放养密度对稻鸭小龙虾共养系统中幼鸭生长、器官指数、血清生化、肠道形态和微生物群的影响

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Animal Bioscience Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.5713/ab.24.0488
Xiao Long He, Zhen Hua Liang, Ze Heng Huang, Lian Bing Qi, Yan Wu, Jia Liu, Tao Huang, Jing Bo Liu, Jin Song Pi, Hao Zhang
{"title":"放养密度对稻鸭小龙虾共养系统中幼鸭生长、器官指数、血清生化、肠道形态和微生物群的影响","authors":"Xiao Long He, Zhen Hua Liang, Ze Heng Huang, Lian Bing Qi, Yan Wu, Jia Liu, Tao Huang, Jing Bo Liu, Jin Song Pi, Hao Zhang","doi":"10.5713/ab.24.0488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The rice-duck-crayfish (RDC) coculture system, an ecologically efficient breeding strategy that accommodates natural behavior of ducks and improves their welfare. The optimal stocking density and its impact on duck health in this system remains undetermined. The study examined the impact of stocking densities on growth, organ index, serum biochemistry, gut morphology and microbiota of ducks in RDC system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of five hundred and forty 20-day-old Nonghu No. 2 ducks were randomly allocated based on density: low-density (LD; 8 birds/666.67 m2), mediumdensity (MD; 12 birds/666.67 m2) and high-density (HD; 16 birds/666.67 m2) groups, with three replicates in each group, and the symbiosis period was up to 40 days until rice tasselling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in final body weight, average daily gain, or feed:gain ratio between groups (p>0.05); however, the liver and spleen indices of ducks in HD group were significantly greater than those in LD group (p<0.05). The serum albumin concentration in HD group decreased, whereas creatine kinase activity increased (p<0.05). Additionally, the ileal crypt depth significantly increased and the ileal villus height and villus/crypt ratio significantly decreased in ducks in MD and HD groups compared to LD group (p<0.05). Moreover, the abundance of cecal Deferribacterota and Spirochaetota increased significantly (p<0.05), while the abundance of Firmicutes decreased significantly (p<0.05) with increasing stocking density. Moreover, the increase in stocking density significantly decreased the abundance of some beneficial bacteria (Faecalibacterium and Fournierella) and increased the abundance of some harmful bacteria (Mucispirillum and Brachyspira) (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that moderately HD breeding doesn't significantly affect duck growth, but increased stocking density led to changes in cecal microbiota and dysbiosis. Reducing stocking density positively affects immune parameters and ileum morphology. However, due to the limited number of total replicates of the study, further research is needed to validate the reliability of the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":7825,"journal":{"name":"Animal Bioscience","volume":" ","pages":"1067-1080"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062810/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of stocking densities on growth, organ index, serum biochemistry, gut morphology and microbiota of young ducks in a rice-duck-crayfish coculture system.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Long He, Zhen Hua Liang, Ze Heng Huang, Lian Bing Qi, Yan Wu, Jia Liu, Tao Huang, Jing Bo Liu, Jin Song Pi, Hao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.5713/ab.24.0488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The rice-duck-crayfish (RDC) coculture system, an ecologically efficient breeding strategy that accommodates natural behavior of ducks and improves their welfare. The optimal stocking density and its impact on duck health in this system remains undetermined. The study examined the impact of stocking densities on growth, organ index, serum biochemistry, gut morphology and microbiota of ducks in RDC system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of five hundred and forty 20-day-old Nonghu No. 2 ducks were randomly allocated based on density: low-density (LD; 8 birds/666.67 m2), mediumdensity (MD; 12 birds/666.67 m2) and high-density (HD; 16 birds/666.67 m2) groups, with three replicates in each group, and the symbiosis period was up to 40 days until rice tasselling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in final body weight, average daily gain, or feed:gain ratio between groups (p>0.05); however, the liver and spleen indices of ducks in HD group were significantly greater than those in LD group (p<0.05). The serum albumin concentration in HD group decreased, whereas creatine kinase activity increased (p<0.05). Additionally, the ileal crypt depth significantly increased and the ileal villus height and villus/crypt ratio significantly decreased in ducks in MD and HD groups compared to LD group (p<0.05). Moreover, the abundance of cecal Deferribacterota and Spirochaetota increased significantly (p<0.05), while the abundance of Firmicutes decreased significantly (p<0.05) with increasing stocking density. Moreover, the increase in stocking density significantly decreased the abundance of some beneficial bacteria (Faecalibacterium and Fournierella) and increased the abundance of some harmful bacteria (Mucispirillum and Brachyspira) (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that moderately HD breeding doesn't significantly affect duck growth, but increased stocking density led to changes in cecal microbiota and dysbiosis. Reducing stocking density positively affects immune parameters and ileum morphology. However, due to the limited number of total replicates of the study, further research is needed to validate the reliability of the results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Bioscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1067-1080\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062810/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Bioscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.24.0488\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Bioscience","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.24.0488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:稻鸭小龙虾(RDC)共养系统是一种生态高效的养殖方式,支持鸭的自然习性,提高鸭的福利。然而,该系统的最佳放养密度及其对鸭健康的影响尚未确定。研究了放养密度对RDC系统鸭生长、器官指数、血清生化、肠道形态和微生物群的影响。方法:选取540只20日龄农湖2号鸭,随机分为低密度组(8只/666.67 m2, LD)、中密度组(12只/666.67 m2, MD)和高密度组(16只/666.67 m2, HD),每组3个重复,共生期为40 d,直至水稻抽雄。结果:各组间末重、平均日增重、料重比无显著差异(p < 0.05);HD组鸭的肝脏和脾脏指数显著高于LD组(p)。结论:初步结果表明,适度高密度饲养对鸭的生长没有显著影响,但放养密度的增加导致盲肠菌群的变化和生态失调。减少放养密度对免疫参数和回肠形态有积极影响。然而,由于本研究的总重复数量有限,需要进一步的研究来验证结果的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of stocking densities on growth, organ index, serum biochemistry, gut morphology and microbiota of young ducks in a rice-duck-crayfish coculture system.

Objective: The rice-duck-crayfish (RDC) coculture system, an ecologically efficient breeding strategy that accommodates natural behavior of ducks and improves their welfare. The optimal stocking density and its impact on duck health in this system remains undetermined. The study examined the impact of stocking densities on growth, organ index, serum biochemistry, gut morphology and microbiota of ducks in RDC system.

Methods: A total of five hundred and forty 20-day-old Nonghu No. 2 ducks were randomly allocated based on density: low-density (LD; 8 birds/666.67 m2), mediumdensity (MD; 12 birds/666.67 m2) and high-density (HD; 16 birds/666.67 m2) groups, with three replicates in each group, and the symbiosis period was up to 40 days until rice tasselling.

Results: There were no significant differences in final body weight, average daily gain, or feed:gain ratio between groups (p>0.05); however, the liver and spleen indices of ducks in HD group were significantly greater than those in LD group (p<0.05). The serum albumin concentration in HD group decreased, whereas creatine kinase activity increased (p<0.05). Additionally, the ileal crypt depth significantly increased and the ileal villus height and villus/crypt ratio significantly decreased in ducks in MD and HD groups compared to LD group (p<0.05). Moreover, the abundance of cecal Deferribacterota and Spirochaetota increased significantly (p<0.05), while the abundance of Firmicutes decreased significantly (p<0.05) with increasing stocking density. Moreover, the increase in stocking density significantly decreased the abundance of some beneficial bacteria (Faecalibacterium and Fournierella) and increased the abundance of some harmful bacteria (Mucispirillum and Brachyspira) (p<0.05).

Conclusion: These results suggest that moderately HD breeding doesn't significantly affect duck growth, but increased stocking density led to changes in cecal microbiota and dysbiosis. Reducing stocking density positively affects immune parameters and ileum morphology. However, due to the limited number of total replicates of the study, further research is needed to validate the reliability of the results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Bioscience
Animal Bioscience AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
223
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信