截止到 2023 年 12 月。系统性检索策略使用了基于香烟过滤嘴通风的术语,以及由产品吸引力和用户感知组成的多个构词:两名审稿人独立筛选了所有 917 篇检索到的标题和摘要,并采用共识策略确定了 16 篇符合资格标准的文章:数据提取:提取的数据侧重于研究设计、因变量或结果以及主要结论:尽管通气香烟仍然很受欢迎,但人们对其认知度和风险感知普遍较低。与不通气的香烟相比,过滤嘴通气的香烟被认为更顺滑、刺激性更小。这些改变了的感官体验形成了对健康风险降低的认知。包装上的文字说明和颜色向消费者传递了更多关于顺滑的信息,支持了降低风险的认知:结论:过滤嘴通气及其相关营销仍在影响消费者对顺滑度的感知,造成对健康风险的误解。建议制定标准化("普通")包装法规,限制通气主题的传播,并开展以证据为基础的健康宣传,以纠正消费者对顺滑度和健康风险的误解。由于过滤通气对公众健康没有好处,政策制定者可以考虑禁止过滤通气,甚至不允许使用过滤器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cigarette filter ventilation, product appeal and regulatory options: a review of the influence of ventilation on consumers' sensory and risk perceptions.

Objective: Cigarette filter ventilation may enhance product appeal, support initiation and sustained smoking, and increase smoking prevalence. We reviewed recent evidence on how filter ventilation affects consumers' perceptions of product appeal and considered product use preferences to inform regulatory options.

Data sources: PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO databases were searched up to December 2023. Systematic search strategies used terms based on cigarette filter ventilation, and multiple constructs comprising product appeal and user perceptions.

Study selection: Two reviewers screened all 917 retrieved titles and abstracts independently and applied a consensus strategy to identify 16 articles that met eligibility criteria.

Data extraction: Extracted data focused on study design, dependent variables or outcomes, and major conclusions.

Data synthesis: While remaining popular, awareness and risk perception of ventilated cigarettes is generally low. Cigarettes with filter ventilation are perceived as smoother and less irritating than non-ventilated cigarettes. These modified sensory experiences shape perceptions of reduced health risks. Pack text descriptors and colours convey further information to consumers about smoothness, supporting lowered risk perceptions.

Conclusions: Filter ventilation and its associated marketing continue to influence consumers' perceptions of smoothness creating misperceptions about health risks. Standardised ('plain') packaging regulations are recommended to restrict communication of ventilation themes as well as evidence-based health communications to correct consumer misperceptions about smoothness and health risks. Since filter ventilation has no benefits for public health, policy makers could consider banning filter ventilation or even disallowing filters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信