基于运动超声心动图的保留射血分数诊断心力衰竭评分系统。

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kazuki Kagami, Tomonari Harada, Naoki Yuasa, Yuta Tani, Fumitaka Murakami, Yuki Saito, Ayami Naito, Takahiro Okuno, Toshimitsu Kato, Noriaki Takama, Naoki Wada, Takeshi Adachi, Hideki Ishii, Masaru Obokata
{"title":"基于运动超声心动图的保留射血分数诊断心力衰竭评分系统。","authors":"Kazuki Kagami, Tomonari Harada, Naoki Yuasa, Yuta Tani, Fumitaka Murakami, Yuki Saito, Ayami Naito, Takahiro Okuno, Toshimitsu Kato, Noriaki Takama, Naoki Wada, Takeshi Adachi, Hideki Ishii, Masaru Obokata","doi":"10.1093/ehjci/jeaf044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) is often used to identify heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients presenting dyspnoea. However, diagnostic criteria have not been standardized. Here, we sought to develop ESE-based criteria to diagnose HFpEF in dyspnoeic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A total of 81 consecutive patients with dyspnoea who underwent exercise right heart catheterization and ESE were evaluated. Diagnosis of HFpEF was ascertained by directly-measured haemodynamics (61 HFpEF and 20 controls). Logistic regression analysis was applied to develop an ESE-based scoring system to diagnose HFpEF. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified resting left atrial reservoir strain < 20%, exercise septal E/e' ratio > 13, and increases in ultrasound B-lines as independent predictors of HFpEF. A weighted score was created with these variables (the ESE score) ranging from 0 to 5. The ESE score accurately discriminated HFpEF from controls [area under the curve (AUC) 0.90, P < 0.0001], with a superior diagnostic ability to the ASE/ESCVI criteria (AUC comparison P < 0.0001). The ESE score classified the HFpEF probability into three categories (probabilities: low risk 28%, intermediate risk 59-83%, and high risk 95-99%). In a cohort of 620 dyspnoeic patients, the predictive ability of the derived score was assessed. A higher ESE score was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality or worsening HF events even after adjusting for confounders (hazard ratio; 1.17 per 1-point increase, 95% confidence intervals; 1.00-1.37, P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ESE score, which is based on three echocardiographic variables, may be an effective tool for diagnosing HFpEF on exercise echocardiography.</p>","PeriodicalId":12026,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"866-875"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoring system for diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction based on exercise echocardiography.\",\"authors\":\"Kazuki Kagami, Tomonari Harada, Naoki Yuasa, Yuta Tani, Fumitaka Murakami, Yuki Saito, Ayami Naito, Takahiro Okuno, Toshimitsu Kato, Noriaki Takama, Naoki Wada, Takeshi Adachi, Hideki Ishii, Masaru Obokata\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjci/jeaf044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) is often used to identify heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients presenting dyspnoea. However, diagnostic criteria have not been standardized. Here, we sought to develop ESE-based criteria to diagnose HFpEF in dyspnoeic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A total of 81 consecutive patients with dyspnoea who underwent exercise right heart catheterization and ESE were evaluated. Diagnosis of HFpEF was ascertained by directly-measured haemodynamics (61 HFpEF and 20 controls). Logistic regression analysis was applied to develop an ESE-based scoring system to diagnose HFpEF. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified resting left atrial reservoir strain < 20%, exercise septal E/e' ratio > 13, and increases in ultrasound B-lines as independent predictors of HFpEF. A weighted score was created with these variables (the ESE score) ranging from 0 to 5. The ESE score accurately discriminated HFpEF from controls [area under the curve (AUC) 0.90, P < 0.0001], with a superior diagnostic ability to the ASE/ESCVI criteria (AUC comparison P < 0.0001). The ESE score classified the HFpEF probability into three categories (probabilities: low risk 28%, intermediate risk 59-83%, and high risk 95-99%). In a cohort of 620 dyspnoeic patients, the predictive ability of the derived score was assessed. A higher ESE score was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality or worsening HF events even after adjusting for confounders (hazard ratio; 1.17 per 1-point increase, 95% confidence intervals; 1.00-1.37, P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ESE score, which is based on three echocardiographic variables, may be an effective tool for diagnosing HFpEF on exercise echocardiography.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"866-875\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaf044\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaf044","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:运动应激超声心动图(ESE)常用于识别伴有保留射血分数(HFpEF)的呼吸困难患者的心力衰竭。然而,诊断标准尚未标准化。在这里,我们试图建立基于es的标准来诊断呼吸困难患者的HFpEF。方法和结果:对81例连续接受运动右心导管和ESE的呼吸困难患者进行评估。通过直接测量血流动力学来确定HFpEF的诊断(61例HFpEF和20例对照组)。采用Logistic回归分析,建立基于es的HFpEF诊断评分系统。多变量logistic回归分析发现静息左心房贮液应变13和超声b线增加是HFpEF的独立预测因素。用这些变量(ESE分数)创建一个加权分数,范围从0到5。结论:基于三个超声心动图变量的ESE评分可作为运动超声心动图诊断HFpEF的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A scoring system for diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction based on exercise echocardiography.

Aims: Exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) is often used to identify heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients presenting dyspnoea. However, diagnostic criteria have not been standardized. Here, we sought to develop ESE-based criteria to diagnose HFpEF in dyspnoeic patients.

Methods and results: A total of 81 consecutive patients with dyspnoea who underwent exercise right heart catheterization and ESE were evaluated. Diagnosis of HFpEF was ascertained by directly-measured haemodynamics (61 HFpEF and 20 controls). Logistic regression analysis was applied to develop an ESE-based scoring system to diagnose HFpEF. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified resting left atrial reservoir strain < 20%, exercise septal E/e' ratio > 13, and increases in ultrasound B-lines as independent predictors of HFpEF. A weighted score was created with these variables (the ESE score) ranging from 0 to 5. The ESE score accurately discriminated HFpEF from controls [area under the curve (AUC) 0.90, P < 0.0001], with a superior diagnostic ability to the ASE/ESCVI criteria (AUC comparison P < 0.0001). The ESE score classified the HFpEF probability into three categories (probabilities: low risk 28%, intermediate risk 59-83%, and high risk 95-99%). In a cohort of 620 dyspnoeic patients, the predictive ability of the derived score was assessed. A higher ESE score was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality or worsening HF events even after adjusting for confounders (hazard ratio; 1.17 per 1-point increase, 95% confidence intervals; 1.00-1.37, P = 0.04).

Conclusion: The ESE score, which is based on three echocardiographic variables, may be an effective tool for diagnosing HFpEF on exercise echocardiography.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
708
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging is a monthly international peer reviewed journal dealing with Cardiovascular Imaging. It is an official publication of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical from all areas of cardiovascular imaging including echocardiography, magnetic resonance, computed tomography, nuclear and invasive imaging. A range of article types will be considered, including original research, reviews, editorials, image focus, letters and recommendation papers from relevant groups of the European Society of Cardiology. In addition it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of cardiovascular imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信